rnicron
Sep 9 2009, 03:24 PM
how can you put a video camera on the new nanos, but not on the touch? i mean, you can't even directly upload from the nano.
MAKES NO SENSE AT ALL!
discuss
dilligrout
Sep 9 2009, 03:26 PM
I have a jank sansa :|
creole
Sep 9 2009, 04:02 PM
lmfao just wait until there's a way to magically "jailbreak"
tbh the new ipod touch is just the same model, just lower prices, more memory, and the update isn't that much of a difference to make you go WOW.
synapse
Sep 9 2009, 06:38 PM
just buy an iphone. They're cheaper. lol 99 > 199. I bet camera's are coming, just not today. Probably have a few bugs they need to iron out. Like the ability to directly upload.
brooklyneast05
Sep 9 2009, 06:48 PM
QUOTE(tcunningham @ Sep 9 2009, 06:38 PM)
just buy an iphone. They're cheaper. lol 99 > 199. I bet camera's are coming, just not today. Probably have a few bugs they need to iron out. Like the ability to directly upload.
yeah but wouldn't it only take a month or two of paying a phone bill to make the touch cheaper
synapse
Sep 9 2009, 06:49 PM
for me, if i were to replace my blackberry, it'd be about the same. but for people with no phone bill, or even the ones with a $50 phone bill, they'd be spending more in the long run of course.
Gigi
Sep 9 2009, 09:15 PM
Wait for the iPod Touch to get a camera, then buy that. The prices for a data plan on the iPhone here...RIDICULOUS. And if I don't get a data plan with the iPhone, then what's the point? I spend most of my time at school and at home where I have access to Wi-Fi, and I lived without 3G for most of my life...I'm not giving in to Rogers Canada's insane monopoly. Canadians are shit businesspeople.
Back on topic though, when I heard my friend say the iPod nano was getting a camera today, I just said: "Why?!?!?" I know nano sales are down but this is really not the way to save it.
synapse
Sep 9 2009, 09:18 PM
Not to mention them trying to bring flair to the shuffle. When I was following gdgt's live blog, I was like... why with the shuffle. The classic doesn't even have colors..
synapse
Sep 10 2009, 02:40 PM
P.S. due to the nature of the camera, you can't even shoot stills with it. So, I'm sure that's another reason they don't want to launch the touch equipped with a camera, people with the touch should be able to have a camera capable of taking stills.
creole
Sep 10 2009, 07:59 PM
lol, the vid quality still sucks. and the positioning for the video recorder is a bit awkward. i'm just gonna update my ipod touch to the new firmware for $5... just for damn voice over . -_-
synapse
Sep 10 2009, 08:22 PM
The best thing to the new nano's is probably the FM radio with live pause.
Another article to the ipod touch not having a camera reasoning:
http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2009/09/ipod-touch-camera/
creole
Sep 10 2009, 08:47 PM
lol. . wait until apple has an icamera or other crazy stuff
synapse
Sep 10 2009, 11:12 PM
QUOTE(Beenly @ Sep 10 2009, 09:47 PM)
lol. . wait until apple has an icamera or other crazy stuff
nah, that's one of the things they compared their ipod nano with a camera to, the flip mino hd. They wanted more than just a video capture
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.