subforum reorganization |
  |
 Feb 10 2006, 05:16 PM
Post
#26
|
|
 dripping destruction  Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 7,282 Joined: Jun 2004 Member No: 21,929  |
and really, people go into both, so it's not like it would be different posting a girls only topic in a common locker.
|
|
|
|
| *not_your_average* |
Feb 10 2006, 06:34 PM
Post
#27
|
|
Guest |
Hold up; what happened to current events?
|
|
|
|
| *Zatanna* |
Feb 10 2006, 06:50 PM
Post
#28
|
|
Guest |
^
QUOTE(micron @ Feb 9 2006, 9:55 PM) alright, im going to use my special executive powers to make some changes. like, right now. i remember there was a time in cb history changes were made shiftly. seems like it doesnt happen often anymore. today its more like ... deliberation, deliberation, deliberation until the topic fades into everyone's memories. so, in the spirit of the old cb, when cb was still new, i shall remove the following subforums in interests: -current events -health -sports and move them to the louge. this way we can have a more active lounge again! weeee!  
|
|
|
|
| *mona lisa* |
Feb 10 2006, 07:59 PM
Post
#29
|
|
Guest |
Justin, that sounds like a nice idea. Michael is right; the two can't really be differentiated by much. It would take a lot of moving and merging. What would be a good name for it?
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 11 2006, 06:30 AM
Post
#30
|
|
 Another ditch in the road... you keep moving Group: Member Posts: 6,281 Joined: Jan 2005 Member No: 85,152 |
i agree with michael and justin regarding locker rooms...
if they were merged, perhaps it could fall under the same general heading as relationships? |
|
|
|
| *Weird addiction* |
Feb 11 2006, 07:31 AM
Post
#31
|
|
Guest |
QUOTE(racoons > you @ Feb 11 2006, 1:30 PM) i agree with michael and justin regarding locker rooms... if they were merged, perhaps it could fall under the same general heading as relationships? Bad idea. "omg my first perioddddd" doesn't exactly fit into relationships. |
|
|
|
|
Feb 11 2006, 10:09 AM
Post
#32
|
|
|
Another ditch in the road... you keep moving Group: Member Posts: 6,281 Joined: Jan 2005 Member No: 85,152 |
i meant they could be subforums under a general heading
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 11 2006, 10:21 AM
Post
#33
|
|
|
dripping destruction Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 7,282 Joined: Jun 2004 Member No: 21,929 |
the locker rooms?
|
|
|
|
| *Weird addiction* |
Feb 11 2006, 10:23 AM
Post
#34
|
|
Guest |
^ yes, that's what he means. I don't agree with it though.
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 11 2006, 10:23 AM
Post
#35
|
|
 i've never wanted anything rationale. Group: Staff Alumni Posts: 8,449 Joined: May 2004 Member No: 19,045 |
^x2That sounds nice. I like getting rid of the seperate lockers.
I also really like Anna's set up. Yes, it would take a lot of merging and what not, but it would make more sense. You could even hire some people just for that if you don't want to do the work. |
|
|
|
|
Feb 11 2006, 10:40 AM
Post
#36
|
|
|
Another ditch in the road... you keep moving Group: Member Posts: 6,281 Joined: Jan 2005 Member No: 85,152 |
let me clarify:
i menat that relationships and a merged locker room could be seperate subforums under the same general heading |
|
|
|
| *mipadi* |
Feb 11 2006, 12:32 PM
Post
#37
|
|
Guest |
QUOTE(mona lisa @ Feb 10 2006, 7:59 PM) Justin, that sounds like a nice idea. Michael is right; the two can't really be differentiated by much. It would take a lot of moving and merging. What would be a good name for it? Maybe just call it The Locker Room? |
|
|
|
| *not_your_average* |
Feb 11 2006, 01:28 PM
Post
#38
|
|
Guest |
NO.
wtf. that's it. i'm gone. |
|
|
|
|
Feb 11 2006, 01:33 PM
Post
#39
|
|
|
Another ditch in the road... you keep moving Group: Member Posts: 6,281 Joined: Jan 2005 Member No: 85,152 |
QUOTE(not_your_average @ Feb 11 2006, 7:28 PM) NO. wtf. that's it. i'm gone. what? im inclinded to say calm down, as i detected angry overtones... |
|
|
|
| *not_your_average* |
Feb 11 2006, 01:40 PM
Post
#40
|
|
Guest |
QUOTE(racoons > you @ Feb 11 2006, 1:33 PM) what? im inclinded to say calm down, as i detected angry overtones... check your PMs. |
|
|
|
| *disco infiltrator* |
Feb 11 2006, 02:24 PM
Post
#41
|
|
Guest |
Perhaps we could have a merged locker for the less gender-specific topics, and in that, we could have separate girls/boys? Cause there are some gender-specific topics...
|
|
|
|
| *incoherent* |
Feb 11 2006, 02:38 PM
Post
#42
|
|
Guest |
QUOTE(disco infiltrator @ Feb 11 2006, 1:24 PM) Perhaps we could have a merged locker for the less gender-specific topics, and in that, we could have separate girls/boys? Cause there are some gender-specific topics... thats true, but still yet, guys and girls still post in gender-related topics even if they are not of the gender.
|
|
|
|
| *disco infiltrator* |
Feb 11 2006, 02:41 PM
Post
#43
|
|
Guest |
So? They're still gender-specific. "i'm leaking into my panties and it looks like cauliflower" may interest some guys, but I'm sure most aren't ready to see that up and out there.
|
|
|
|
| *mzkandi* |
Feb 11 2006, 04:21 PM
Post
#44
|
|
Guest |
QUOTE(disco infiltrator @ Feb 11 2006, 2:24 PM) Perhaps we could have a merged locker for the less gender-specific topics, and in that, we could have separate girls/boys? Cause there are some gender-specific topics... I agree with that Sammi, I'm in the girls' locker room alot and there way more gender specfic topics than topics that can apply to both boys and girls. |
|
|
|
| *Azarel* |
Feb 17 2006, 09:21 PM
Post
#45
|
|
Guest |
-- ·Introductions
-- ·The Lounge -- ·Entertainment ---- ·Anime/Manga ---- ·Literature ---- ·Movies/Celebrities ---- ·Music ---- ·Television (+ commercial sports) -- ·Interests ---- ·Current Events/Debate ---- ·Hobbies (eg. cooking, leisure sports, whatever) ---- ·Technology ---- ·Writing -- ·Pictures -- ·Relationships -- ·Lockers (including health) ---- ·Gender Specific Topics -- ·Interactive (These forums don't add to your post count.) ---- ·Forum Games ---- ·Humor ---- ·Academics For the lockers, I was thinking, "Since most girls/guys reply to the others' topics, why not just have one generalized locker?" like many other members have already suggested. Gender-specific topics relating to periods or whatever could go into a subforum within the lockers with a rule having people specify in the title which gender their topic is directed to in the thread ("MALE" or "FEMALE" before the topic title). Not sure if that would work. |
|
|
|
| *tweeak* |
Feb 17 2006, 09:24 PM
Post
#46
|
|
Guest |
If you're going to combine the lockers, I don't see why health topics wouldn't also fit in there...particularly since it's not actually an interest
|
|
|
|
| *Azarel* |
Feb 17 2006, 09:26 PM
Post
#47
|
|
Guest |
Touché. Edited.
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 17 2006, 09:38 PM
Post
#48
|
|
 Don't wake ghostie. Group: Official Member Posts: 3,546 Joined: Jan 2004 Member No: 2,405 |
I really like Azarel's, I mean really really. I don't see anything wrong with it.
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 17 2006, 09:48 PM
Post
#49
|
|
 Senior Member Group: Posts: 8,274 Joined: Mar 2004 Member No: 8,001 |
Combining Current Events/Debate would be funny. The current debate topics won’t be easy to search. I have a feeling that people will post millions of current events which would cover the debate topic.
QUOTE For the lockers, I was thinking, "Since most girls/guys reply to the others' topics, why not just have one generalized locker?" like many other members have already suggested. Gender-specific topics relating to periods or whatever could go into a subforum within the lockers with a rule having people specify in the title which gender their topic is directed to in the thread ("MALE" or "FEMALE" before the topic title). Not sure if that would work.  I think it's better to have 2 separate forums for genders than to have topic titles mentioned "male" or "female". What is the big difference?
|
|
|
|
| *disco infiltrator* |
Feb 17 2006, 11:48 PM
Post
#50
|
|
Guest |
If we're just going to label topics Male/Female, then do we really need a subforum for them? Just put them with the rest.
|
|
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: