Log In · Register

 

Debate Rules

Here are the general forum rules that you must follow before you start any debate topics. Please make sure you've read and followed all directions.

Debate.

9 Pages V   1 2 3 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Global Warming, the real deal, or propaganda?
kimmytree
post Mar 29 2007, 03:43 PM
Post #1


Kimberly
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,961
Joined: Apr 2005
Member No: 121,599



With our nation's politics so split, it seems like just as many people that believe in Global Warming think its a lie. What are your views on it? Are we really damaging our Environment with our huge production of carbon dioxide? Or are scientists and enviromentalists simply exaggerating?

I was flipping through my Chemistry book today in class, and found a very interesting section on Global Warming. It's an A Beka Book, published by a Christian college... last updated in 2000. I completely disagree with what the book says, but I thought it'd be interesting to share and debate on. _smile.gif

Global Warming
Recently, some scientists have speculated that mankind's production of CO2 (from fossil fuel combustion, agriculture, and cement manufacturing) may significantly enhance the greenhouse effect, causing average global temperatures to rise. Although man's annual contribution of CO2ot the environment is far smaller than nature's (roughly 7 billion tons vs. 200 billion tons), these scientists worry that this small increase may cause unpredictable changes in the global climate. Environmental activists have gone much further, predicting global flooding, disease epidemics, mass famine, and even the extinction of the human race if drastic action is not taken to slash CO2 emissions.

Earth's climate history
Actually, mankind's effects on the global climate are probably far smaller than some would like to think. Although the earth's climate is not well understood, the science of climatology has shown that the earth's climate tends to fluctuate over long term cycles. For example, between AD 900 and AD 1100, a period climatologists call the Medieval Climate Optimum or Medieval Warm Period, global temperatures are thought to have been significantly warmer than at present. The weather was so mild that grapes and citrus fruits were grown in England; the Vikings established successful farms and colonies in Greenland; and the Anasazi Indians built a large agriculture-based civilization on the Colorado Plateau (which was then characterized by a warm, moist climate). By the 1300's, however, global temperatures dropped sharply, plunging the world into a period called the Little Ice Age. The Vikings' crops and livestock in Greenland began to fail, the colonists died, and the island became covered with ice. Widespread exhaustion and malnutrition due to poor weather and crop failures left Europe vulnerable to huge plague epidemics that killed millions of people. Cooler, drier weather on the Colorado Plateau spelled the end of the Anasazi civilization in America, while at the same time the Thames River near London froze over in the winter with ice thick enough to support annual "ice fairs." In the years to come, the unusually cold winters would cause great hardship for early American colonists. About 1850, the climate began to warm once again, gradually ending the Little Ice Age; by the early 20th century, citrus fruits were being grown in the United States as far north as the Carolinas. This warming continued until 1938 or so, when temperatures leveled off and began to drop once again (probably related to ta decline in solar output). As late as the 1970's, unusually cold winters prompted environmental activists to call for drastic government action to save the planet from "global cooling" and an imminent Ice Age. In the late 1980'sand 1990's, temperatures once again began to climb (corresponding to an increase in solar output), prompting renewed calls to save the planet - this time for global warming.

The Kyoto Protocol
The United Nations responded to fears of global warming by convening a 1992 "Earth Summit" in Rio de Janiero, Brazil. Under the direction of radical environmentalist Maurice Strong, leaders of 150 nations drafted the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, which called for nations to "voluntarily" clash CO2 emissions, at great cost, to 1990 levels. In 1995, at a second UN conference in Berlin, developing nations voted to exempt themselves from any restrictions while approving mandatory CO2 cutbacks for developed nations such as the United States. These mandatory cutbacks were later incorporated into an amendment to the Freamework Convention called the Kyoto Protocol, drafted in Kyoto, Japan, in December 1998.

The Kyoto Protocol demands that the United States reduce its CO2 emissions to 7% below 1990 levels by the year 2010 (a 30-40% reduction below estimated 2010 levels). It also calls for restrictions on hydrofluorocarbons and perfluorocarbons, methane, nitrous oxide, and sulfur hexafluoride.

Interestingly, most other nations fare far better under the treaty than the United States. China, Singapore, Mexico, and many other rapidly industrializing nations are specifically exempted from the Protocol, while the nations of Western Europe are allowed to count the shutdown of pullution-emitting Communist factories in Eastern Europe in the early 1990's as if they were cutbacks in their own CO2 production.

Costs of Kyoto
Proponents of the Kyoto Protocol have argued that slashing CO2 emissions by as much as 40% below estimated 2010 levels will have little if any economic cost. The Clinton Administration estimated that the only noticeable effect would be an increase in gasoline prices of 6-8 cents per gallon, while some environmentalists have even argued that the treaty will save money and jobs. However, since the treaty lays heavy burdens on U.S. industries while copletely exempting most overseas industries, it is likely that it will only accelerate the flight of energy-intensive U.S. industries to other nations, with the inevitable loss of American jobs. Some critics predict that by 2010, the Kyoto Protocol could result in the loss of 2.4 million U.S. jobs and cost the average family as much as $2700 per year in price increases and losti ncome. Energy shortages like those of the 1970s may once again become commonplace, particularly if environmentalists continue to obstruct the construction of new nuclear plants.

Possible benefits of rising CO2
These huge costs are particularly ironic in the light of the fact that increased CO2 levels (and even global warming, should it occur) would likely be a net benefit to mankind. It is a known fact that plants grow much more efficiently at higher CO2 concentrations; if the CO2 content of the air is experimentally doubled, crop yields increase up to 50% while requiring much less water and fertilizer. In addition, history reveals that periods of warmer average global temperatures tend to be associated with better living conditions for humanity as a whole. During the medieval Climate Optimum (when average global temperatures were 6-9 degrees warmer than at present), average life expectancies increased significantly due to reduced disease, higher crop yields, and better nutrition. The global cooling that ended this period (the Little Ice Age), by contrast, was associated with a 10-year drop in average life expectancies.

Looking ahead
Unfortunately, the Kyoto Protocol seems to reflect a "ready-fire-aim" approach that characterizes many environmental issues. Although the fate of the treaty is not yet certain, it is likely that the global warming debated will continue for some time to come. As Christians, however, we can be certain that "while the earth remaineth, seedtime and harvest, and cold and heat, and sumer and winter, and day and night shall not cease" (Genesis 8:22). Although we should do all within our power to protect the world God has given us, we must always remember that the fate of the earth rests in the hands of its Creator.

That last paragraph scares me the most... the idea that the earth will only cease to exist when God's ready for it to. The first few paragraphs just lead up to global warming... most of the bizzare content is in the last two paragraphs.

Agree, or disagree on the book's claims? Discuss. thumbsup.gif
 
tokyo-rose
post Mar 29 2007, 03:49 PM
Post #2


♡♡♡♡♡
********

Group: Head Staff
Posts: 18,173
Joined: Mar 2005
Member No: 108,478



I definitely believe that global warming exists. People who think it doesn't have probably been somewhat brainwashed (for lack of a better word). I've read that there's been evidence of global warming ever since factories started growing in great numbers during the Industrial Revolution, and temperatures nowadays are significantly warmer than they're supposed to be. They have been for the past several years. Global warming is not a lie.
 
Simba
post Mar 29 2007, 03:53 PM
Post #3


Photoartist
********

Group: Staff Alumni
Posts: 12,363
Joined: Apr 2006
Member No: 399,390



Well, yeah, the temperature change is evident and is as good as fact. I guess the only problem though is how much we did to contribute to the temperature changes and whether or not we can do anything about it.
 
kimmytree
post Mar 29 2007, 03:56 PM
Post #4


Kimberly
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,961
Joined: Apr 2005
Member No: 121,599



Yeah, I think global warming is the real deal. But even if scientists are totally wrong, the pollution still has to be damaging something. There's no way its good for the environment. We've only been producing carbon dioxide and other pollutants for a hundred years or so... so I dont think that's enough time for someone to say that its not hurting anything.

Wow, I cant believe a topic hasnt been made on this until now. ohmy.gif
 
itsnever4ever
post Mar 31 2007, 12:34 AM
Post #5


Senior Member
****

Group: Member
Posts: 108
Joined: Apr 2005
Member No: 127,064



I believe that global warming is a HUGE problem today, and if we do not fix it soon, it will reach the point of no return.
 
Kontroll
post Mar 31 2007, 10:42 AM
Post #6


Jake - The Unholy Trinity / Premiscuous Poeteer.
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,272
Joined: May 2006
Member No: 411,316



Global warming isn't going to happen. The average temperature over the past 100 years has only changed only about 1 1/2 to 2 degrees.

Like you said... Nature has a bigger affect on the environment than humans do.
 
kimmytree
post Mar 31 2007, 11:44 AM
Post #7


Kimberly
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,961
Joined: Apr 2005
Member No: 121,599



^ Well, I dont know if the temperature you say is accurate... but if it is, two degrees is a big deal. Enviromentalists arent saying it's going to be an immediate thing - it'll be gradual. You and I wont be effected by it, but our children and grandchildren will. We're creating more pollution now than we were fifty or a hundred years ago, so we really dont know the full effects yet, or how much we're actually changing temperatures.

Even if it really is two degrees every hundred years, and we create the same amount of pollution we are now or have in the past, after five hundred years thats TEN DEGREES. That's major. That would cause the ice caps to melt even more than they are now, and raise our water levels. Freaking Orlando would be like Tampa is now. And that's just water. What about Hurricanes? The warmer the water, the more intense they are. And what about animals living in places like Anartica, Alaska, and other frigid places? It wont be cold enough for them to survive.

Even if you decide not to believe anything I just said, which is what many scientists believe, pollution still has to have some type of negative effect. I dont think anyone can deny that.

We have the technology to slow it down, so why not? How hard is it for someone to drive even just a more fuel efficient vehicle? And with everything going on with the Middle East, relying on more nuclear power instead of oil would be a win-win situation. No more having to depend on other countries, who hate us to begin with, for oil. What if they decided to cut us off all of a sudden? Our nation would completely shut down. But with nuclear power, we wouldnt really have to worry about it. Sure, we'd still need some oil, but we'd be able to eliminate alot of it. And, nuclear power plants dont pollute. _smile.gif
 
sweetangel2128
post Mar 31 2007, 02:48 PM
Post #8


Senior Member
*****

Group: Member
Posts: 728
Joined: Jan 2007
Member No: 495,803



Global warming is a possibility, heck anything is possible. Global warming may not happen in the next few years or even when me or you are still alive, it could be thousands of years from now if the Earth is still here.
 
kimmytree
post Mar 31 2007, 05:08 PM
Post #9


Kimberly
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,961
Joined: Apr 2005
Member No: 121,599



^ Yes. But, global warming is the slow process of it happening. So in a sense, its happening right now.
 
Joss-eh-lime
post Mar 31 2007, 11:36 PM
Post #10


tell me more.
******

Group: Official Member
Posts: 2,798
Joined: Jul 2004
Member No: 35,640



QUOTE
Although the earth's climate is not well understood, the science of climatology has shown that the earth's climate tends to fluctuate over long term cycles. For example, between AD 900 and AD 1100, a period climatologists call the Medieval Climate Optimum or Medieval Warm Period, global temperatures are thought to have been significantly warmer than at present.


thats pretty interesting...
i still think global warming is real, and its affecting us
a couple of days ago i had to bring my umbrella and today i wore a tank top & flip flops...its crazy.

& beside that point we are using up earths resources really fast, and i hear in 50 or so years there will be no more oil?! yeah..maybe the earth IS comgin to an end.
 
sweetangel2128
post Apr 1 2007, 01:22 AM
Post #11


Senior Member
*****

Group: Member
Posts: 728
Joined: Jan 2007
Member No: 495,803



QUOTE(kimmytree @ Mar 31 2007, 3:08 PM) *
^ Yes. But, global warming is the slow process of it happening. So in a sense, its happening right now.


Yes, I know, I am just saying that it could be thousands of years before it actually happens since it's such a slow process.
 
kimmytree
post Apr 1 2007, 09:16 AM
Post #12


Kimberly
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,961
Joined: Apr 2005
Member No: 121,599



Yeah, that's definately a possibility. But if we already know that the earth's temperature has gone up two degrees over the past hundred years... why wouldnt it be sooner? A thousand years from now at the same rate would be 20 degrees.
 
sweetangel2128
post Apr 1 2007, 03:28 PM
Post #13


Senior Member
*****

Group: Member
Posts: 728
Joined: Jan 2007
Member No: 495,803



QUOTE(kimmytree @ Apr 1 2007, 7:16 AM) *
Yeah, that's definately a possibility. But if we already know that the earth's temperature has gone up two degrees over the past hundred years... why wouldnt it be sooner? A thousand years from now at the same rate would be 20 degrees.


Your right, it could happen sooner, we don't know that for sure. For all we know it might not ever happen. laugh.gif
 
Amaranthus
post Apr 22 2007, 06:01 PM
Post #14


Fellatio.
******

Group: Official Member
Posts: 2,122
Joined: Mar 2007
Member No: 511,775



a little bit of both I believe
 
kimmytree
post Apr 22 2007, 06:40 PM
Post #15


Kimberly
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,961
Joined: Apr 2005
Member No: 121,599



QUOTE(Seraphim9 @ Apr 22 2007, 7:01 PM) *
a little bit of both I believe

Why so? Do you feel like Environmentalists, like Al Gore, are exaggerating?
 
Mystic Eyes
post Apr 23 2007, 04:44 PM
Post #16


The kooks
*****

Group: Member
Posts: 499
Joined: Apr 2007
Member No: 516,563



Global warming is for real whether you like it or not. I mean seriously when you see smoke and smog coming out of factories and roof tops do you think it looks healthy for the environment. It was soo obvious to me that it was messing up the environment.

What's soo pathetic is that only now since some scientists are putting pressure on governments and proving to them that global warming is a real threat has people in general and governments actually taken notice. Before no one cared but now they do cuz they all want to save there own skin.

Also there's this attitude still about in people which is "I don't care since it won't effect me".
 
kimmytree
post Apr 23 2007, 04:48 PM
Post #17


Kimberly
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,961
Joined: Apr 2005
Member No: 121,599



QUOTE(Mystic Eyes @ Apr 23 2007, 5:44 PM) *

Also there's this attitude still about in people which is "I don't care since it won't effect me".

I hate it when people think like that. Especially people who are educated enough to know better. They just dont want anything to be an incovenience to them. Even if the effects of global warming will never affect them personally, its going to affect their children and grandchildren. Is that not enough to make them care? How selfish. Thats why we really need a Democrat to win in 08. With them having control of both the White House and the Senate / Congress, everything that needs to be passed concerning global warming will be. Thank God.
 
Mystic Eyes
post Apr 23 2007, 05:05 PM
Post #18


The kooks
*****

Group: Member
Posts: 499
Joined: Apr 2007
Member No: 516,563



I know how you feel kimmytree. But the truth is, that people mostly have a stupid attitude like "Rather you than me".

Soo when you measure it all up, the world is doomed. Why? Because there will always be those who don't care and if they do then it's only to save themselves. Lets not forget that this won't only effect us but the whole animal kingdom but people don't care of course.

The answer = cutting people's genitals off until they do something.

Yes, black mail is a beautiful thing devil.gif
 
kimmytree
post Apr 23 2007, 05:35 PM
Post #19


Kimberly
******

Group: Member
Posts: 1,961
Joined: Apr 2005
Member No: 121,599



^ Lmao, I dont know about cutting them off. But yeah, you're right. But jeez, so many people dont "get" what's really going on. It's just so frustrating. :/
 
viugiufgjhfhjfhg...
post Apr 23 2007, 06:12 PM
Post #20


The one man Voltron
*****

Group: Member
Posts: 711
Joined: Dec 2006
Member No: 491,519



QUOTE(Mystic Eyes @ Apr 24 2007, 12:05 AM) *
I know how you feel kimmytree. But the truth is, that people mostly have a stupid attitude like "Rather you than me".

Soo when you measure it all up, the world is doomed. Why? Because there will always be those who don't care and if they do then it's only to save themselves. Lets not forget that this won't only effect us but the whole animal kingdom but people don't care of course.

The answer = cutting people's genitals off until they do something.

Yes, black mail is a beautiful thing devil.gif


God bless the eunuchs, for they shall inherit the Earth.
 
Laughsalot
post Apr 24 2007, 10:36 AM
Post #21


look for the stars as the sun goes down
*****

Group: Member
Posts: 493
Joined: Aug 2006
Member No: 453,963



i remember watching something on national geographic that like global warming had something to do with the whole current of the ocean. i can't remember what it's called.but it connects the whole ocean together.
 
moorepocket
post Apr 24 2007, 02:28 PM
Post #22


Death is a promise given to us at birth
*******

Group: Official Designer
Posts: 4,757
Joined: Mar 2004
Member No: 7,459



i didn't thought of it, until my friend told me about it. The glaciers are already melting
 
Mystic Eyes
post Apr 24 2007, 05:25 PM
Post #23


The kooks
*****

Group: Member
Posts: 499
Joined: Apr 2007
Member No: 516,563



QUOTE(kimmytree @ Apr 23 2007, 11:35 PM) *
^ Lmao, I dont know about cutting them off. But yeah, you're right. But jeez, so many people dont "get" what's really going on. It's just so frustrating. :/


Yeah, it's sad but what can you do. Humans are selfish creatures.

Hmm, how about we go on a crusade to save this planet. And if that by some miracle fails then there's always plan D (Death) devil.gif
 
NYCin2009
post Jun 2 2007, 11:13 PM
Post #24


Senior Member
****

Group: Member
Posts: 105
Joined: Jun 2007
Member No: 530,627



Oh, global warming is real alright.

Most people who refuse to accept the fact that is happening are usually the ones who just don't want to have to think about doing anything to stop it.
 
ashleybby
post Jun 7 2007, 01:54 AM
Post #25


Senior Member
****

Group: Member
Posts: 126
Joined: Feb 2007
Member No: 501,647



i am not sure if it is real or not. i do believe that all the pollution and smog is affecting the world tho.

but someone pointed it out that the world goes through times when it heats up then cools down
like there was the ice age, and then it melted...
ah i dont know. i havent done any research or anything
but i just thought i would point it out that warming and cooling has been happening for a loooong time.
just a thought. haha idk.

but i am against all this smog. in vegas, its really gross because you can see it in the air.
"/
 

9 Pages V   1 2 3 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: