Log In · Register

 

Debate Rules

Here are the general forum rules that you must follow before you start any debate topics. Please make sure you've read and followed all directions.

Debate.

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
PETA : Good or Bad?
medic
post Oct 14 2005, 11:19 PM
Post #1


Seoul Rocks!
*****

Group: Member
Posts: 936
Joined: Jun 2005
Member No: 155,811



I found some good information on PETA today research class today, Here is just one artical that this website has to offer ( http://PETAkillsanimals.com )

QUOTE
PETA's Dirty Secret

Hypocrisy is the mother of all credibility problems, and People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) has it in spades. While loudly complaining about the "unethical" treatment of animals by restaurant owners, grocers, farmers, scientists, anglers, and countless other Americans, the group has its own dirty little secret.

PETA kills animals. By the thousands.

From July 1998 through the end of 2004, PETA killed over 12,400 dogs, cats, and other "companion animals" -- at its Norfolk, Virginia headquarters. That's more than five defenseless animals every day. Not counting the dogs and cats PETA spayed and neutered, the group put to death over 85 percent of the animals it took in during 2003 alone. And its angel-of-death pattern shows no sign of changing.

» skeptical? click here to see the proof

On its 2002 federal income-tax return, PETA claimed a $9,370 write-off for a giant walk-in freezer, the kind most people use as a meat locker or for ice-cream storage. But animal-rights activists don't eat meat or dairy foods. So far, the group hasn't confirmed the obvious -- that it's using the appliance to store the bodies of its victims.

In 2000, when the Associated Press first noted PETA's Kervorkian-esque tendencies, PETA president Ingrid Newkirk complained that actually taking care of animals costs more than killing them. "We could become a no-kill shelter immediately," she admitted.

PETA kills animals. Because it has other financial priorities.

PETA raked in nearly $29 million last year in income, much of it raised from pet owners who think their donations actually help animals. Instead, the group spends huge sums on programs equating people who eat chicken with Nazis, scaring young children away from drinking milk, recruiting children into the radical animal-rights lifestyle, and intimidating businessmen and their families in their own neighborhoods. PETA has also spent tens of thousands of dollars defending arsonists and other violent extremists.

PETA claims it engages in outrageous media-seeking stunts "for the animals." But which animals? Carping about the value of future two-piece dinners while administering lethal injections to puppies and kittens isn't ethical. It's hypocritical -- with a death toll that PETA would protest if it weren't their own doing.

PETA kills animals. And its leaders dare lecture the rest of us.



I was wondering your opinions or views on this, I was in complete shock, and well I still am...
 
fameONE
post Oct 14 2005, 11:42 PM
Post #2


^_^
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 8,141
Joined: Jan 2005
Member No: 91,466



Any believe to an unreasonable extreme normally causes erratic and just plain fcuked up behavior to surface.

When it comes to the fair treatment of animals, I'm all for it. Hell, I used to be a vegetarian. So, I can udnerstand both sides of the 'Save The Animals/Dude, Its The Food Chain' argment.

As far as this is concerned, it doesn't surprise me that the preacher needs to follow his own preachin's. Shit's foul. But, I was never big on PETA. They're too imposing.
 
sadolakced acid
post Oct 14 2005, 11:57 PM
Post #3


dripping destruction
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 7,282
Joined: Jun 2004
Member No: 21,929



i particularily don't like PETA's targeting of children.

i think PETA should be classified as a religious organization, and thus banned from schools.
 
medic
post Oct 15 2005, 12:09 AM
Post #4


Seoul Rocks!
*****

Group: Member
Posts: 936
Joined: Jun 2005
Member No: 155,811



QUOTE(sadolakced acid @ Oct 14 2005, 10:57 PM)
i particularily don't like PETA's targeting of children.

i think PETA should be classified as a religious organization, and thus banned from schools.
*


I totally agree with you, they target kids, and in there new "Comic Book" target children to think that there parents are the bad people...

There is a point to where doing it, and distributing kid friendly books is fine, but take a look at that PDF. It shows animals that has been skinned, and the front cover alone shows that PETA does not have the children in there minds. If I showed that to a little kid, they would cry, the second page is discussing.

I would not associate myself with a organization that does that to children, let alone work for the suns of a b**ches.
Here is a PDF copy of the new PETA "Comic Book"

FRONT COVER


http://www.consumerfreedom.com/downloads/r...17_petakids.pdf
 
*not_your_average*
post Oct 15 2005, 03:31 PM
Post #5





Guest






I used to be a PETA supporter. :x
After reading that article, however, I'm glad I got bored with PETA.
PETA is really a propoganda spewer. So they are bad.
 
FREEcandies
post Oct 15 2005, 03:38 PM
Post #6


Senior Member
***

Group: Member
Posts: 70
Joined: Sep 2005
Member No: 246,385



I saw a poster in a research lab that shows groups of PETA protesters and the caption says "Animal research is keeping these protesters alive longer." Been looking for that poster.
 
medic
post Oct 15 2005, 03:54 PM
Post #7


Seoul Rocks!
*****

Group: Member
Posts: 936
Joined: Jun 2005
Member No: 155,811



I like how PETA has repeatedly attacked research foundations like the March of Dimes, the Pediatric AIDS Foundation, and the American Cancer Society, because they support animal-based research that might uncover cures for birth defects and life-threatening diseases. PETA president Ingrid Newkirk has said that “even if animal research resulted in a cure for AIDS, we would be against it.”
 
sadolakced acid
post Oct 15 2005, 09:34 PM
Post #8


dripping destruction
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 7,282
Joined: Jun 2004
Member No: 21,929



i like how PETA's goal is to have bunnies and foxes and dogs and cats and cows all running free in the wild, free from humans...

and they decide to accomplish this by killing over 95% of the animals set to thier shelter.
 
Gypsy Eyes
post Oct 15 2005, 09:41 PM
Post #9


Senior Member
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 7,025
Joined: Feb 2004
Member No: 4,051



I think the original intent of peta was good, but over the years it has gone from just trying to save animals to just plain propaganda and money.
 
sadolakced acid
post Oct 15 2005, 09:52 PM
Post #10


dripping destruction
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 7,282
Joined: Jun 2004
Member No: 21,929



^ the same could be said for hitler
 
super_grover08
post Oct 16 2005, 12:28 PM
Post #11


Senior Member
*****

Group: Member
Posts: 445
Joined: Mar 2005
Member No: 111,988



i think that its stupid to try and save every animal in the world and turn all humans into veg-heads. people have been killing and eating animals since the stone age. and just think, if we didnt kill any animals, they would overpopulate and make their way into the suburbs and big citys.
 
technicolour
post Oct 16 2005, 07:01 PM
Post #12


show me a garden thats bursting to life
********

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 12,303
Joined: Mar 2005
Member No: 115,987



QUOTE(sadolakced acid @ Oct 15 2005, 9:52 PM)
^ the same could be said for hitler
*


True...

PETA: People Eating Tasty Animals

Peta are just a whole bunch of hypocrites. They're annoying, and what they are trying to get is just out of this world.
 
Gypsy Eyes
post Oct 16 2005, 07:10 PM
Post #13


Senior Member
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 7,025
Joined: Feb 2004
Member No: 4,051



QUOTE(super_grover08 @ Oct 16 2005, 12:28 PM)
i think that its stupid to try and save every animal in the world and turn all humans into veg-heads.  people have been killing and eating animals since the stone age.  and just think, if we didnt kill any animals, they would overpopulate and make their way into the suburbs and big citys.
*

and if we didn't kill the animals and their habitat to make the suburbs and big cities there wouldn't be this problem to start with.
 
medic
post Oct 16 2005, 09:22 PM
Post #14


Seoul Rocks!
*****

Group: Member
Posts: 936
Joined: Jun 2005
Member No: 155,811



QUOTE(Gypsy Eyes @ Oct 16 2005, 6:10 PM)
and if we didn't kill the animals and their habitat to make the suburbs and big cities there wouldn't be this problem to start with.
*


It was bound to happen. God gave us sex organs for a reason. When the population grows, so does its surroundings.
 
mai_z
post Oct 17 2005, 06:06 PM
Post #15


unify and defeat... divide and crumble
******

Group: Member
Posts: 2,759
Joined: Mar 2004
Member No: 6,379



I'm all for being nice to the little bunny, but the PETA is way too extreme. Also, they are hypocrites. Honestly, who believes that "Better dead than eaten" shit?
 
SillyCourtney
post Oct 17 2005, 06:08 PM
Post #16


Queen of Random Information
*****

Group: Member
Posts: 825
Joined: Jun 2005
Member No: 157,057



PETA is bad, but telling my friends that pisses them off. Oh well, I can't make everyone happy and they need to realize PETA isn't all about saving animals.
 
LordAwesome
post Oct 19 2005, 06:33 PM
Post #17


Senior Member
***

Group: Member
Posts: 31
Joined: Aug 2005
Member No: 203,465



oh yeah, i love PETA they send convicted arsenists to schools to tell children how to make bombs.....mmmmm yeah, they are so great. responsable, and all that stuff.....they are a disgusting organization that have gained suport through misconception and excesive lies...
 
simx
post Oct 22 2005, 01:31 AM
Post #18


"Silly me, I thought this was a free country"
******

Group: Human
Posts: 1,666
Joined: Nov 2004
Member No: 60,913



QUOTE(Gypsy Eyes @ Oct 15 2005, 9:41 PM)
I think the original intent of peta was good, but over the years it has gone from just trying to save animals to just plain propaganda and money.
*

I agree... like most organizations in America money becomes much more important than their cause.
 
medic
post Oct 22 2005, 10:45 PM
Post #19


Seoul Rocks!
*****

Group: Member
Posts: 936
Joined: Jun 2005
Member No: 155,811



QUOTE(simx @ Oct 22 2005, 12:31 AM)
I agree... like most organizations in America money becomes much more important than their cause.
*


You as well as I know that its not JUST organizations in America. Yet allot of the worlds largest, and well known organizations like The Red Cross or The United Way are American organizations which raise billions of dollars a year, but keep only one or two billion of it, for advertisements and other stuff.
 
Genuine_Essence
post Oct 29 2005, 11:57 PM
Post #20


Senior Member
****

Group: Member
Posts: 119
Joined: Oct 2005
Member No: 279,574



Im all for Saving the animals and cruelity free!!!!hey should have rights like we do! and if PETA preches that then thats great and i support them. But i wont support them if there organization is more about the money then the animals!!! thats jus wrong stubborn.gif
 
*not_your_average*
post Oct 30 2005, 01:53 PM
Post #21





Guest






QUOTE(Genuine_Essence @ Oct 29 2005, 11:57 PM)
Im all for Saving the animals and cruelity free!!!!hey should have rights like we do! and if PETA preches that then thats great and i support them. But i wont support them if there organization is more about the money then the animals!!! thats jus wrong stubborn.gif
*


...
That's what the debate is about. It's great that you're all about saving the animals and stuff, but you're supposed to state your opinion, then back it up with facts.
 
sikdragon
post Oct 30 2005, 02:05 PM
Post #22


Bardic Nation
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,113
Joined: Aug 2004
Member No: 38,059



beastiality is wrong. Which is what peta is, according to south park.
 
agirlnamed_aly
post Nov 7 2005, 11:08 PM
Post #23


I'd rather make mistakes than break.
****

Group: Member
Posts: 121
Joined: Mar 2005
Member No: 117,869



As some have said, PETA might've had its good intentions from the get-go, but nothing stays corruption free for long in this country.

In my opinion, PETA's just another trend bandwagon for chemically imbalanced Good Charlotte fans to jump onto and "stick it to the man". Targetting a younger audience makes them just as guilty as those cigarette adds depicting smoking as glamorous and exotic - they try and convince people to believe in their propaganda, and who better than the impressionable youth of America?
 

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: