warnings and suspensions Options

[*tweeak*]

Now, there's a similar topic, but this is more specific.

Shouldn't there be a limit that if a person gets warned (or, uh, IP banned?) a certain amount of times, that they'll be automatically supended for any further misdemeanor? If we're just going to keep warning people but don't take any real actions under the guise of second chances, they won't stop. I mean, the warnings along won't do anything. After the first one or two, shouldn't it be required that stricter actions be taken? I don't mean extremely harsh or anything, and I don't want to bring in specifics, but some things seem a bit not quite right.

DO NOT BRING ME INTO THIS. That is drama that does NOT need to be continued.

[*mzkandi*]

I agree. Simply warning people with without any futher punishment if their actions continues or gets worse doesnt solve anything. I think after so many warnings you should get suspended and after so many suspensions a possiblity of an IP ban should folow (just a suggestion). Like, for example. after two warnings in say one months time would be followed by a suspension. If that member comes back from that suspension and decides he/she doesnt want to abide by the rules, another suspension would follow. After that suspension a possiblity of an IP ban would be a consequence should that member decide to act out again depending on the offense.

[*incoherent*]

I agree.  Simply warning people with without any futher punishment if their actions continues or gets worse doesnt solve anything. I think after so many warnings  you should get suspended and after so many suspensions a possiblity of an IP ban should folow (just a suggestion). Like, for example. afrer two warnings in say one months time would be followed by a suspension. If that member comes back from that suspension and decides he/she doesnt want to abide by the rules, another suspension would follow. After that suspension a possiblity of an IP would be a consequence should that member decide to act out again depending on the offense.

agreed. i was talking to nicki about it...i think. they shouldnt just be banned, but be allowed to come back and be given a second chance.

[racoons > you]

yes. i agree.

there is a reason these people have been banned. there are only so many chances people can be given

[*mzkandi*]

So lets put numbers into this. How many chances do you think should be given before a suspension or possible ip ban is followed?

I say two warnings (one verbal, one raised) should be given before the possiblity of suspension may be carried out. And maybe two to three suspensions before a possible ip ban may be carried. Of coures, all of this would depend on the offense so these numbers can be played around with.

[*incoherent*]

^
that sounds like a good idea. verbal warnings are pretty leniant, but they know they have one. so, if they go so far as to get their level raised, they should be considered for suspension.

[racoons > you]

i agree. shall we vot eon that format

So lets put numbers into this. How many chances do you think should be given before a suspension or possible ip ban is followed?

I say two warnings (one verbal, one raised) should be given before the possiblity of suspension may be carried out. And maybe two to three suspensions before a possible ip ban may be carried. Of coures, all of this would depend on the offense so these numbers can be played around with.

all in favour of kiera's format, say aye, all those opposed, say nay

aye

[*disco infiltrator*]

Aye.

[*mzkandi*]

aye.

[*incoherent*]

aye

[*tweeak*]

aye

[*mipadi*]

Aye

[Rachel]

Aye

[Heathasm]

aye

[*incoherent*]

thats 8 ayes already.

i think the motion passed.

[racoons > you]

indeed. motion passed, someone update the passed bylaws for me, por favor

= )

[*incoherent*]

added

topic closed