Log In · Register

 

Debate Rules

Here are the general forum rules that you must follow before you start any debate topics. Please make sure you've read and followed all directions.

Debate.

6 Pages V  « < 4 5 6  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Making the Debate Forum Exclusive, What do you think?
bat19
post Sep 27 2007, 08:24 AM
Post #126


Senior Member
*****

Group: Human
Posts: 659
Joined: Jan 2007
Member No: 494,019



QUOTE(Sandraaa @ Sep 27 2007, 09:18 AM) *
Jeremy? I'm not sure if that's your name but spamming isn't the right way to go. thumbsup.gif

OOOhhhhh...Gotcha. Josh said it was, he said it would get me street cred. Thank you Sandraa, never again. Goddamnit Josh...

Josh, you're just a big hermaphroditic dick-pimple for telling me to bash these other scunty Cubers to gain CB street cred. You Are So A Gay.
 
*Uronacid*
post Sep 27 2007, 09:25 AM
Post #127





Guest






QUOTE(The-Abominable-CPillar @ Sep 27 2007, 09:24 AM) *
OOOhhhhh...Gotcha. Josh said it was, he said it would get me street cred. Thank you Sandraa, never again. Goddamnit Josh...

Josh, you're just a big hermaphroditic dick-pimple for telling me to bash these other scunty Cubers to gain CB street cred. You Are So A Gay.


See what you did Sandraaa, GAAAHHHH!!!
 
Jennifer
post Sep 29 2007, 07:27 PM
Post #128


<3
******

Group: Official Member
Posts: 1,369
Joined: Jun 2007
Member No: 539,187



I don't think individuals should get "permission" to post here ermm.gif
I understand what everyone's saying about how some people just post nonsense. It's a persons opinion/point of view. If you make a topic in the debate forum, obviously you want opinions and why.
People who can contribute to your questions may not be able to, because they don't have permission to do so.

QUOTE
Anyway ... I really don't think it's necessary to exclude people deemed "unworthy" from the debate forum. We should probably just implement a few rules like:

1. If you post an argument in a topic, go back and see the responses you've received.
2. Speak clearly, in complete sentences and try your best to spell correctly.
3. Do not repeat points that have already been made. Respond to other peoples' posts or describe new points to add to the discussion.
4. Skim through the posts before you post your own to get an idea of what's already happened and what would be appropriate for you to say.


Yeah, that I agree with. It seems that's taken in action already though, which is good. It should help stop some 'nonsense' posts without restricting people.
 
NoSex
post Sep 30 2007, 03:19 PM
Post #129


in the reverb chamber.
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 4,022
Joined: Nov 2005
Member No: 300,308



QUOTE(RogueVanity @ Sep 29 2007, 07:27 PM) *
Yeah, that I agree with. It seems that's taken in action already though, which is good. It should help stop some 'nonsense' posts without restricting people.


What has been proposed doesn't really restrict anyone either.
 
bat19
post Oct 3 2007, 08:44 AM
Post #130


Senior Member
*****

Group: Human
Posts: 659
Joined: Jan 2007
Member No: 494,019



QUOTE(NoSex @ Sep 30 2007, 04:19 PM) *
What has been proposed doesn't really restrict anyone either.

So why propose it dumbass? What exactly is the point?

QUOTE(NoSex @ Sep 26 2007, 02:58 PM) *
The membership here can change. But, this place will probably have to change first. I've actually seen some very intelligent and capable people come through these debate forums. Can you figure out why they left? I would like to see those sorts of people stay, and with that, attract a more serious and interesting membership.

Dude, how do you not understand that you are a f**kin idiot? You seriously are. Jesus christ, you're the very worst type of idiot too, the self-righteous ignorant retarded. You dont know jack shit. You think you have some knowledge of the world, but that's all in your head my friend. The reality is that you know next to nothing and some day you're gonna find that out the hard way. You don't know what intelligence is. You're f**kin 19, go do something with your life. Go get drunk, not wasted a-hole, just drunk. Im sure you never have, but you might actually find some fun out of life. Just don't overdo it, drink only enough to get you happy, not puking. So one beer should do it for you, you f**kin noob.
 
*Uronacid*
post Oct 3 2007, 10:27 AM
Post #131





Guest






QUOTE(The-Abominable-CPillar @ Oct 3 2007, 09:44 AM) *
So why propose it dumbass? What exactly is the point?
Dude, how do you not understand that you are a f**kin idiot? You seriously are. Jesus christ, you're the very worst type of idiot too, the self-righteous ignorant retarded. You dont know jack shit. You think you have some knowledge of the world, but that's all in your head my friend. The reality is that you know next to nothing and some day you're gonna find that out the hard way. You don't know what intelligence is. You're f**kin 19, go do something with your life. Go get drunk, not wasted a-hole, just drunk. Im sure you never have, but you might actually find some fun out of life. Just don't overdo it, drink only enough to get you happy, not puking. So one beer should do it for you, you f**kin noob.


You called him a noob... not cool... not cool...
 
NoSex
post Oct 3 2007, 11:07 PM
Post #132


in the reverb chamber.
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 4,022
Joined: Nov 2005
Member No: 300,308



QUOTE(The-Abominable-CPillar @ Oct 3 2007, 08:44 AM) *
Dude, how do you not understand that you are a f**kin idiot? You seriously are. Jesus christ, you're the very worst type of idiot too, the self-righteous ignorant retarded. You dont know jack shit. You think you have some knowledge of the world, but that's all in your head my friend. The reality is that you know next to nothing and some day you're gonna find that out the hard way. You don't know what intelligence is. You're f**kin 19, go do something with your life. Go get drunk, not wasted a-hole, just drunk. Im sure you never have, but you might actually find some fun out of life. Just don't overdo it, drink only enough to get you happy, not puking. So one beer should do it for you, you f**kin noob.


I haven't gotten this much attention in weeks.
You love me.
 
*Uronacid*
post Oct 4 2007, 08:43 AM
Post #133





Guest






QUOTE(NoSex @ Oct 4 2007, 12:07 AM) *
I haven't gotten this much attention in weeks.
You love me.


Haha, omg xD
 
bat19
post Oct 4 2007, 08:46 AM
Post #134


Senior Member
*****

Group: Human
Posts: 659
Joined: Jan 2007
Member No: 494,019



I'm gonna rape Heather Donahue. Im gonna make her see my Blair Witch Project...in my pants. And she's gonna scream, and she's gonna drip snot, but it will happen.
 
*Uronacid*
post Oct 4 2007, 08:47 AM
Post #135





Guest






QUOTE(The-Abominable-CPillar @ Oct 4 2007, 09:46 AM) *
I'm gonna rape Heather Donahue. Im gonna make her see my Blair Witch Project...in my pants. And she's gonna scream, and she's gonna drip snot, but it will happen.


*spits iced tea all over his cubicle*
AHahhHAHahhaHAhaHahhahaHahAHhAhaHahaHAhaH!!!
 
illriginal
post Apr 3 2008, 06:18 PM
Post #136


Senior Member
*******

Group: Official Member
Posts: 6,349
Joined: Aug 2006
Member No: 455,274



Only reason why Nosex wants to exclude members from debates is because as people read all his debates, typically his "atheist views" one comes to wonder what sort of bullshit is he feeding us. He's had excuse after excuse for nearly every answer, in terms of atheism at least.

Above that, he's the first one to start personal attacks.
 
BadCraziness
post Apr 3 2008, 06:32 PM
Post #137


nicola
***

Group: Member
Posts: 66
Joined: Mar 2008
Member No: 635,560



QUOTE(Tamacracker @ Apr 3 2008, 07:18 PM) *
Above that, he's the first one to start personal attacks.



riiiiight:

QUOTE(Tamacracker @ Mar 17 2008, 07:34 PM) *
Who gives a shit what a human has to say about Gods work. So what if a Jew said 7 days. Mother f**ker what I'm sayin is... when God told his people it took him 7 days, mother f**ker it was his 7 days, not human, planetary, motherf**kin earthly 7 mther shit f**k 7 days. f**k!!!
If God said, Earth is the size of a pea... motherf**ker, do you really think we're on planet earth the size of a pea? No.. this isn't taken literally. To God's enormous size... from his own EYES, from his OWN perception earth from the distance OF HIM makes the motehr f**kin shitty f**kin planet the size of the mother f**kin pea that's in your mother f**kin mouth mother f**ker!!....


anddd:

QUOTE(Tamacracker @ Mar 29 2008, 04:38 AM) *
Ah... well in that case, f**k you. Eat shit and die. wink.gif

....

And can you learn how to quote so you can just post once, instead of posting over and over. Post-whore.


post-whore? ouch.

QUOTE(Tamacracker @ Mar 29 2008, 05:19 AM) *
You're insulting my belief system... so uh, f**k you, eat shit and die. You're lucky we aren't back in time. I'd cut your head off, infidel. That's what God likes.



before you start pointing fingers, make sure your hands are clean~*~*
 
NoSex
post Apr 3 2008, 06:40 PM
Post #138


in the reverb chamber.
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 4,022
Joined: Nov 2005
Member No: 300,308



QUOTE(Tamacracker @ Apr 3 2008, 05:18 PM) *
Above that, he's the first one to start personal attacks.
... he said, as he personally attacked poor and helpless Nate.


My intent is actually quite sincere here, and has always been. But, I don't feel like defending my method or behavior or character - that really isn't relevant to this discussion. So, here is a short reiteration of my idea:

1. Make a new membership group that has exclusive access to the debate threads.
a. this group would be exclusive posted rights
b. all other groups would still be able to read the debate threads
2. Applicants may or may not undergo screening or evaluation.
a. if screening of applicants was implemented, it would not be strict or political. It would merely be used to ensure that the applicant had a sincere desire to be involved in meaningful argumentation.
b. If no screening was required, applicants would be given the privilege of posting.
3. New debate guidelines and rules would be implemented.
a. clearer and more precise guidelines
b. clearer and more precise punishments.
c. possibly suggestive materials on the art and appropriate procedures of argumentation.
4. Posting would be a privilege not a right.
a. all members of the debate group would be subject to removal.
b. extended absence, refusal to follow guidelines and rules, etc. etc. would result in the privilege of posting be removed.

This isn't anything wildly revolutionary and I have seen it been done right and successfully on many different occasions. I feel that it is one of the best opportunities this community has for improving, and encouraging, the quality of these forums.
 
illriginal
post Apr 3 2008, 06:59 PM
Post #139


Senior Member
*******

Group: Official Member
Posts: 6,349
Joined: Aug 2006
Member No: 455,274



Then why not make a member's only debate forum and leave the one that already exists intact. wink.gif
 
NoSex
post Apr 3 2008, 07:40 PM
Post #140


in the reverb chamber.
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 4,022
Joined: Nov 2005
Member No: 300,308



QUOTE(Tamacracker @ Apr 3 2008, 05:59 PM) *
Then why not make a member's only debate forum and leave the one that already exists intact. wink.gif


Lack of traffic and participation, mainly.
 
Melissa
post Apr 3 2008, 08:16 PM
Post #141


;)
******

Group: Duplicate
Posts: 2,374
Joined: Feb 2004
Member No: 3,760



QUOTE(Acid Bath Slayer @ Jun 21 2006, 04:16 PM) *
That, of course, would be the largest obstacle.
Designated moderators would be involved in allowing permission into the debate threads.
They could have personal interviews with applicants over PM's, IM, or E-mail. All of this contact information would be stickied and provided for interested parties. The moderator would be looking for the applicant's intentions, maturity, and capabilities. It may be asked of the applicant to provide a brief written work of expository writing or a list of positions on major issues with short justifications for each (in fact, a list of important issues could be suggested). The moderator would use his or her own discretion in accepting an applicant. This, of course, is one way that it could be done, among numerous others that exist.

I have seen this work very well on other community boards and was very impressed by the increased quality of their debate threads. I don't think for a second that this would be too difficult to impliment.


I do agree with you on the point that the debate forum is brought down by excessive spam, posts that bring up arguments without back up, and pretty much ridiculous back-and-forth arguments that sometimes have nothing to do with the topic at hand.

An interview, however, is not a good way to go about this. Who really wants to actually apply just to be able to post their opinions in a forum? I think there should be debate moderators who'll warn members that just spam in the threads and if there are certain people who really have nothing to contribute, have it so they can't post in debate.
 
illriginal
post Apr 4 2008, 10:04 AM
Post #142


Senior Member
*******

Group: Official Member
Posts: 6,349
Joined: Aug 2006
Member No: 455,274



QUOTE(NoSex @ Apr 3 2008, 08:40 PM) *
Lack of traffic and participation, mainly.

Then I guess you're screwed wink.gif
 
rawtheekuh
post Apr 12 2008, 08:29 PM
Post #143


me gustas tu
***

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 53
Joined: Apr 2008
Member No: 639,446



this thread is the very reason that we should kick all the idiots out of this forum.
 
illriginal
post Apr 12 2008, 08:30 PM
Post #144


Senior Member
*******

Group: Official Member
Posts: 6,349
Joined: Aug 2006
Member No: 455,274



QUOTE(megustanloshuevos @ Apr 12 2008, 09:29 PM) *
this thread is the very reason that we should kick all the idiots out of this forum.

you have somethin else to say?... who are these idiots?
 

6 Pages V  « < 4 5 6
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: