Log In · Register

 

Resource Center Links


This Month's Contests | Hosts Looking for Hostees | Hostees looking for Hosts | Big Book of Resources

Submission Guidelines

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
google made a change to their homepage
synapse
post Sep 9 2009, 08:19 PM
Post #1


Live long and prosper.
********

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 10,142
Joined: Apr 2007
Member No: 514,926



bout damn time they made some kind of change!

http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/09/now...-e-r-sized.html

Basically, they just made things a little easier to use, with making everything a tiny bit bigger.
 
Gigi
post Sep 9 2009, 09:18 PM
Post #2


in a matter of time
*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 7,151
Joined: Aug 2005
Member No: 191,357



It's hard to get excited over a larger search box, which isn't even truly "supersized".

yawn. I was never looking for Google to change (not that this is a bad change or anything), but if it ain't broke...
 
heyo-captain-jac...
post Sep 9 2009, 09:24 PM
Post #3


/人◕‿‿◕人\
*******

Group: Official Member
Posts: 8,283
Joined: Dec 2007
Member No: 602,927



I can't even see a difference.
 
HeartOfPandora
post Sep 16 2009, 01:30 PM
Post #4


i like boobies, yes I do. I like boobies - how 'bout you?
*****

Group: Member
Posts: 620
Joined: Jun 2008
Member No: 662,457



That's a really boring, kind of annoying change... now I have to zoom out to make it feel normal. :\
 
sixfive
post Sep 16 2009, 05:22 PM
Post #5



*******

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 7,019
Joined: May 2008
Member No: 653,768



I kept wondering if my browser had it zoomed in.
 
karmakiller
post Sep 16 2009, 07:39 PM
Post #6


DDR \\ I'm Dee :)
*******

Group: Mentor
Posts: 8,662
Joined: Mar 2006
Member No: 384,020



I hate the huge search box.
 
synapse
post Oct 8 2009, 09:51 PM
Post #7


Live long and prosper.
********

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 10,142
Joined: Apr 2007
Member No: 514,926



http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/10/07/googl...g-sexy-buttons/

they made another.. I didn't notice this one since firefox has always had these buttons.. at least I think it has.
 
fixtatik
post Oct 9 2009, 01:07 PM
Post #8


Senior Member
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,237
Joined: May 2008
Member No: 648,123



Meh...only sexy buttons for Webkit-based browsers.
 
Mikeplyts
post Oct 14 2009, 11:50 PM
Post #9


Mel Blanc was allergic to carrots.
*******

Group: Official Designer
Posts: 6,371
Joined: Aug 2008
Member No: 676,291



^wtf




The only, slightly interesting thing Google did (at least for me that is) was with that barcode logo. mellow.gif
 
synapse
post Oct 16 2009, 02:53 PM
Post #10


Live long and prosper.
********

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 10,142
Joined: Apr 2007
Member No: 514,926



QUOTE(Mikeplyts @ Oct 15 2009, 12:50 AM) *
^wtf
The only, slightly interesting thing Google did (at least for me that is) was with that barcode logo. mellow.gif

Web-Kit browsers are browsers that utilize web-kit to make them, err.. browsers like safari, and webkit(obv).
 
fixtatik
post Oct 16 2009, 02:59 PM
Post #11


Senior Member
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,237
Joined: May 2008
Member No: 648,123



^ I think they only did it for WebKit browsers because Google Chrome runs the WebKit rendering engine, and naturally they want everyone to switch to their browser to see the changes.
 
synapse
post Oct 16 2009, 10:29 PM
Post #12


Live long and prosper.
********

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 10,142
Joined: Apr 2007
Member No: 514,926



QUOTE(fixtatik @ Oct 16 2009, 03:59 PM) *
^ I think they only did it for WebKit browsers because Google Chrome runs the WebKit rendering engine, and naturally they want everyone to switch to their browser see the changes. to take over the world

That's probably true.
 
Mikeplyts
post Oct 16 2009, 11:20 PM
Post #13


Mel Blanc was allergic to carrots.
*******

Group: Official Designer
Posts: 6,371
Joined: Aug 2008
Member No: 676,291



no, I think I misphrased. I know what Webkit-based browsers are, I just said wtf that they had to make it for only Webkit-based browsers. :|
 
synapse
post Oct 16 2009, 11:23 PM
Post #14


Live long and prosper.
********

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 10,142
Joined: Apr 2007
Member No: 514,926



QUOTE(Mikeplyts @ Oct 17 2009, 12:20 AM) *
no, I think I misphrased. I know what Webkit-based browsers are, I just said wtf that they had to make it for only Webkit-based browsers. :|

cause firefox already had sexy buttons.
 
mipadi
post Oct 20 2009, 09:23 AM
Post #15


Senior Member
******

Group: Administrator
Posts: 2,648
Joined: Apr 2008
Member No: 639,265



QUOTE(fixtatik @ Oct 16 2009, 03:59 PM) *
^ I think they only did it for WebKit browsers because Google Chrome runs the WebKit rendering engine, and naturally they want everyone to switch to their browser to see the changes.


Or because only WebKit implements the gradient extension.

Also, Firefox has it in the latest alpha, but with a different method; I think Google wants to push for the standardization of the WebKit extension.
 
Mikeplyts
post Oct 21 2009, 06:19 AM
Post #16


Mel Blanc was allergic to carrots.
*******

Group: Official Designer
Posts: 6,371
Joined: Aug 2008
Member No: 676,291



Oh cool, I just downloaded a Web-kit browser. Do I get a cookie now?
 
medic
post Nov 23 2009, 01:57 AM
Post #17


Seoul Rocks!
*****

Group: Member
Posts: 936
Joined: Jun 2005
Member No: 155,811



It's Google, they could put a box with a red x to show their logo isn't loading, and they would still make billions. I like Google as a home page, it loads fast and doesn't have all the useless clutter like Yahoo or AOL.
 

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: