Log In · Register

 
6 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 5 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Do you misuse the word 'gay'?, What do you think about people that do?
What do you do?
You cannot see the results of the poll until you have voted. Please login and cast your vote to see the results of this poll.
Total Votes: 76
Guests cannot vote 
Jorge
post Apr 16 2006, 07:43 PM
Post #51


katie fox is love.
*****

Group: Member
Posts: 530
Joined: Feb 2004
Member No: 5,798



QUOTE(x__Elle. @ Apr 16 2006, 7:21 PM) *
You're being extremely offensive. _dry.gif


It's sarcasm. Read the second or third post and you'll see what I'm getting at. rolleyes.gif
 
flc
post Apr 16 2006, 08:21 PM
Post #52


× Dead as Dillinger. ♥
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,527
Joined: Mar 2006
Member No: 384,615



QUOTE(Jorge @ Apr 16 2006, 7:43 PM) *
It's sarcasm. Read the second or third post and you'll see what I'm getting at. rolleyes.gif
I was being sarcastic too.
 
Teesa
post Apr 16 2006, 08:39 PM
Post #53


crushed.
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 9,432
Joined: Jun 2004
Member No: 20,026



I sometimes misuse it, but I don't really use that word anymore. I'm not really bothered by others who use it, but it is sometimes annoying.
 
crazeegirl411
post Apr 16 2006, 09:08 PM
Post #54


Sharie.
******

Group: Member
Posts: 2,429
Joined: Dec 2003
Member No: 103



QUOTE
the point about bitch was just stupid. as if you cant tell the distinction. as far as f**k goes, i take your point, but my feelings regarding 'gay' isn't so much because the word is offensive in itself, but because it is specifically derogatory towards one group of people. surely, it is better to seperate a group by being sensitive towards them than by using their label in a derogatory way?

Excuse me. Don't give your opinions about what's stupid or not. At least have something to back up why you think it's stupid. There isn't much of a difference, but instead, you just target it at the word "gay." Have I not said already that the people that use it do not use it while thinking of that certain group of people? Being sensitive towards them only means you are thinking of them differently rather than treating them like the same as everyone else.


QUOTE
no, because the use of gay to mean happy predates the use of it to mean homosexual. to expect a cease in the use of it to mean happy would be unreasonable. but it is not unreasonable to expect people to be more sensitive now that it DOES have conotations with a sector of society, i do no find it acceptable for the 'third meaning' to evolve.

That's even more unreasonable than the people that use the word "gay" to describe things or people that are stupid. Meanwhile you are probably accepting other words that have evolved, but you cannot accept the third meaning of gay because you are being sensitive. Which brings back to the first part where you are thinking of them differently rather than treating them like the same kind of people.


QUOTE
could you REALLY not see the paralell that she was trying to draw? you've missed her point utterly by that response.

Then you have missed my point utterly. It is NOT parallel because she is putting a greeting with an adjective. "Hi Nigger" and "That's so gay," is a completely different way to use the word "nigger" and "gay."


QUOTE
well obviously the word stupid will cause offense to th eperson it is directed towards. but there is not a clear third party who could ALSO take offense, and that makes the difference.

Do you ever stop saying something completely just because someone takes offense to it? Ever?

QUOTE
a question for those who find the term to be acceptable: what are your feelings towards people who use 'fag' as an insult? they may or may not mean it to mean 'homosexual', but it still cast a negative light upon people who are actually gay, by implying that their lifestyle is something to be ashamed of, and to direct at people you wish to offend

Same for people that use fag. How many people actually think the person it is directed upon is described as homosexual? The people that actually think homosexuals are different, thinks of it. It is the same kind of name calling with b*tch. To you, obviously from what you have written at the very start, it is different. How is it different? It is directed to a certain group also. Are you viewing gay people differently?

For example, let's say someone lost his leg due to a car accident. It is right to be sensitive about it. But if someone jokes around about it, it doesn't mean that person is meaning to offend the person that lost his leg. It means he is not even thinking about it and treating him like he is just a normal person.
 
*SuzieRawkSoxx*
post Apr 17 2006, 09:26 AM
Post #55





Guest






Umm i dont really even use that word im just like "bro.. go play in traffic with a bag over your head" lmao. tongue.gif
 
*I Shot JFK*
post Apr 17 2006, 11:28 AM
Post #56





Guest






QUOTE(crazeegirl411 @ Apr 17 2006, 3:08 AM) *
Excuse me. Don't give your opinions about what's stupid or not. At least have something to back up why you think it's stupid. There isn't much of a difference, but instead, you just target it at the word "gay." Have I not said already that the people that use it do not use it while thinking of that certain group of people? Being sensitive towards them only means you are thinking of them differently rather than treating them like the same as everyone else.

That's even more unreasonable than the people that use the word "gay" to describe things or people that are stupid. Meanwhile you are probably accepting other words that have evolved, but you cannot accept the third meaning of gay because you are being sensitive. Which brings back to the first part where you are thinking of them differently rather than treating them like the same kind of people.

Then you have missed my point utterly. It is NOT parallel because she is putting a greeting with an adjective. "Hi Nigger" and "That's so gay," is a completely different way to use the word "nigger" and "gay."

Do you ever stop saying something completely just because someone takes offense to it? Ever?
Same for people that use fag. How many people actually think the person it is directed upon is described as homosexual? The people that actually think homosexuals are different, thinks of it. It is the same kind of name calling with b*tch. To you, obviously from what you have written at the very start, it is different. How is it different? It is directed to a certain group also. Are you viewing gay people differently?

For example, let's say someone lost his leg due to a car accident. It is right to be sensitive about it. But if someone jokes around about it, it doesn't mean that person is meaning to offend the person that lost his leg. It means he is not even thinking about it and treating him like he is just a normal person.



well, you said am i worried about 'bitch' offending female dogs...

QUOTE
Then why do people use words like f*ck and and b*tch. Why don't you guys feel offended for female dogs because we call other people b*tches?

that IS just stupid, as well as childish, because it is a trivial, non sensical point, as female dogs are not capable of feeling offended by it... you are equating the emotions of an animal with that of a human being. I certainly feel that that is justification enough for saying it was a stupid point. It was a ridiculou thing to say

- yea, i accept other words that evolved... thats the point. but this one has a predefinition (word?) which makes the third definition offensive. that is the difference between it and othe rnew slang.

- no no... i understood your point, it just wasnt very good. its STILL the same thing, because it is the casual use of a word which may offend... are you honestly too dense to see that?

- to be honest, i cant think of a word which i use frequently which could be offensive to a group of people... if someone could give me a reasobale explanation of why it was offensive, then yes, i would try as much as possible to break that habit.

- cant be botherd to row about fag, because its the same argument over again.

QUOTE
Heh, I guess I will talk with you some more then.

And you patronized me as well, saying, "You're a charmer, aren't you?" Just to let you know.

I won't stop because I see no need to. I usually don't say it outside of school, where there are like, what, two gays who I don't talk to anyway. I could understand what you're saying if I was constantly saying it in a different setting, where there could be tons of gays around. But really. Rarely do I actually say it when a gay person is there.

It's just a three-letter word. I know words can be powerful, but actions DO speak louder than words. If you knew me in real life, you'd know that I respect gays as much as the next guy. Since people know this, they're not going to give me a hard time about using this word.

And why do I wait? BECAUSE IT DOESN'T BOTHER ANYONE I SAY IT AROUND. It seems to be bothering you more than it would a gay person, at least at this moment.

And do you know how arrogant that sounds? Especially with saying that you'll harrass people until they stop saying it? That sounds JUST like my Atheist friend who argues with every Christian around him, trying to get them to denounce their religion. I bet your friends stopped saying not because they finally understood it was wrong, but because they didn't wanna get anymore crap from you.

Let's say, for instance, that gays didn't actually get offended by the use of this word. Just because YOU find it distasteful, you have to make everyone else think the same way you do?

I know you didn't see this part of my post, because you quoted me after I edited it, but I'm just curious: Example: I could, personally, find your username offensive. I could say you're treating Kennedy's assasination as a joke. Just because I alone could find it offensive, are you going to change your username to please one person? Probably not. But I wouldn't keep bugging the hell out of you to change it. I would accept it and move on with my life, like that person should who got offended. They need to realize that a lot of things in life are offensive and they can't get their way with everything everytime. {Even though when I say that something is gay I'm not meaning to calling gay people stupid, like I've said 33586974 times.}

So please, just stop. I have full respect for what you're saying, even if I don't sound like it. But with me, at least, it's a losing battle. Go harrass those other people who also said they use the word.

oh good, i like this conversation.

that wasnt intended to be patronizing, really... sorry if you took it that way. i was just expressing dislike for what you said.

well, see, i think there is a fundamental difference in our philosophies. i see it as my responsibility not to give offense. you see it as others responsibility not to take offense. it boils down to that. it jsut seems stupid to me to acknowledge that something has the potential to cause offense, and then not bother to stop in advance.

i am arrogant, i have a very high opinion of myself, a big ego, and im agressive with my opinions. i make no apologies for it. and frankly, i could care less why they stopped. its all a means to an end, either way.

interesting. see, i can see where you;re going, but the difference to me is that with gay, or nigger, or what have you, there is a spefiic, ready made sector who could potentially be offended, and you see it coming. with my user name, i dont see a strong potential for offense. if it is one person, then yeah, probably i wouldn't be that fussed, because there is no argument which says it is personally degrading, or attaches negative conotations to them. plus, of course, i really did shoot jfk, so it is neither here nor there.

oh, i dont let things go. ever. getting me to stop is an equally losing battle. and i have an equal respect for what you say. 'I may not agree with what you have to say, but I will defend to your death the right to say it'. <--- words i live by
 
*Girthy*
post Apr 17 2006, 11:43 AM
Post #57





Guest






Voltaire, nice touch. Anywho....

QUOTE(I Shot JFK @ Apr 17 2006, 9:28 AM) *
interesting. see, i can see where you;re going, but the difference to me is that with gay, or nigger, or what have you, there is a spefiic, ready made sector who could potentially be offended

Ok, so are you implying gay people are offended when being called gay?
 
*I Shot JFK*
post Apr 17 2006, 12:00 PM
Post #58





Guest






well no. im saying that when the word 'gay' is used to mean stupid or whatever, it attaches a negative conotation to the word in its other forms, which is offensive. was that not clear?
 
*Girthy*
post Apr 17 2006, 12:10 PM
Post #59





Guest






I agree I agree, but if the given situation were in a group of friends who knows that you are joking, would that still not be acceptable?
 
*I Shot JFK*
post Apr 17 2006, 01:24 PM
Post #60





Guest






QUOTE(Girthy @ Apr 17 2006, 6:10 PM) *
I agree I agree, but if the given situation were in a group of friends who knows that you are joking, would that still not be acceptable?

well that depends. even if i knew someone was joking, or didnt mean any offense, i would still find it distasteful
 
fatal emotions
post Apr 17 2006, 01:50 PM
Post #61


Ehh...
***

Group: Member
Posts: 36
Joined: Jul 2005
Member No: 175,878



I've misused the word "gay" alot in the passed.. I've cut down on it alot because some people found it offensive.
 
visualfusion
post Apr 17 2006, 02:03 PM
Post #62


Senior Member
*****

Group: Member
Posts: 699
Joined: Mar 2004
Member No: 7,274



In my opinion, only people with little self-esteem would be offended by offensive words. If you know the word doesn't apply to you, you should be laughing at the idiot that says it, not crying a river about it.
 
Paul M. is baaac...
post Apr 17 2006, 02:04 PM
Post #63


Senior Member
*****

Group: Member
Posts: 535
Joined: Nov 2005
Member No: 301,185



Funily enough, anybody I've used it on hasn't found it offensive.
 
Jorge
post Apr 17 2006, 02:05 PM
Post #64


katie fox is love.
*****

Group: Member
Posts: 530
Joined: Feb 2004
Member No: 5,798



I use it daily, I could really care less if people get offended. It all falls back on freedom of speech. It's not profanity, it's nothing racial, vulgar. But it can offend people and it's their choice how to handle it.
 
Paul M. is baaac...
post Apr 17 2006, 02:08 PM
Post #65


Senior Member
*****

Group: Member
Posts: 535
Joined: Nov 2005
Member No: 301,185



Well, to take it badly, I believe you would have to think a bit too much into the whole thing, or, to a certain extent, suffer from a mild case of...being homophobic.
 
*I Shot JFK*
post Apr 17 2006, 02:14 PM
Post #66





Guest






QUOTE(visualfusion @ Apr 17 2006, 8:03 PM) *
In my opinion, only people with little self-esteem would be offended by offensive words. If you know the word doesn't apply to you, you should be laughing at the idiot that says it, not crying a river about it.

your font is irritating.

and isnt trying to stop the person in question mor eproductive than just laughing at them?

QUOTE
I use it daily, I could really care less if people get offended. It all falls back on freedom of speech. It's not profanity, it's nothing racial, vulgar. But it can offend people and it's their choice how to handle it.


well obviously its your legal right to use it. it's just unpleasant. and doesnt the offended party have a right to interpret the vulgarity of a term, as much as the one who used the term? you say its nothing racial... then what isyour view on the use of 'nigger'? do you no tsee the parallel?
 
Jorge
post Apr 17 2006, 02:17 PM
Post #67


katie fox is love.
*****

Group: Member
Posts: 530
Joined: Feb 2004
Member No: 5,798



But do homosexual people call eachother Gay's?
 
*I Shot JFK*
post Apr 17 2006, 02:19 PM
Post #68





Guest






well they refer to the 'gay population', and refer to one another as being gay, so i suppose so, yes. why?
 
uLoVeMikeRoch
post Apr 17 2006, 02:25 PM
Post #69


Wow, i dont know whats going on...
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,439
Joined: Apr 2004
Member No: 10,977



QUOTE(Teenage Mutant Ninja Meg @ Apr 15 2006, 1:59 PM) *
I messed up the poll again... so, if you want to vote for the first one, just post it in a reply. Or one of the mods can fix it.

Personally, I find people who use the word "gay" to mean stupid is incredibly offensive. When a person says something like "THAT'S SO GAY!", I swear a blood vessel pops in my head. And when I bring it up with my friends, they say things like, "I have gay friends and they say it too!" Well, your gay friends are the only homosexuals in the whole world.

Anyway, what do you think of it? You obviously know my answer.

[I hope this is in the proper forum, if not feel free to move it!]

Haha, Hell yes I do.
 
NoSex
post Apr 17 2006, 03:07 PM
Post #70


in the reverb chamber.
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 4,022
Joined: Nov 2005
Member No: 300,308



This is the thing: I don't adhere to the predominant superstitions of language. Most notably, the idea that certain sounds, when put together to form words, can become inherently wrong, bad, and offensive. However, I do have my standards in economy of language as well as standards that slip into regions of speech.

I might go so far as to say that I am not so much offended by it's derogatory use but rather, it's unimaginative, beaten to death, dry, ignorant, and low essence. Of course it makes absolutely no sense, given that you do not actually believe homosexuality to be inherently derogatory, to use the word "gay" in the manners described in this thread. Why should we use it in such ways? What is the point?

We have all heard it used, and by the age of 12 it really isn't anything special. Any half-witted simpleton can declare the "gayness" of his most despised exotic food, or his closest rival, or that door that slammed shut on his dumb ass. We've all heard it, and we have to realize how little sense it truly makes. Also, it's important to realize how dull it is. It's just shortsighted and worthless. I won't exactly think low of you for using it, nor will I exactly become offended, but I might suspect a bit of slowness on your part.

yawn.gif
 
Jorge
post Apr 17 2006, 03:08 PM
Post #71


katie fox is love.
*****

Group: Member
Posts: 530
Joined: Feb 2004
Member No: 5,798



Yes, but they don't all go around using it a misleading way unlike what you stayed as using the n word.
 
*Zatanna*
post Apr 17 2006, 03:15 PM
Post #72





Guest






Every once in a while I'll say something like, "that's so gay!" I honestly don't mean any harm. I understand that it could be considered offensive to some, so I try to limit how many times (if at all anymore) I say that, particularly because my son repeats EVERYTHING I say.
 
*I Shot JFK*
post Apr 17 2006, 04:14 PM
Post #73





Guest






QUOTE(Jorge @ Apr 17 2006, 9:08 PM) *
Yes, but they don't all go around using it a misleading way unlike what you stayed as using the n word.

i think you may have over thought what i said...
 
tanichick
post Apr 17 2006, 05:24 PM
Post #74


The Russian™
****

Group: Member
Posts: 212
Joined: May 2005
Member No: 136,554



I always missuse the word gay like...

"oh wow, thats sooo freaking gay!"

:( I don't mean to it just comes out, and I know that it affects many people in negative ways...
 
parallel
post Apr 17 2006, 05:27 PM
Post #75


TOISU!!
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,996
Joined: Jan 2005
Member No: 92,516



QUOTE(I Shot JFK @ Apr 15 2006, 11:04 AM) *
no worries. i made a similar thread myself AGES ago... kind of just turned into a massive argument. was great fun!

HAHAH ohboy.

I didn't vote, but I don't usually say it. It slips sometimes and yea.
Then you get attacked verbally by the people who don't "agree" with using the word that way.
Ahh whateva.
 

6 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 5 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: