cB layouts have gone to the dogs. |
![]() ![]() |
cB layouts have gone to the dogs. |
*This Confession* |
![]()
Post
#26
|
Guest ![]() |
Eh I hate to say this
Then why not just not accept that tacky ugly crap and only accept the real stuff so they get their mind right. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#27
|
|
![]() show me a garden thats bursting to life ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 12,303 Joined: Mar 2005 Member No: 115,987 ![]() |
I don't accept the crappy stuff. Or at least try not to. I reject it in a heart beat. I don't even go near the layouts. Last time I did, yeah, that was bad. I stick with graphics.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#28
|
|
![]() in a matter of time ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 7,151 Joined: Aug 2005 Member No: 191,357 ![]() |
Yeah, cB was all about having a high standard of layouts. Now...we've sort of fallen to the public's obsession with shitty brushes and images and started accepting those, too.
I don't think it should be about how popular it's going to be with the layout-using public with bad taste, but rather, upping the standard and attracting the ones with good taste over here. I mean, if they want shitty layouts, then they shouldn't be appreciated here. Blogring, maybe, but not cB. Just kidding. =) |
|
|
*This Confession* |
![]()
Post
#29
|
Guest ![]() |
haha
yea.. I think most of us have a good head on our shoulders and know what were doing. Everyone has different opinions. But I think we have plenty of sense to know what looks good and what doesn't. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#30
|
|
![]() Pokeball, GO! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 2,832 Joined: Jul 2006 Member No: 433,009 ![]() |
haha yea.. I think most of us have a good head on our shoulders and know what were doing. Everyone has different opinions. But I think we have plenty of sense to know what looks good and what doesn't. Yeah, I have faith in you guys. ![]() |
|
|
*StanleyThePanda* |
![]()
Post
#31
|
Guest ![]() |
Yeah, I have faith in you guys. ![]() Well if you saw the ones that are rejected, you would understand ![]() but no, I mean.. I may go through and clean it out a bit. If thats okay with everyone? just a but, like.. if I see anything that is absolutely horrific. haha |
|
|
![]()
Post
#32
|
|
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Posts: 8,274 Joined: Mar 2004 Member No: 8,001 ![]() |
hopefully .. in the future. we'll ban the idea.
layouts are becoming popular. i expect people to be better at it. |
|
|
*Azarel* |
![]()
Post
#33
|
Guest ![]() |
http://www.createblog.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=74442
Uhm. Check out the actual layout preview. Self explanitory. ._.; http://www.createblog.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=76321 Where does your entry text go? http://www.createblog.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=77404 The main image doesn't load. |
|
|
*digital.fragrance* |
![]()
Post
#34
|
Guest ![]() |
I think Mods need to go through all of the skins and weed out the ones that don't function properly... or images don't load...
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#35
|
|
![]() Pocketful of Sunshine ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 8,690 Joined: Nov 2005 Member No: 289,004 ![]() |
^ Yeah, I think so too. I was going through the graphics earlier and there was someone with the same graphic twice. I'd be willing to help, if there is any help needed.
|
|
|
*Azarel* |
![]()
Post
#36
|
Guest ![]() |
I was going through old layouts to get a feel for how the skins have changed, and I noticed that a lot of the text/div alignment in the old layouts do not match up in firefox. But yeah, the few layouts I linked were pretty old. >>;
|
|
|
*digital.fragrance* |
![]()
Post
#37
|
Guest ![]() |
^ I think it would be too hard to elminate for browser compatibility.... sure, it can be done, but that would eliminate A LOT of FABULOUS layouts that classic people made - it'd be too sad.
I think we have to determine which ones don't work at all - by double checking them in both FF and IE browsers |
|
|
*This Confession* |
![]()
Post
#38
|
Guest ![]() |
^in the rules if you actually go check
All layouts don't have to work in all browsers. it isn't required. http://www.createblog.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=77057 its desired but not required. So we can't hold it against the people if they don't work in both browsers. |
|
|
*digital.fragrance* |
![]()
Post
#39
|
Guest ![]() |
^ right, I know that - but there are some that don't work at all
|
|
|
*This Confession* |
![]()
Post
#40
|
Guest ![]() |
well then someone needs to message one of the design staffs and give us the links and someone will take care of it
![]() I think someone said that earlier ![]() |
|
|
*digital.fragrance* |
![]()
Post
#41
|
Guest ![]() |
^ K... but for example - hte OLD Xanga layouts... some of them are well... yeah
http://www.createblog.com/layouts/preview.php?id=117 http://www.createblog.com/layouts/download.php?id=120 |
|
|
*This Confession* |
![]()
Post
#42
|
Guest ![]() |
Okay, well any other ones you can just PM them to me or I suppose you can post them in here, I'll take care of them for now
![]() I'm going through all the layouts actually now But if I miss any you can tell me This may take a few hours ![]() |
|
|
*digital.fragrance* |
![]()
Post
#43
|
Guest ![]() |
^ wish I could help
![]() |
|
|
*mona lisa* |
![]()
Post
#44
|
Guest ![]() |
I've gone into the Graphics section many times to reject any that, in my opinion, are below standard and I'm pretty fair when it comes to that. But it takes such a long time. Not just because of how long the queue is but the number of pages of graphics already submitted, and I mean every category.
![]() I'm going to make my trips to the graphics section more regular. But yes, PM a mod or post in here if it's a long list. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#45
|
|
![]() Yeah, 'tis me. ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 88 Joined: Jul 2006 Member No: 434,337 ![]() |
Heh, wow you guys are pretty fierce. ._.
|
|
|
*digital.fragrance* |
![]()
Post
#46
|
Guest ![]() |
^ we have to be, or else cB will cease to be known for quality graphics/layouts
|
|
|
*lolita kitty* |
![]()
Post
#47
|
Guest ![]() |
People who haven't been exposed to REAL graphics like the crappy stuff. Well I'm pretty sure that all of the design staff have been exposed to real graphics, so why are they accepting these crappy layouts? I think the solution is simple. The mods just need to be more strict when it comes to accepting layouts, and set higher standards. Otherwise, as Rachael said, cB will cease to be known for quality graphics/layouts. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#48
|
|
![]() Two can keep a secret if one of them is dead. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 2,682 Joined: Jun 2005 Member No: 156,187 ![]() |
waaa seems that two of my layouts hit the list.... i mean if its THAT bad... i will remove them
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#49
|
|
![]() What's my name? Janette. and ily. <3 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 2,139 Joined: Apr 2006 Member No: 391,911 ![]() |
I agree 110% with what other people have said.
createBlog simply needs to higher standards. And I will, if it would be appreciated, collect links of images and layouts that don't deserve to be here. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#50
|
|
![]() oooh yeah. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Member Posts: 1,333 Joined: Feb 2006 Member No: 376,533 ![]() |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |