Log In · Register

 
 
Closed TopicStart new topic
@ picture unquoters
sixfive
post Jan 25 2009, 07:08 PM
Post #1



*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 7,019
Joined: May 2008
Member No: 653,768



sup dawgs i heard you like to unquote image tags in pictures but tags of images in quotes is okay so if you could stop unquoting my image tag ill stop quoting your unimage tag
 
brooklyneast05
post Jan 25 2009, 10:17 PM
Post #2


I'm Jc
********

Group: Mentor
Posts: 13,619
Joined: Jul 2006
Member No: 437,556



no clue what you're asking about
 
sixfive
post Jan 25 2009, 10:26 PM
Post #3



*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 7,019
Joined: May 2008
Member No: 653,768



Oh, I just noticed that in a few posts people are removing image tags on quotes and leaving notes saying to remove, etc. I was just under the impression that people were okay with that so long as it wasn't blatantly leaving tags because of laziness or some other non productive factor.

i.e. leaving tags for the sake of leaving tags, or leaving tags because your quote directly pertained to one image in particular
 
Gigi
post Jan 25 2009, 10:32 PM
Post #4


in a matter of time
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 7,151
Joined: Aug 2005
Member No: 191,357



I was under the impression that removing img tags was not required (i.e. you wouldn't be penalized if you did it), but preferred. So I don't really mind someone else removing them for me if they felt like it.
 
emberfly
post Jan 25 2009, 11:12 PM
Post #5


kthxbai
******

Group: Official Designer
Posts: 2,832
Joined: Feb 2008
Member No: 621,203



WTF. Why are all the old rules going away?
 
sixfive
post Jan 25 2009, 11:20 PM
Post #6



*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 7,019
Joined: May 2008
Member No: 653,768



QUOTE(Gigi @ Jan 25 2009, 09:32 PM) *
I was under the impression that removing img tags was not required (i.e. you wouldn't be penalized if you did it), but preferred. So I don't really mind someone else removing them for me if they felt like it.

Understandable, but I figured some people quote one image out of say ten because their comment pertains directly to that image, and with the quoted image tag it makes it way easier to understand what they're trying to convey.

No worries ^____^
 
Gigi
post Jan 25 2009, 11:22 PM
Post #7


in a matter of time
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 7,151
Joined: Aug 2005
Member No: 191,357



^x2 Uh, why does it bother you so much?

Besides, the "old rule" itself was implemented in place of a previous old rule, now we're just returning back to it.

QUOTE(kryogenix @ Jan 25 2009, 08:20 PM) *
Understandable, but I figured some people quote one image out of say ten because their comment pertains directly to that image, and with the quoted image tag it makes it way easier to understand what they're trying to convey.

No worries ^____^

I don't really mind either way if the picture or the link is up since my internet connection can handle that easily. If I was really that curious I'd probably just click the link. I can see how it could clarify things though.
 
sixfive
post Jan 25 2009, 11:22 PM
Post #8



*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 7,019
Joined: May 2008
Member No: 653,768



It doesn't bother me brahski :] Not every thread I make is in malice :(

mashed potatoes and gravy, cranberry SAUCEEEE
 
hypnotique
post Jan 25 2009, 11:24 PM
Post #9


Live long and prosper.
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 5,525
Joined: Nov 2006
Member No: 478,024



QUOTE(emberfly @ Jan 25 2009, 10:12 PM) *
WTF. Why are all the old rules going away?

Because theres really no point to warning someone for f*cking image tags.

However asking stupid questions is still being debated : whistling.gif whistling.gif
 
Gigi
post Jan 25 2009, 11:29 PM
Post #10


in a matter of time
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 7,151
Joined: Aug 2005
Member No: 191,357



QUOTE(kryogenix @ Jan 25 2009, 08:22 PM) *
It doesn't bother me brahski :] Not every thread I make is in malice :(

mashed potatoes and gravy, cranberry SAUCEEEE

No no, I didn't think that your question was in malice, that's just what I was personally thinking about it.

God I don't know how to sound friendly online, LOL.
 
sixfive
post Jan 25 2009, 11:30 PM
Post #11



*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 7,019
Joined: May 2008
Member No: 653,768



QUOTE(Gigi @ Jan 25 2009, 10:29 PM) *
No no, I didn't think that your question was in malice, that's just what I was personally thinking about it.

God I don't know how to sound friendly online, LOL.

learn to play noob
 
Gigi
post Jan 25 2009, 11:34 PM
Post #12


in a matter of time
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 7,151
Joined: Aug 2005
Member No: 191,357



sad.gif
 
emberfly
post Jan 26 2009, 12:25 AM
Post #13


kthxbai
******

Group: Official Designer
Posts: 2,832
Joined: Feb 2008
Member No: 621,203



QUOTE(Gigi @ Jan 25 2009, 10:29 PM) *
God I don't know how to sound friendly online, LOL.

Ugh I know!

nevermind _smile.gif
 
Gigi
post Jan 26 2009, 01:02 AM
Post #14


in a matter of time
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 7,151
Joined: Aug 2005
Member No: 191,357



No, that previous lack of friendliness towards you was intentional, don't get your little head worried about that now.
 

Closed TopicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: