Log In · Register

 
2 Pages V   1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
110 lbs is fat?!
HennaGaijin
post May 18 2007, 05:54 PM
Post #1


Newbie
*

Group: Member
Posts: 8
Joined: May 2007
Member No: 522,732



Yep.
 
*steve330*
post May 18 2007, 06:04 PM
Post #2





Guest






^
Toothpicks = t3h HAWT! Personally, I like toothpicks because I can stick them into my hole. It's kind of a reverse-roleplay.
 
dalenaadsiqnz
post May 18 2007, 06:04 PM
Post #3


Senior Member
*****

Group: Member
Posts: 310
Joined: Dec 2006
Member No: 489,303



I don`t consider that fat. :) But nowadays, so many people are too body conscious; 80lbs. is NOT healthy.
 
HelloSunshine
post May 18 2007, 06:06 PM
Post #4


High Voltage!∞
*******

Group: Official Member
Posts: 4,728
Joined: Jul 2004
Member No: 29,157



No, I don't consider that fat.
I heard/read somewhere that for every five feet, you should be a hundred pounds.
So, you shouldn't worry.
It's just certain people's misconception of what is "fat" because of what the media puts out there.

And not all people who are "toothpicks" chose to be that way. They have fast metabolisms, and many of them would actually want to gain a few pounds.

Nobody should have to starve themselves to make themselves happy with themselves, but unfortunately, it happens. sad.gif
 
technicolour
post May 18 2007, 06:10 PM
Post #5


show me a garden thats bursting to life
********

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 12,303
Joined: Mar 2005
Member No: 115,987



Who cares what everyone else says? Just pay attention to what your freaking Doctor, the guy who knows more about nutrition than anyone else, except for a nutritionist, and no one else.


And it's not fat. Gosh.
 
*steve330*
post May 18 2007, 06:11 PM
Post #6





Guest






@ Universal
So should a 6 foot person weigh 120 lbs? And a 6'4'' person weigh 126.66 lbs? If so I'm incredibly obese weighing in at a whopping 180 lbs.
 
deplorable
post May 18 2007, 06:13 PM
Post #7


we go a-drowning
*****

Group: Member
Posts: 964
Joined: Apr 2007
Member No: 519,725



i hope to god that that doesnt count as fat or im OBESE! ahh.
seriously though, i have curves and i like it
somehowthe little black dress looks sexier in the 130 pounder with curves than the straight, flat 100 pounder.
and yeah, as mentioned above, some peoples motabolism acts faster and everyone is different, so i dont think its fair to call the 100 pound girl a tooth pick, just like it isnt fair to call the girl weighing 130 pounds a fatty.
 
*steve330*
post May 18 2007, 06:16 PM
Post #8





Guest






It is fair to call them a fatty if they are as wide as they are tall. But yeah, metabolisms / genetics play big rolls, through genetics can easily be overcome if you work @ it. And yeah, Muscle > Fat so muscular people can be smaller than fat people and still weigh more.
 
HelloSunshine
post May 18 2007, 06:16 PM
Post #9


High Voltage!∞
*******

Group: Official Member
Posts: 4,728
Joined: Jul 2004
Member No: 29,157



QUOTE(steve330 @ May 18 2007, 4:11 PM) *
@ Universal
So should a 6 foot person weigh 120 lbs? And a 6'4'' person weigh 126.66 lbs? If so I'm incredibly obese weighing in at a whopping 180 lbs.


..? I saiid I read/heard somewhere. Which means you shouldn't take it too seriosuly. _smile.gif
Just don't take it to an exact extreme..
 
deplorable
post May 18 2007, 06:19 PM
Post #10


we go a-drowning
*****

Group: Member
Posts: 964
Joined: Apr 2007
Member No: 519,725



yeah, and steve, the statistics are different for guys...
 
*steve330*
post May 18 2007, 06:30 PM
Post #11





Guest






pfft. Can't yall see I'm being sarcastic? Hence first response lol
 
HelloSunshine
post May 18 2007, 06:35 PM
Post #12


High Voltage!∞
*******

Group: Official Member
Posts: 4,728
Joined: Jul 2004
Member No: 29,157



QUOTE(steve330 @ May 18 2007, 4:30 PM) *
pfft. Can't yall see I'm being sarcastic? Hence first response lol

laugh.gif I thought you were only being sarcastic in the first post. It's hard to see sarcasm typed out, lol.
Uhhm, anywas..back on topic. _smile.gif
 
*AngelicEyz00*
post May 18 2007, 06:36 PM
Post #13





Guest






5'2" You should be under 100.

Fatty.
 
*MyMichelle*
post May 18 2007, 06:41 PM
Post #14





Guest






QUOTE(AngelicEyz00 @ May 18 2007, 7:36 PM) *
5'2" You should be under 100.

Fatty.


I must say I agree.
 
*steve330*
post May 18 2007, 06:43 PM
Post #15





Guest






You only say that because you wish you weren't 135 lbs/5 ft flat.
Michelle you seriously need to stop eating all that unhealthy food and you should get out and run w/ me...
 
*AngelicEyz00*
post May 18 2007, 06:45 PM
Post #16





Guest






You put your girlfriend's weight on blast, ooooooooooh.

And I was kidding, 110 isn't fat at all for 5'2".
 
*MyMichelle*
post May 18 2007, 06:46 PM
Post #17





Guest






:O

I'M ACTUALLY ONLY 95 LBS, YOU FAT-ASS (STEVEN) YOU NEED TO LOSE SOME f**king WEIGHT, LAZY-LARD.
I <3 you ;)
 
*steve330*
post May 18 2007, 06:53 PM
Post #18





Guest






Haha yeah. 100 lbs/5ft aint nuttin to squawk at.
Honestly, I'd rather just look at myself and see if I have any obvious bulges of fat protruding from my body. If so then that would kinda let me know how I'm doing healthwise :) Also big energy levels tend to one believe they're doing good.
 
xniksz
post May 18 2007, 07:33 PM
Post #19


Member
**

Group: Member
Posts: 28
Joined: Apr 2007
Member No: 515,195



nah i don't think you're "fat"

and i agree with what you said 'bout the 80lbs "toothpick" people. they are not healthy at all.
media portrays such bad images that adolescents look up to to consider them "normal."
it's a bit sad actually ]:
 
clarity
post May 18 2007, 07:36 PM
Post #20


vengeance.
*******

Group: Official Member
Posts: 3,058
Joined: Jul 2006
Member No: 437,024



wtf hell noooo. stubborn.gif
 
*karmakiller*
post May 18 2007, 08:13 PM
Post #21





Guest






Don't pay attention to the number, pay attention to your health.

Someone can be healthy at 140lbs. Someone else can be healthy at 90lbs. Just pay attention to your body and don't let your weight rule you. Your weight fluxuates daily, anyways.
 
alysaphobia
post May 18 2007, 09:00 PM
Post #22


What a sick, masochistic lion.
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,853
Joined: Sep 2006
Member No: 460,535




I don't.
Those 110 pounds aren't pure fat; they're made up also of MUSCLE. Some people tend to have a more muscular body, so they can tend to weigh more sometimes.
 
*steve330*
post May 18 2007, 11:26 PM
Post #23





Guest






yup yup yup
past few posts have nailed it :)
Like I used to be a lil chubbier than I am now, but since I've started working out I've gained a few lbs but gotten thinner. Had to get used to not measuring productivity in working out by what the scale said -.-

One time I had neglected eating all day because I was trying to eat less and really hadn't much paid attention to my stomach. I mean I'm not anorexic or anything, but I just didn't really eat that day. I was @ this place while my girlfriend was getting her anti-brows pierced and I randomly fainted due to lack of food t.t
 
*stephinika*
post May 19 2007, 12:59 AM
Post #24





Guest






It depends on your height and health in general, not just the number that shows up on the scale. 110 lbs. is fine at that height...80 lbs. seems a little on the skinny side to say the least.
 
demolished
post May 19 2007, 07:39 AM
Post #25


Senior Member
*******

Group:
Posts: 8,274
Joined: Mar 2004
Member No: 8,001



That weight of yours is perfect. People are so fed up with fatness. i like girls with meat, you know. i dont find myself attracted to skinny girls. we need beautifulawesomegreattt people like you, healthy girls with meat. thumbsup.gif Now, that sounds corny. laugh.gif
 

2 Pages V   1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: