^would you like to support your last claim that science can prove they were designed and put into existence by god? this is actually debate, you kinda need to back up something you say.

He can't, thats why he can't] debate, which further gives you a reason to say this...

That's what we're waitin on. It takes time, they need to figure out it's authenticity. If it's authentic by scientific approval, then it becomes legit. And we move on in hopes we find more.

then offer an explanation to how that would even be possible, or you don't have any clue on that either?

My teacher told me that in atheist is against God and having no religion is either not believing in a higher power or believing in a variety of religions that may contradict each other.
So my question is, are you against God or simply don't believe in anything?

See this is how it works with me buddy, you can ask me a question and I'll answer. But if you're gonna try me while asking a question, you can forget me even bothering to answer.

I could easily tell you the type of technology used by analysts in order to study "authenticity".

Maybe some other time I'll be willing to answer your question, but you lost that chance for now.

Humor us, please.

lol. get out of this thread.

lol.
Take my dick outta your mouth, then I could get out of the thread.



Ha!

See, that's where you lose any credibility that you could possibly have. Just when the forum was giving you a shot again, you say something like that, and blow it for yourself (no pun intended).

That wasn't necessary.

Nor was your comment. I play fire with fire, f**k with it.

when does asking for evidence in a debate warrant that?

Verbal warning.

See, this is exactly why this place should be exclusive. Someone warn this jackass, he's clearly abusing the rules here (and has been, for a long f**king time).

^ You didn't answer my question

You mad?

LOL @ verbal warnings.



Don't ask him questions, it's apparent he's quite upset at the world for being unfair to him w



You warn me, you'd have to warn yourself, nosex, and brooklyneast as well.

Awww he warned me roflmao... what a queer.

Enough.

Back on topic, or your warning level will be raised. Act right in the debate forum.

Thank you for your cooperation.

x2

xxx

Do Atheists find any legitimacy in Buddhism?

I thought about it once. I like the whole desire for proof thing they got going on, but I'm not so sure I believe in the whole reincarnation thing. I mean it sounds interesting, and that wouldn't stop me from looking into it (out of curiosity, not desire for religion).

Reincarnation is a hard concept for me to grasp, sometimes.

Have you ever heard people say, "probably in another life," or something to that effect? It gets me every time.

Frederick Nietzsche does. At least, he prefers it over Christianity.


You don't have to focus on Reincarnation if you don't want to. You can focus on the ethical and moral aspects of Buddhism. It doesn't restrict you at all. Of course, karma and reincarnation is a huge part of it, but I focus on its ethics and morals. There's no punishment for not believing, there's only punishment for living unethically.


"Try you". This is a freaking debate forum, if you're not here to be challenged then, as they say, "get the f**k out". LOL, what part of this don't you understand?

If you continue to sit on that high horse and are not "willing to answer" questions, then you have no evidence to back yourself up. What you say, people will just brush it off as bullshit.




FINALLY. Thanks, Brandon. He's got to be one of the most immature people of the debate forum I've had the unpleasant meet.


See, Nate cusses, but at least he's legitimately debating. The other two are just blowing your fake cover. Don't get mad at them for that, "Be a man!".

*Sigh* Damn it, will one of you merge my freaking posts? Thanks, and sorry for the trouble.

And what fake cover is that?...

By no means would I throw it out the window simply because I'm not all pro believing in reincarnation, I just like to hold my own sets of beliefs and not be part of a religion, much less organized religion.