Log In · Register

 

Debate Rules

Here are the general forum rules that you must follow before you start any debate topics. Please make sure you've read and followed all directions.

Debate.

2 Pages V   1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Design your own baby!
marzipan
post Sep 14 2006, 07:35 PM
Post #1


Krista.
*******

Group: Official Member
Posts: 4,380
Joined: Apr 2006
Member No: 391,319



I've heard about technology now where you can change the genes of a baby still in the womb of a pregnant woman to make it what you want it to look like. That seems kind of weird to me. Some might find it morally wrong because God created us all how he wanted us.

But then again, if you found out that your baby had a certain disorder or disease, wouldn't you want to fix that?

Do you find this right or wrong?
 
Serendipity
post Sep 14 2006, 07:45 PM
Post #2


the bird and the bee sides!
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,697
Joined: Aug 2005
Member No: 201,280



I'm leaning more toward natural birth.
If my child had a disorder or disease, I think I would try to embrace that, and not try to change his/her genes before they're born. But that's just my opinion.
 
RxCore
post Sep 14 2006, 07:47 PM
Post #3


Quiet, Doggie!
*****

Group: Member
Posts: 394
Joined: Aug 2006
Member No: 452,267



i think it depends on what the disease was? if it was life threatening then maybe i would try to change that. but if the baby would be able to lead a normal life with the disorder, then i second what mini says.
 
omgomgKATHY
post Sep 14 2006, 07:50 PM
Post #4


for SHIZZ.
*****

Group: Member
Posts: 878
Joined: Jul 2006
Member No: 435,846



it doesn't seem wrong. if it's a disease i understand, but if you just want to change your baby's appearance i think that's wrong.
 
*Kathleen*
post Sep 14 2006, 07:56 PM
Post #5





Guest






Oh geez. Us ugly kids should be ugly if we were created that way. Gosh. Leave us ugly kids in peace already.
 
Comptine
post Sep 14 2006, 08:02 PM
Post #6


Sing to Me
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,825
Joined: Apr 2004
Member No: 10,808



designer babies are made by altering genes in the sperm, egg, or very early embroyos. it usually done in a little dish in the laboratory.

a lot of people having designer babies use genetic engineering to stop the passing on of diseases and disorders. i suppose there are some vain people out there who mix and match the parents best genes into the child and some use it to determine the sex of the child.

there's two types. one makes changes that do not become hereditary and target specific areas. i suppose genetic engineering is okay if it's to change life threatening disorders/diseases. my family has a history of diabetes. if i can somehow prevent my children from developing it... i wouldn't mind. however, it's it to make like a prefect baby then that's a little excessive. i don't know if we are capable of making super smart or super attractive babies from genetic engineering yet but i hope we never get to that point.
 
think!IMAGINARIL...
post Sep 14 2006, 08:02 PM
Post #7


.
*******

Group: Member
Posts: 3,264
Joined: Jan 2004
Member No: 761



I've never actually heard of that.

Where did you hear it from?

But then.. They don't exactly know which strain of DNA gives you a disease. Sure, they know for a few, but many are yet to be found.
 
x_curse_of_the_c...
post Sep 15 2006, 03:44 PM
Post #8


Senior Member
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,480
Joined: Jul 2006
Member No: 444,349



QUOTE(Rose-A-Lee @ Sep 14 2006, 7:47 PM) *
i think it depends on what the disease was? if it was life threatening then maybe i would try to change that. but if the baby would be able to lead a normal life with the disorder, then i second what mini says.






exacly what she said



by the way i love the title tongue.gif it's so funny
 
Gypsy Eyes
post Sep 15 2006, 04:57 PM
Post #9


Senior Member
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 7,025
Joined: Feb 2004
Member No: 4,051



I think that it's ok if you are trying to prevent a birth defect, disease or other health-related issue. I don't agree with changing the sex and possible physical attributes.
 
Kontroll
post Sep 16 2006, 09:06 AM
Post #10


Jake - The Unholy Trinity / Premiscuous Poeteer.
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,272
Joined: May 2006
Member No: 411,316



Actually, sometimes after birth children are affected physically by there environment. They actually can slightly change in appearance from what they originally were. And when I say slightly, I mean it to the literal sense. It's a very small change, but still a change in that.
 
marzipan
post Sep 16 2006, 11:04 AM
Post #11


Krista.
*******

Group: Official Member
Posts: 4,380
Joined: Apr 2006
Member No: 391,319



QUOTE(Endless_Symphony @ Sep 14 2006, 8:02 PM) *
there's two types. one makes changes that do not become hereditary and target specific areas. i suppose genetic engineering is okay if it's to change life threatening disorders/diseases. my family has a history of diabetes. if i can somehow prevent my children from developing it... i wouldn't mind. however, it's it to make like a prefect baby then that's a little excessive. i don't know if we are capable of making super smart or super attractive babies from genetic engineering yet but i hope we never get to that point.

I agree. If there was a history of diabetes for example, I'd want to change that so my child wouldn't have a greater chance of getting it.
 
think!IMAGINARIL...
post Sep 16 2006, 01:52 PM
Post #12


.
*******

Group: Member
Posts: 3,264
Joined: Jan 2004
Member No: 761



But then how would they be able to change the genes?
They think that variations in the sequence of the CTLA-4 gene might cause diabetes, but they don't know for sure. And how would they be able to correct it?
 
ANG33ZY
post Sep 16 2006, 02:27 PM
Post #13


skaters gonna skate.
*******

Group: Official Member
Posts: 6,861
Joined: Mar 2004
Member No: 6,336



I don't think I would fix anything..
I still believe God made people a certain way for a reason.
 
*Pl-dot-lS*
post Sep 18 2006, 10:59 AM
Post #14





Guest






QUOTE(ANGEEZY. @ Sep 16 2006, 12:27 PM) *
I don't think I would fix anything..
I still believe God made people a certain way for a reason.


See: harlequin ichthyosis
God's a cruel mofo.
 
demolished
post Sep 18 2006, 06:04 PM
Post #15


Senior Member
*******

Group:
Posts: 8,274
Joined: Mar 2004
Member No: 8,001



The only thing that should be changed is .... acne ;]

REMOVE ACNE PROBLEMS ! SO TEENAGERS WOULDNT BE SO DEPRESSED!
 
think!IMAGINARIL...
post Sep 18 2006, 06:08 PM
Post #16


.
*******

Group: Member
Posts: 3,264
Joined: Jan 2004
Member No: 761



^ Y'know that's usually not why teenagers are depressed. It's usually the hormones + drama + bad days.

I really don't think they should change anything.
And as my last post in here says, they don't have the technology to cure diseases through altering DNA yet. It'll probably take quite a few years to figure everything out.
 
demolished
post Sep 18 2006, 06:13 PM
Post #17


Senior Member
*******

Group:
Posts: 8,274
Joined: Mar 2004
Member No: 8,001



QUOTE(rawr SOCK @ Sep 18 2006, 4:08 PM) *
^ Y'know that's usually not why teenagers are depressed. It's usually the hormones + drama + bad days.

I really don't think they should change anything.
And as my last post in here says, they don't have the technology to cure diseases through altering DNA yet. It'll probably take quite a few years to figure everything out.




Nope.

There are people who avoid social. They are afraid of themselves. (Anti-social)

There are people who are not open to others.

There are people who buy a lot of makeup to cover their pimples. (Wasting money)



There are some theories that stress, chocolate, and oily food causes pimple. Many people assume that it could be the problem to acne. Therefore, a great amount of people avoid these foods as possible.
 
think!IMAGINARIL...
post Sep 18 2006, 06:19 PM
Post #18


.
*******

Group: Member
Posts: 3,264
Joined: Jan 2004
Member No: 761



Ok, so maybe bad days and drama are sometimes caused by acne (I still don't really get it..), but they're not comletely related. Depends on the person's self-esteem/how self-concious they are.

Uhh, yeah. Getting slightly off topic here.. =/
 
bobby james
post Sep 19 2006, 02:18 AM
Post #19


f.a.g.
****

Group: Member
Posts: 137
Joined: Jul 2006
Member No: 432,847



OMG I'm so sick of technology right now it's not even funny, a lot of this stuff is not even called for. People do not realize that with stupid, easy, shit like this they take the freakin purposes out of life more and more until one day it will just be so bland and there is nothin to work for, look foward to, or to be surprised or enthused about. Stupid effers.

So no, I do not agree with shit. :)
 
jackizzle
post Oct 9 2006, 04:10 PM
Post #20


i have to watch the one i love, forget shes loves me.
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,128
Joined: Nov 2004
Member No: 61,209



I watched a movie in science class about parents who were trying to make there child smart- a young Einstein. And another set who were aspring for there child to be tall.

As much as that sounds interesting, I think it is kind of wrong. You shouldn't mess with the nature of your child. Yes it would be cool- and probably make lots of money- if your child was a prodigy. But you should let your child be there own person and let nature take its part and see what your child would grow up to be on its own.

However on another note how people fix there children- if they have spina difida- I think that is okay. Not that it's torture or.. that your just doing to so your child won't get teased. But I would want my child to have a healthy life. If my child has Down's and I could fix it- without harming my baby- then I would do it. But I would NEVER terminate it or not love it just because of it. In fact when I get pregnant I would check for things- so I could be prepared. I guess it depends on the paerson or the situation.
 
femmefatale4160
post Oct 9 2006, 04:11 PM
Post #21


I've got ADD and magic markers. Oh the thrills I will have.
*****

Group: Member
Posts: 624
Joined: Jul 2006
Member No: 445,743



^Ditto. I'm all for natural birth. Unless I can save my kid's life by altering his/her genes, I'm leaving my baby the way they were meant to be.
 
moorepocket
post Oct 9 2006, 04:23 PM
Post #22


Death is a promise given to us at birth
*******

Group: Official Designer
Posts: 4,757
Joined: Mar 2004
Member No: 7,459



yes i would change it. Like blue eyes or a better nose.
 
think!IMAGINARIL...
post Oct 9 2006, 06:21 PM
Post #23


.
*******

Group: Member
Posts: 3,264
Joined: Jan 2004
Member No: 761



^ Why? That's a bit.. superficial, don't you think?
 
*Infinite.*
post Oct 9 2006, 06:40 PM
Post #24





Guest






I suppose its kind of wrong to change someone from who they really are. Although if something was horribly wrong with them, I suppose it would be nice to fix that. Mostly I find it wrong, to change the genes of someone, sounds like its making it so its not even your kid anymore. -shrugs- I wouldn't exactly want to carry someone elses kid in me.
 
pandamonium
post Oct 9 2006, 11:08 PM
Post #25


cheeeesy like theres no tomorrow
*******

Group: Member
Posts: 3,316
Joined: Aug 2004
Member No: 37,142



You guys arent being realistic.

I see where you are all coming from but what happens when this actually occurs, you get to choose from the parents which traits he/she can or cant have but are you going to leave his autism alone, are you gonig to let him/her be blind deaf and mute.

"I want her to have green eyes and black hair, but leave her with diabetes, i dont want to alter her."

In the future i think this will be an option, but its either stick with the baby you have or change everything about your baby. Once everyone has green blue eyes and blonde hair, the special ones are the minorities, the ones with freckles, that have sicknesses.
 

2 Pages V   1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: