Mod Punishment |
Mod Punishment |
*tripvertigo* |
![]()
Post
#1
|
Guest ![]() |
We all know what happens when members break the rules, and whatnot. Warnings, Mutings, Suspensions, Bans...
What should happen to a moderator if they are out of line? |
|
|
![]() |
*Elba* |
![]()
Post
#76
|
Guest ![]() |
Wow, I should tell him to reduce my warning level.
|
|
|
*shotgunFUNERAL* |
![]()
Post
#77
|
Guest ![]() |
can we just make a chat like we did last time something had to be discussed with jusun?
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#78
|
|
![]() Yup thats my girlfriend. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Banned Posts: 665 Joined: Mar 2007 Member No: 513,693 ![]() |
LOL at this thread. I honestly don't see how people can get mad on the internet.
![]() I could care less what happens with mod punishment. Whether you demod them or do nothing at all. I could care less if my warning level is raised for months (which it was) or if I get suspended. But if yall were going to do something to the mods, the person you guys demod, let me take their spots temporarily so I can sit at my throne. ![]() |
|
|
*ersatz* |
![]()
Post
#79
|
Guest ![]() |
Just a sidenoteeeee...
At the beginning of the thread, I think the misunderstanding was that it was the first offense...like the mod is demodded for a bit the FIRST time a punishment has to be discussed. If a punishment for them has to be discussed again...that would be grounds for a demotion for me (like Suzzette said, we were both bringing up demotion in that other incident, so I may be thinking tougher than the other staff members, but whatever). But...if that was not what was going wonky, then ignore me. ![]() |
|
|
![]()
Post
#80
|
|
![]() Quand j'étais jeune... ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 6,826 Joined: Jan 2004 Member No: 1,272 ![]() |
Response to your edit: Do you think that it's justifyable that a mod is demodded on the spot. When a member would lose their OM status on the spot? Or do you think that something more serious should happpen to the mod? A moderator makes certain guarantees/promises when they apply, don't they? If they fail such guarantees shouldn't they own up to them? A moderator is on a different level than OMs and members. Therefore, they should be punished on a differently level. |
|
|
*mzkandi* |
![]()
Post
#81
|
Guest ![]() |
I'm sorry Suzzette. I really wish Kiera or Rebecca was on. Hello! I'm here now, I apologize for the wait. Our discussion about what to do about the Robbi and Diana situation went from possible demotion and immediately to giving them a week off (suspension). I went over the thread again and towards the end no discussion of increasing their warning was mentioned, even though if I do recall correctly it was briefly discussed in the beginning because it is what we did when we suspended Nicki. I think (at least on my part) the increased warning was overlooked because I hadn't noticed myself until it was mentioned in this thread. |
|
|
*shotgunFUNERAL* |
![]()
Post
#82
|
Guest ![]() |
|
|
|
*mzkandi* |
![]()
Post
#83
|
Guest ![]() |
Yes, I wasn't the one who actually put them to official member status, Rebecca did. Our (head/admins/mentors) discussion toward the end just gear around "Ok, they are going to be suspended for a week, after a week if they want to come back then they are welcome to rejoin". The discussion on actually having a warning accompany that was lost amongst all of the discussion how on to handlethe whole thing. I'm going to recheck what was said to see.
|
|
|
*shotgunFUNERAL* |
![]()
Post
#84
|
Guest ![]() |
so, if they're allowed to begin modding again after a week, i, too, should be able to have back my official membership to avoid flood control. say it's a different situation all you guys want because it's all i've heard, but it's unfair for the people who are referred to as "role models" to be able to resume a position of power after only a week, while they participated in the same thing we did and we still have a warning. if they are trusted with power, they are trusted not to abuse it, and when they do, they should be demodded for more than a week...or at least as long as the other people involved.
i don't give a shit if it's "harsher" because they aren't able to do any moderation things for a week, but it was their choice to become involved and they should take things accordingly ESPECIALLY since they are an example of the rules. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#85
|
|
![]() Training at the National Culinary Institute :D ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 48 Joined: Apr 2007 Member No: 518,628 ![]() |
Drawn and quartered? xD I'll bet whoever it was that warned you hypothetically, was probably mistaken if you don't know what for.
Maybe just let it rest a bit, or talk to another Mod who may be able to make sense of the situation. :] |
|
|
![]()
Post
#86
|
|
![]() dripping destruction ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 7,282 Joined: Jun 2004 Member No: 21,929 ![]() |
It should be a tradition that if your modding powers are suspended, you resign your position.
Because seriously, if you've abused your power, you're not fit to be a mod anymore. Have the decency to step down. Hell, I stepped down because I knew i wasn't going to be able to be as active as being a mod required. It's a common decency. If you're not doing the job well, vacate the position so someone better qualified can fill in. |
|
|
*Elba* |
![]()
Post
#87
|
Guest ![]() |
I sure wish Robbi and Diana would reply to this topic.
|
|
|
*shotgunFUNERAL* |
![]()
Post
#88
|
Guest ![]() |
i'd actually like to know if our punishment was actually brought up in the diana/robbi demodding stages.
|
|
|
*Kathleen* |
![]()
Post
#89
|
Guest ![]() |
The fact that some members of the mod staff need punishment for anything at all tells you a lot about the direction this forum is going in.
Things were much better when I was admin. |
|
|
*Elba* |
![]()
Post
#90
|
Guest ![]() |
The fact that some members of the mod staff need punishment for anything at all tells you a lot about the direction this forum is going in. Things were much better when I was admin. Heck yeah they were! Not like I was around at that time, haha. I miss you Kathleen ![]() |
|
|
*Kathleen* |
![]()
Post
#91
|
Guest ![]() |
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#92
|
|
![]() dripping destruction ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 7,282 Joined: Jun 2004 Member No: 21,929 ![]() |
hell yea!
|
|
|
*tripvertigo* |
![]()
Post
#93
|
Guest ![]() |
PUT THE OLD REGIME BACK!
QUOTE Stfu. Looks like you just got owned. |
|
|
*Elba* |
![]()
Post
#94
|
Guest ![]() |
Your mom.
|
|
|
*Kathleen* |
![]()
Post
#95
|
Guest ![]() |
|
|
|
*Elba* |
![]()
Post
#96
|
Guest ![]() |
|
|
|
*Kathleen* |
![]()
Post
#97
|
Guest ![]() |
|
|
|
*brownsugar* |
![]()
Post
#98
|
Guest ![]() |
Alright, can we please get back on topic.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#99
|
|
![]() dripping destruction ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 7,282 Joined: Jun 2004 Member No: 21,929 ![]() |
you guys are ignoring the topic.
|
|
|
*brownsugar* |
![]()
Post
#100
|
Guest ![]() |
Really? I've been discussing it the whole way through, and agreeing that we need to form guidelines and continue the discussion.
![]() What are you talking about? |
|
|
![]() ![]() |