Printable Version of Topic

Posted by: jcp Oct 11 2009, 12:19 AM

what would you do if our next president was a woman? I would probably move out of America.

Posted by: brooklyneast05 Oct 11 2009, 12:20 AM

i would be glad.

Posted by: IWontRapeYou Oct 11 2009, 12:40 AM

Shitty topic even for you JCP

Posted by: austinseals Oct 11 2009, 01:07 AM

We gave a black man a shot.

Broke the ice a bit.
I wouldn't doubt Hilary eventually being president.



If Sarah Palin ever became president ...
Oh
My
God.

Posted by: moirakas Oct 11 2009, 02:40 AM

C'mon Penny. Diggin' that hole just a little bit deeper every time you say something f*cking stupid.

Posted by: jcp Oct 11 2009, 01:29 PM

my opinion.
living in texas I havent met anyone that doesnt hate Obama. I dont have a problem with him.

Posted by: brooklyneast05 Oct 11 2009, 01:52 PM

^ what's that have to do with anything

Posted by: jcp Oct 11 2009, 02:27 PM

a lot.

and sup.

and even this bear thinks that is ridiculous.

Posted by: Tomates Oct 11 2009, 02:37 PM

Whats wrong with having the idea of a women president?

Posted by: karmakiller Oct 11 2009, 02:58 PM

Uhh, this isn't even a debate. It's just asking what we would do. In history, a lot of male presidents have made stupid decisions, so it's not like they have proven men are better for the job. The worse that could happen is that she'd PMS and drop bombs on another country.

Posted by: jcp Oct 11 2009, 03:13 PM

I dont know. I mean. ya... idk.

is that a good answer? that is the only reason many people will have.

Posted by: IWontRapeYou Oct 11 2009, 03:15 PM

wat

Posted by: Tomates Oct 11 2009, 03:16 PM

that answer made no sense.

Posted by: kryogenix Oct 11 2009, 07:39 PM

It's the oval office, not the oval kitchen.

Posted by: IWontRapeYou Oct 11 2009, 07:40 PM

After the woman president gets through with it it will be. It will also have several different laundry rooms.

Posted by: HeartOfPandora Oct 11 2009, 07:52 PM

/lalala, imaginary deletes this reply.

Posted by: brooklyneast05 Oct 11 2009, 07:58 PM

have you been smoking some bananas joseph, you're replies are so confusing and incoherent. like this one

Posted by: austinseals Oct 12 2009, 03:23 AM

Agreed.

Posted by: Buttsex Oct 12 2009, 03:24 AM

As long as our president makes me a sammich I'm fine with it.

Posted by: doughnut Oct 12 2009, 04:03 AM

are you still wondering why people do not take you seriously?

Posted by: jcp Oct 12 2009, 12:32 PM

maybe...


people dont take me seriously?



why is that?



one post like this and it turns into a hate thread.

Posted by: hypnotique Oct 12 2009, 12:50 PM

no you wouldn't you would fap to the 1000's of photoshopped images of said woman president's head on naked/bikini bodies.

Posted by: brooklyneast05 Oct 12 2009, 01:02 PM

because there isn't any reason why i wouldn't. why would having a woman president be inherently worse than having a man president? we already know that men can be shitty presidents, so there isn't anything to indicate that there is some uniquely male characteristic that prevents them from being bad.

it's just a stupid thing to say. saying that a woman will be a bad president becuase she is a woman is the same thing as saying a black/asian/hipsanic/JEW/whatever person will be no good because they were born black/asian/hipsanic/JEW/whatever. it's not a justifiable reason.

Posted by: emberfly Oct 12 2009, 02:00 PM

and lol @ oval kitchen.

Posted by: jcp Oct 12 2009, 02:48 PM

I would love a jewish president.

but theres the thing. jews would like that, maybe not others.
some like a black president, some dont.
some would like a lady. some wouldnt. but no one has a problem with the born american caucasian. the choices they make though are very controversial. so it seems like a male white man is the most un, ummm.... the most nuetral kind of man. my opinion.
and we have had 44 white male presidents. why break the chain?

idk... sometimes i think about the good having a black president has done other times not...

silly dog, what are you doing up there. you arent a power line technician. you dont even have tools.

Posted by: IWontRapeYou Oct 12 2009, 02:55 PM

Do you really think saying "my opinion" makes what you just said any less stupid? Basically what you just said is "We should let white men rule everything because they make all the sexist and raciest happy"

Posted by: jcp Oct 12 2009, 04:23 PM

it makes my opinion stupid.

haters.

Posted by: brooklyneast05 Oct 12 2009, 04:25 PM

agree with abbey and to add onto what abbey said keeping only white male presidents for the sake of "not breaking the chain" is just as trivial and stupid a reason as anything. apply that logic anywhere else and it makes no sense. how about we just don't give blacks and women rights because why break the chain? how about we keep discriminating against jews because i mean we've been doing it for a while so why stop now?



oh yeah and idk how white men make everyone happy. if you actually think about it white men are the minority. all the women + all minority races together we outweigh them by a lot. they've made a lot of good choices for the rest of us in history...not.

Posted by: emberfly Oct 12 2009, 08:50 PM

some have. some haven't. same can be said about every other race.


I don't care who is president as long as they can do their job and do it well.

Posted by: kryogenix Oct 13 2009, 02:21 AM

It's called the oval office, not oval oven.

Posted by: jcp Oct 13 2009, 10:20 AM

hahahahhahahahahahhaakhaahhhaa.

o gawd.

Posted by: hypnotique Oct 15 2009, 11:38 AM

Whats the difference though?
Theres been plenty of incompetent white leaders in office but you hear no one say "Sometimes I think about the good about having a white president has done and other times not"

Posted by: dosomethin888 Oct 15 2009, 09:16 PM

When people disagree with a black president, they're racist.
When people disagree with a white president, they're unpatriotic.
Now, if people were to disagree with a woman president, they're sexist.

Posted by: jcp Oct 15 2009, 09:24 PM

are you being sarcastic.

I think the fact that people call other people racist when they dis agree with obama is stupid. someone is racist if they openly admit they dislike black people.

Posted by: dosomethin888 Oct 15 2009, 09:28 PM

Yes, I was being sarcastic.

Posted by: karmakiller Oct 15 2009, 09:52 PM

Uhhhh lol do even know what racism is?

Posted by: jcp Oct 15 2009, 09:56 PM

my last neighbor was black. and my other neighbor. was racist. yes. i do.

Posted by: Buttsex Oct 15 2009, 09:58 PM

joseph u dum

Posted by: karmakiller Oct 15 2009, 10:00 PM

You do know it affects more than just black people and you don't have to openly admit that you're racist to be a racist person, right? Maybe you think you understand it, but your responses here prove otherwise.

Posted by: jcp Oct 15 2009, 10:27 PM

...
look i think i know what racism is.
your just trying to make me look stoopid.

Posted by: dosomethin888 Oct 15 2009, 10:32 PM

Everyone knows what racism is. Stop trying to act smart with all your fancy talk.

Posted by: IWontRapeYou Oct 15 2009, 10:48 PM

She's not the one that made you look stupid. That was all you buddy.

Posted by: jcp Oct 15 2009, 10:56 PM

if you made it through jr high or you live in america you know what it is.

Posted by: IWontRapeYou Oct 15 2009, 10:59 PM

oh ok. Then as long as I secretly hate African/Mexican/Chinese/ect. people I'm not racist? That's nice to know.

That's what Dee what getting at.

Posted by: karmakiller Oct 15 2009, 11:55 PM

lol@"fancy talk". Abbey pretty much summed it up, but the reason I pointed out what Joseph said is because of the way he said it. Just because you haven't seen racism or experienced it doesn't mean that it doesn't exist. Someone doesn't have to join a hate group or publicly affirm that they are racist to actually be racist, because there is such a thing as "thought".

Joseph, I'm not calling anyone stupid, I just pointed out how I took your reply and since you are in the Debate forum you might want to be more thorough with your thoughts before you reply.

Oook, moving on...

Posted by: dosomethin888 Oct 16 2009, 12:15 AM

Everyone knows what racism is, that it does exist, that some people are racist and those people who are aren't going to announce it to anyone or they don't know they are in the first place. Duh. I don't know what kind of point you are trying to make... Other than maybe you have a problem with how people explain things. Everyone here knows what racism is... You basically are starting a little debate for no reason.. maybe your bored? Anyways, we were talking about the people (or Jimmy Carter) calling people racist when they disagree with Obama, we weren't talking about racism as a whole.

Posted by: dosomethin888 Oct 16 2009, 03:12 PM

This is a topic about a woman president, not racism. She was the one who got all technical about it and started a little debate.

Posted by: karmakiller Oct 16 2009, 05:18 PM

There you go. The reason I said something was all because I knew Joseph was getting at something, but what he said didn't convey what he meant. Just because this is the Debate forum doesn't mean every reply is trying to start something. I was just clearing things up. There's nothing technical about appropriately using a word.

Posted by: dosomethin888 Oct 16 2009, 09:15 PM

Oh ok.

Posted by: SoleShine Jun 16 2010, 11:50 AM

it wouldnt be worse than what we have now.

Posted by: mipadi Jun 16 2010, 12:04 PM

I know, right? Obama is, like, the worst president ever. Four more years of Bush/Cheney! Palin 2012!

Posted by: SoleShine Jun 16 2010, 12:07 PM

i never thought i would know someone else who likes palin, too! i think she is great! better than obama. this heathcare stuff is scary. i just want it gone. america is stupid for voting him in. he wont make it past this term. we cant vote him in a second time!

Posted by: brooklyneast05 Jun 16 2010, 12:17 PM

lol...

Posted by: mipadi Jun 16 2010, 01:12 PM

Fully agree. Our health care system is currently set up as the perfect form of economic darwinism. Only productive, affluent members of the free market deserve to be healthy.

Posted by: ArjunaCapulong Jun 16 2010, 01:19 PM

Posted by: spambot Jun 16 2010, 02:25 PM

Posted by: SoleShine Jun 16 2010, 09:45 PM

well not quite....



amen. this case has been rested.

Posted by: Tomates Jun 16 2010, 11:18 PM

Posted by: aflyingcumshot Jun 17 2010, 01:37 AM

8/10 troll attempt, wouldve given you a 9 or 10 if you stated some actual facts

Posted by: SoleShine Jun 17 2010, 09:22 AM

uh...thank you?

Posted by: aflyingcumshot Jun 17 2010, 08:18 PM

oh you werent trolling? damn, guess your just a f*cking idiot then

Posted by: ButtsexV2 Jun 17 2010, 09:39 PM

On an unrelated note, I'd like to see someone like McCain in office. My only issue with him is on a personal issue, where he said that he thinks Christians are most fit to lead the country.

Posted by: SoleShine Jun 17 2010, 10:28 PM

what makes me an idiot, the fact that im a republican or the fact that i wasnt trolling?

Posted by: aflyingcumshot Jun 17 2010, 11:58 PM

no, its other stuff

Posted by: ButtsexV2 Jun 18 2010, 12:37 AM

I'm a republican too, don't worry.

but I don't support Palin, I mean wtf is that shit

Posted by: tokyo-rose Jun 18 2010, 01:41 AM

Didn't a lot of McCain supporters not vote for him because they were concerned that Palin would take over if he up and died?

Posted by: ButtsexV2 Jun 18 2010, 01:48 AM

Yeah. McCain would have probably won if Palin didn't end up running with him.

Posted by: aflyingcumshot Jun 18 2010, 01:52 AM

^nah, but it would've been much closer and yeah, mccain is gonna croak soon, no offense

Posted by: SoleShine Jun 18 2010, 08:23 AM

yeah, but then again, alot of people voted for him BECAUSE of her

Posted by: serotonin Jun 18 2010, 08:26 AM

Posted by: SoleShine Jun 18 2010, 08:28 AM

^ thaaaaaank you.

Posted by: serotonin Jun 18 2010, 08:42 AM

In short, you're an idiot who's annoying people by spamming useless posts. Go away.

Posted by: brooklyneast05 Jun 18 2010, 12:16 PM

obviously not enough


the majority are the people who are in the middle. people in the middle didn't vote for him because of her, because she's too extreme for people in the middle (unlike mccain, who's biggest strength imo was the perception he isn't far right). he shot himself in the foot by adding her on, seriously. i have no clue why she would increase the appeal for anyone. that includes women, who should be completely offended that he chose her out of all the intelligent women he could have chosen. i just really question anyone's sanity who thinks palin is the sharpest tool in the shed and most qualified woman out there.

out of all the great reasons to vote for mccain, i can't fathom why anyone's main reason would be because of palin. what the hell kind of person thinks palin has more merit to her name than mccain? wtf

Posted by: mipadi Jun 18 2010, 12:46 PM

Luckily for those voters, Obama can be described as "isn't far right" as well.

Posted by: aflyingcumshot Jun 18 2010, 06:11 PM

i got no problem with people liking palin, just gotta provide some adequate reasons, but there aren't any so therefore no one can like palin

Posted by: Tomates Jun 18 2010, 09:34 PM

I don't think she's just the reason why people voted for McCain.

Posted by: ButtsexV2 Jun 18 2010, 09:43 PM

He's only in his early 70's, he's probably got at least another two years before senility kicks in.

Posted by: tokyo-rose Jun 18 2010, 10:17 PM

I think Kevin was referring to his POW injuries? A lot of voters voiced their concern about that when the 2008 campaigns were still going on.

Posted by: aflyingcumshot Jun 18 2010, 10:22 PM

more concerned about the heart attack he had in june 08

Posted by: ButtsexV2 Jun 18 2010, 10:28 PM

That's right, I forgot about that. Either way, I still give him a few more years before he's totally unfit to lead, whether do to senility, injury, death, or anything else.

Posted by: aflyingcumshot Jun 18 2010, 10:31 PM

still too big a risk, hell, even if the P90X guy was running with palin behind him, id be scared

Posted by: batman Jun 21 2010, 01:52 PM

women can't make decisions.