That is a possibility, but still questionable.

Even so, a person with no forensic experience? It was his FIRST autopsy. What about the differences in the reports?


There were many videos, the Zapruder is most often used.

the differences can be attributed to human error.

those are descriptions. what to one person could be jagged could be smooth to another. now, if tehre were discrepant photos, that would be evidence. or if they measured the size and wrote that, that would be evidence.

as far as a first autopsy, it was probably because it seemed obvious how he died at the time. It was given to local authorities, and the person in charge probably thought to give the new guy some experience.

i mean, how hard is it to write 'gunshot wound to the head'. i doubt they expected the controversy.

as far as oswald shooting the president, personally, i think he was framed.

sure, i think the shot came from the school book depository. but, if you would look at the area that the bullet could have been shot from, sure, it encloses the window oswald was at, but it centers on the window on the fifth floor.

They both reported different sizes. Not just jagged/smooth.

Also, if they're supposedly highly-trained in their fields (or should be if they acquired their positions), why weren't they somewhat consistent? [/random interjection]

well, autopsies sometimes alter the corpse.

and if the first coroner was as inexerienced as you say, then i don't doubt that was possible.

i think you're reading too much into it. there is no provable discrepancy. there are too many other possible explanations.

The second one was the idiot, not the first.

Ughhh

Yea, If the magic bullet theory can be proven true(A bullet stopped in midair for 2 seconds, which defies the laws of physics, yet countless people believe it)then, I truly believe its a conspiracy. A big one. Quite annoying that people believe the government. I mean, yes you can believe them to a point but, they just cant be trusted. However, I find it pointless to argue becuase there will never be an agreement upon an answer. I'm just voicing my opion.

And if you are interested, watch the movie, JFK with Kevin Costner....I think. It rounds out at around 3 hours....but its probably one of my most favorite movies

Also there is the fact that his brain is missing.

wow... becuase watching a fictional movie is so much more accurate that the government could possiblly be.

Are you joking w/ me?

This is your problem. You're still working off of the conspiracy model. Where both of them sit back to back and face forward with their hands on their laps and their heads looking straight ahead. Watch the Zapruder video, that does not reflect the actual positioning of the bodies. The bullet didn't have to move over to hit Conally's shoulder, Conally had moved his shoulder.

Such a positioning of the two that would make such a trajectory possible may indeed be an accurate recreation of how they were sitting. However, the two concerns I have about this supposed single bullet doing all of the non-deadly wounds are: 1) The autopsy indicates a high back wound that does not penetrate the body, a wound whose end can be felt with a probing finger, and 2) a neck wound that, though appearing to be a small entrance wound in Dallas, was described to be a 7-8 cm jagged gaping wound in Bethesda. Dallas emergency room drs. describe a much smaller cleaner hole, and even the need for a trachetomy would not produce such a large irregular defect.