male pregnancy, immoral? Options

[*Kathleen*]

hmm the men are against it and the women are for it... (sry to state the obvious)

I'm against it.

[*[2]Nekked*]

uHH???

dont spam

[KrunkMuzik]

Wow, that's crazy. I think science takes things TOO far. They mess with things that aren't supposed to be messed with. Some things are just better off beingg left alone.

[xHalf nHalf]

yeah i definately think thats sick and im totally against it....blah

[krazyxp]

if the male wants to share the pain, i say he GO FOR IT!
the whole male/female equality is coming around in interesting ways. ^^*
i hope to see the day when the guys at work are taking pregnancy breaks..

[inlonelinessidie]

Don't mean to sound apolcalyptic, but when men start having babies, I know that the end is around the corner.

ROFL

I see the end near too.

Personally, I don't like the idea. I don't think it's healthy especially for the fetus. God (sorry to bring God in this for all the haters, but I must) made women so we can bare children. It's just not right for a man to bare a child. He doesn't have enough female hormones as we do nor does he have a womb for the child to develop in or a vagina for delivery. I think it's just . . . very odd.

[DrEaMgUy2K1]

the thought of it gives me the willies lol

[emptyminded]

I think that we should just leave women to bear children. It is true that we go through a lot more than men but that just isn't worth it. How are we going to "make" babies if both sexes carry them? I don't know. I don't think this world is ready for Male Pregnancy.

[LaRevolucion]

Hmm...I'm against it. It just doesn't seem right and plus the pregnancy should be left to us women. We're specially made for carrying a baby and nurturing it.

[inlonelinessidie]

Hmm...I'm against it. It just doesn't seem right and plus the pregnancy should be left to us women. We're specially made for carrying a baby and nurturing it.

Yup. Jeez science is getting weirder everyday. Instead of finding cures for cancer and aids we waste the money on pointless crap.

[*Kathleen*]

If this were to actually happen, the baby would probably come out deformed or something...honestly, how would he breast feed the baby? Hmm? Poor kid.

[*[2]Nekked*]

If this were to actually happen, the baby would probably come out deformed or something...honestly, how would he breast feed the baby? Hmm? Poor kid.

there are formulas for that, or wetnurses. how do you think fathers feed their kids when the mothers run out on them?

[inn0centmarianne]

oh my this is so interesting, yeah.. technology these days, well I think it seems a little strange but I`m not critisizing anything, I think it sounds quite fine ;/

[CrimsonArchangel]

I'm against it.

Me too.

Instead of wasting money on trying to get men pregnant, why not try to fix the ozone layer or cure cancer or something. *sigh* what has this world come to.
Women and women alone were designed to carry babies and nurture them. Science shouldn't be playing with nature's design like that. Its wrong.

[Spirited Away]

We can rule out the social argument of:"it's not right for men to bear children because it's not their 'role' to do so". The traditional roles do not mean much to many people anymore. Sure, many men still believe in chilvalry and being the bread winner, but that logic cannot be applied to the majority of the developed world.

So, I find that the only angle of attack to the IMORALITY of male pregnancy is from the physical imperatives... for now.

Physically, the male species do not have the anatomies to nurture a growing fetus and a baby. Physically, it goes against nature. Physically, it goes against the process of mating/intercourse to have a pregnancy, which brings us back to a full circle of it being unnatural.

I understand that there are a variety of options to care for a growing child, but this is where the physical limitations of the male show their pathetic faces. There can be no arguement that women have the assets to bear children and to feed them naturally. Having thus such physical assets, women are in tune and perhaps will have a more emotional attachment to the child growing in their wombs because their bodies make them inclined to have strong maternal feelings. Of course, there is NO scientific evidence to back my assumption, but I trust that mothers will swear to it. Why would we have breasts, if not to feed our children? Why would we have vaginas if not to give birth to them? Is it not unnatural to have breasts and vaginas and not use them for what they are meant to do?

There are too many ways to refute this argument so far but I'm going to stop here and see what the responses are... I'll continue from there. This is an iffy subject and I don't really have solid stance on it.

[*[2]Nekked*]

How does the fetus obtain nutrients from Mr. Lee's body?

The umbilical cord and placenta are implanted into Mr. Lee's body. The metabolic exchanges between the fetus and patient, between mucosal with chorionic tissues, are almost analagous to female pregnancies.

takin from the sites FAQ

[Spirited Away]

^ That needs to be done through scientific interference and not something naturally provided/born with, which still means the male body has natural physical limitation in pregnancy.

[inlonelinessidie]

^ That needs to be done through scientific interference and not something naturally provided/born with, which still means the male body has natural physical limitation in pregnancy.

exactly. why would/should we waste money on something that is extremely pointless. not only is it absurd and unnatural,(i'll say it again) POINTLESS.

[*Kathleen*]

there are formulas for that, or wetnurses. how do you think fathers feed their kids when the mothers run out on them?

That doesn't mean that that's the best thing to use for children.

[mouse_3k]

it is a bit weird and not the natural way to go

[angel-roh]

i think God will make males get on pregnancy if the gay marriages get legal... i have that feeling cause God wants to have more ppls to our earth i guess...

[Mini]

Wow, I support homosexuality and gay marriages, but I'm sorry this is too much. I'm against it also. Hey, if Aliens come and wipe out our race by destroying the females, then I'm in for male pregnancy, but since that hasn't happened, then I'm against male pregnancy. I'm also iffy on this subject, but God made the world perfectly fine or if there isn't a God then we evolved the way we did. If men need to get pregnant, we would have evolved that way like the sea horses. That's so cool how the male sea horses carry the fertilized eggs and are impregnate with them.

There is no such thing as morally right or morally wrong. People were raised up with different ethics.

[is2diexd]

the only reason god decided to make womans have babies is because he didn't want to have babies -0-.. and that adam and eve this is an excuse for it -_-!!!

[sikdragon]

God is a spirit.

[sporadic]

And now we're onto the topic of God?

Okay, God gave man free will. Free will means he wants us to evolve on our own. Which means that if men want to have babies, and technology's evolved enough, men can have babies.