Log In · Register

 
6 Pages V  « < 2 3 4 5 6 >  
Closed TopicStart new topic
Leniency my ass
pandora
post Oct 25 2007, 06:07 PM
Post #76


i did your boyfriend
*******

Group: Official Designer
Posts: 3,335
Joined: Feb 2004
Member No: 4,071



as a general rule of thumb here, topics that have a point (i'm not saying mine did) shouldnt be closed just because people are spamming in it. you should tell them to quit spamming and leave the thread open.

i don't know why staff started to just close topics like these...

also, just because an issue is "resolved" in the lounge doesnt mean it has to be closed either. people are still allowed to make comments as long as they are relevant to the thread. the only topics that need to be closed when they are resolved are help threads.

arent these in the mod rules backstage? i could swear they were. because i was a mod too. i know these things because i was a mod. mod mod mod.
 
Insurmountable
post Oct 25 2007, 06:08 PM
Post #77


Cornflakes :D
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 4,541
Joined: Dec 2005
Member No: 322,923



Alright Steven _smile.gif

Spencer shut the f**k up already. Your starting to show the Kryo against Suzzette frenzy >_>


Trish, I agree with you. We should post in topics to tell people to control the spamming before thinking of killing the thread.
 
*Steven*
post Oct 25 2007, 06:09 PM
Post #78





Guest






Nah, Sandra's just dumb it seems. She can be alright sometimes, but Spencer definitely isn't following the Kryo vs Suzzette. Besides, Kryo was 100% correct in hindsight. Once we all found out the truth, no one disagreed.
 
Insurmountable
post Oct 25 2007, 06:10 PM
Post #79


Cornflakes :D
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 4,541
Joined: Dec 2005
Member No: 322,923



Yes well I'm looking back on it when Kryo made no sense at all.

Maybe I'll figure it out when I do something bizarre and everyone will look back on this and say Spencer was always right.
 
*Steven*
post Oct 25 2007, 06:10 PM
Post #80





Guest






QUOTE(tripvertigo @ Oct 25 2007, 06:07 PM) *
as a general rule of thumb here, topics that have a point (i'm not saying mine did) shouldnt be closed just because people are spamming in it. you should tell them to quit spamming and leave the thread open.

i don't know why staff started to just close topics like these...

also, just because an issue is "resolved" in the lounge doesnt mean it has to be closed either. people are still allowed to make comments as long as they are relevant to the thread. the only topics that need to be closed when they are resolved are help threads.

arent these in the mod rules backstage? i could swear they were. because i was a mod too. i know these things because i was a mod. mod mod mod.

HEY! I WAS A MOD TOO! PEOPLE SHOULD RESPECT US AMIRITE?
 
pandora
post Oct 25 2007, 06:11 PM
Post #81


i did your boyfriend
*******

Group: Official Designer
Posts: 3,335
Joined: Feb 2004
Member No: 4,071



SPAMSTFU.
 
rnicron
post Oct 25 2007, 06:11 PM
Post #82


Senior Member
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 4,095
Joined: Jul 2005
Member No: 171,080



QUOTE(Insurmountable @ Oct 25 2007, 06:08 PM) *
Spencer shut the f**k up already. Your starting to show the Kryo against Suzzette frenzy >_>
Excuse me for giving my thought on the subject, bitch. Just because you don't agree doesn't mean it's not valid.
 
superstitious
post Oct 25 2007, 06:11 PM
Post #83


Tick tock, Bill
*******

Group: Administrator
Posts: 8,764
Joined: Dec 2005
Member No: 333,948



"I get no respect!"

-Rodney Dangerfield
 
*Steven*
post Oct 25 2007, 06:11 PM
Post #84





Guest






QUOTE(Insurmountable @ Oct 25 2007, 06:10 PM) *
Yes well I'm looking back on it when Kryo made no sense at all.

Maybe I'll figure it out when I do something bizarre and everyone will look back on this and say Spencer was always right.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but Spencer's not personally going after you. You happened to enter the argument on an opposing side, and he clearly disagrees with you. Sandra's just plain clueless and should be demoted or step down at least.
 
Insurmountable
post Oct 25 2007, 06:12 PM
Post #85


Cornflakes :D
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 4,541
Joined: Dec 2005
Member No: 322,923



Moderator guidelines:

QUOTE
spam is something intentional and harmful to the community.



Steven, oh I was starting to get the vibe he was getting anti-mod on me. pinch.gif I'll stay out of it next time.
 
rnicron
post Oct 25 2007, 06:13 PM
Post #86


Senior Member
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 4,095
Joined: Jul 2005
Member No: 171,080



Steven is correct. I'll quote what I said when y'all made hype about it in Anonymous Shoutouts.
QUOTE(Spencer @ Oct 25 2007, 05:25 PM) *
It's nothing personal.

 
*Steven*
post Oct 25 2007, 06:13 PM
Post #87





Guest






Harmful

Holly it's not that you should stay out of it, rather don't take things as someone jumping on an anti mod bandwagon. Keep in mind, we did step down for a reason, and Suzzette wasn't the only black sheep (no pun intended, but lol).
 
pandora
post Oct 25 2007, 06:13 PM
Post #88


i did your boyfriend
*******

Group: Official Designer
Posts: 3,335
Joined: Feb 2004
Member No: 4,071



ok lets try to focus here, i dont think anyone is blaming holly for anything so i dont see why we should resort to any name calling or making this personal.

i agree about sandra though. i gave her another chance to fix her inactivity, but i DID mention that even when she is active, her actions are somewhat... questionable as a mod. she doesnt seem to know what she's doing half the time.
 
Insurmountable
post Oct 25 2007, 06:15 PM
Post #89


Cornflakes :D
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 4,541
Joined: Dec 2005
Member No: 322,923



Oh I only posted the mod guideline thing because Trish said aren't there mod rules, so I quoted that. It was actually funny reading because I never viewed spamming as harmful blink.gif

Oh there is this that everyone loves _smile.gif

QUOTE
id rather prefer you being lenient than overly strict.
 
pandora
post Oct 25 2007, 06:16 PM
Post #90


i did your boyfriend
*******

Group: Official Designer
Posts: 3,335
Joined: Feb 2004
Member No: 4,071



rofl@stevens sig.
 
*Steven*
post Oct 25 2007, 06:16 PM
Post #91





Guest






Well I think a lot of rules are outdated and could use revision. Also just because it says it in the rules, doesn't mean they have to be followed to the dot. Aren't the "guidelines" which would imply that it's something to guide your actions, not decide them?
 
Tung
post Oct 25 2007, 06:17 PM
Post #92


٩(͡๏̯͡๏)۶
********

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 14,309
Joined: Nov 2004
Member No: 65,593



QUOTE(Steven @ Oct 25 2007, 04:05 PM) *
Tung shut the fuck up. You really shouldn't try to jump into these argument, you always have such horrible retorts.


Look. I'm neutral in this. I've already agreed last week when I called out Sandra for being a bad mod, and that opinion still stays, until she improves. As for Spencer, he is blowing a small problem into a big one unnecessarily.
 
pandora
post Oct 25 2007, 06:18 PM
Post #93


i did your boyfriend
*******

Group: Official Designer
Posts: 3,335
Joined: Feb 2004
Member No: 4,071



BBL
 
*Steven*
post Oct 25 2007, 06:18 PM
Post #94





Guest






QUOTE(tungmyBANANA @ Oct 25 2007, 06:17 PM) *
Look. I'm neutral in this. I've already agreed last week when I called out Sandra for being a bad mod, and that opinion still stays, until she improves. As for Spencer, he is blowing a small problem into a big one unnecessarily.

No he isn't. This isn't just because of that one thread telling you to shut up. This is about a lot of mod behavior in general.
 
rnicron
post Oct 25 2007, 06:19 PM
Post #95


Senior Member
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 4,095
Joined: Jul 2005
Member No: 171,080



No, not blowing it up. Fact is, the only way to convey a point to the staff is to argue opposite of what they think.
 
Insurmountable
post Oct 25 2007, 06:19 PM
Post #96


Cornflakes :D
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 4,541
Joined: Dec 2005
Member No: 322,923



QUOTE(Steven @ Oct 25 2007, 07:18 PM) *
No he isn't. This isn't just because of that one thread telling you to shut up. This is about a lot of mod behavior in general.


Like who's may I ask? _smile.gif
 
*Steven*
post Oct 25 2007, 06:21 PM
Post #97





Guest






Well, the numbers used to be larger. I used to really dislike Dee, but at least she owns up and responds in a semi constructive way. I stand corrected, it's not a lot, because there aren't a lot of mods. Sandra, Mike, Rachael in particular stick out like a sore thumb. Though I guess 3 is a lot of mods now.
 
pandora
post Oct 25 2007, 07:09 PM
Post #98


i did your boyfriend
*******

Group: Official Designer
Posts: 3,335
Joined: Feb 2004
Member No: 4,071



tung, shut up!

I don't think Rachael is doing a bad job. She's been pretty active in the queue... she approved a bunch of my things.

Mike, I'm not so sure about. I wonder if modding is too much of a distraction from his modeling career.
 
rnicron
post Oct 25 2007, 07:12 PM
Post #99


Senior Member
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 4,095
Joined: Jul 2005
Member No: 171,080



QUOTE(Steven @ Oct 25 2007, 06:13 PM) *
Keep in mind, we did step down for a reason, and Suzzette wasn't the only black sheep (no pun intended, but lol).
LOL, I just saw that.
QUOTE(tripvertigo @ Oct 25 2007, 07:09 PM) *
Mike, I'm not so sure about. I wonder if modding is too much of a distraction from his modeling career.
LOW BLOW! Agreed, nonetheless.
 
shadowfax
post Oct 25 2007, 07:20 PM
Post #100


Padfoot
******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 1,084
Joined: Sep 2004
Member No: 50,413



QUOTE(Spencer @ Oct 25 2007, 05:26 PM) *
In response to everything Holly quoted even though I didn't read it:


Correct me if I'm wrong, but off-topic usually means NOT ON TOPIC, MEANING SPAM.

Either correct what it says or STFU, generally speaking.
Don't take it so literally. The Lounge shouldn't be filled with topics that are COMPLETE spam. Topics don't necessarily have to ask a question or need to have a point but as long as there's something to talk about. I think you're just nit picking.

Oh, someone pointed out that the rules (or moderation?) should be consistent or something. You guys (Steven and Spencer) know that we're working on revising the rules.
 

6 Pages V  « < 2 3 4 5 6 >
Closed TopicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: