Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Even Stephen King thinks she sucks
Forums > Community Center > Academia > Books
hypnotique
http://omg.yahoo.com/news/stephen-king-on-...a-darn/18406?nc

BAHAHHAHAAHA I SPIT OUT SODA READING THAT.

Finally someone to puncture her inflated gay ego she got going on.thank you jesus
Gigi
QUOTE
Both Rowling and Meyer, they're speaking directly to young people... The real difference is that Jo Rowling is a terrific writer and Stephenie Meyer can't write worth a darn. She's not very good.


THANK YOU.
batman
hahaha oooh steven king.

pet cemetery made me hate life >.<
i actually got the shivers from reading the last chapter.
hypnotique
Man i love how a legend basically falcon punched her mormon gut.
ironicsilence
Haha thats too funny!
I love Stephen King!
btw you could have left out that Mormon part. :/
dosomethin888
Wow, thats not very nice. What an arse.
hypnotique
^Its true though.

She runs around thinking shes a f*cking epic author and someone needed to set her ass straight.
dosomethin888
QUOTE(hypnotique @ Feb 3 2009, 08:09 PM) *
^Its true though.

She runs around thinking shes a f*cking epic author and someone needed to set her ass straight.

Does she really? I never got the impression that she thinks she is great or anything. She seems pretty humble. But, compared to Rowling and King... ya, there is no competition.
Tramatize
HAHA thats the f*cking best thing ever!
Simba
KO'd
Janette
Kudos to King. hatsoff.gif
Comptine
QUOTE(dosomethin888 @ Feb 3 2009, 10:20 PM) *
Does she really? I never got the impression that she thinks she is great or anything. She seems pretty humble. But, compared to Rowling and King... ya, there is no competition.


Compared to anyone, she's a bad writer. I got sucked into it at first because it was entertaining. But when I reread some parts and read Eclipse, I realized that she has no sense of flow, tone, direction, dialogue, or anything that would fill her writing with substance.

Basically, she pulls everything out of her ass, puts hot people in it, and calls it a story. I've seen it before on fanfiction.net

And Stephen King is epic. Don't argue with him. He can shit on other authors as much as he wants because he's Stephen King.
hypnotique
QUOTE
And Stephen King is epic. Don't argue with him. He can shit on other authors as much as he wants because he's Stephen King.


Hes like the f*cking chuck norris of books. except instead of a roundhouse kick to the face you get a book and some disses about your shitty writing thrown at your face.
lovefooled
QUOTE(dosomethin888 @ Feb 3 2009, 10:20 PM) *
Does she really? I never got the impression that she thinks she is great or anything. She seems pretty humble. But, compared to Rowling and King... ya, there is no competition.

There's a few interviews where she comes out as so full of herself.

The books are entertaining but she is no way a great writer. I like how she randomly puts in "big" words. LOL.
Gigi
And italics! Or I think so. I only read her quotes from a book, but some words were italicized and I hope they were her doing. Because it's insulting to pretend your readers are retards and cannot figure out for themselves when a particular word in a sentence is important to the story.
Comptine
I only approve of italics used regular in a story is if it's in first person and the italics are used to convey the tone of how the person talks/thinks.

Okay, those are pretty bad but Breaking Dawn was awful. Eclipse barely had a plot. Breaking Dawn was just... @*!#$

1) Of course her daughter is freakin' hawt. And apparently, she has accelerated growth but MAGICALLY stops aging at a HAWT age for Jacob to get with.
2)So apparently, she got pregnant because she melted Edward's junk.

How can she crap that shit out and make millions??? And people go crazy over it?!?!

Gigi
WTF?

I've never read this shit before but I was sure it at least made sense, but I'm not so sure anymore.
hypnotique
QUOTE(Comptine @ Feb 4 2009, 01:08 AM) *
I only approve of italics used regular in a story is if it's in first person and the italics are used to convey the tone of how the person talks/thinks.

Okay, those are pretty bad but Breaking Dawn was awful. Eclipse barely had a plot. Breaking Dawn was just... @*!#$

1) Of course her daughter is freakin' hawt. And apparently, she has accelerated growth but MAGICALLY stops aging at a HAWT age for Jacob to get with.
2)So apparently, she got pregnant because she melted Edward's junk.

How can she crap that shit out and make millions??? And people go crazy over it?!?!

LOL WUT.

Melted?
brooklyneast05
QUOTE(lovefooled @ Feb 4 2009, 02:58 AM) *
The books are entertaining but she is no way a great writer. I like how she randomly puts in "big" words. LOL.

yeah i've always said this is like my number one annoyance at her writing. that she writes on a 4th grade reading level and randomly puts in big words for no apparent reason. it's not as if they are needed to get the point across. it's like she wrote it and then went and found a bigger fancier synonym in her thesarus for a word just to sound smart, when it actually doesn't. it sounds awkward and pointless in the context of her wittle teenage vampire cheese romance.

J.K. ROWLING 4 LYFE
tokyo-rose
My friend was reading Perez Hilton's blog and came across this post. I was like, "YES, THANK YOU, STEPHEN KING."
RelleJae
Stephen King is right about how J.K Rowling is a good writer she is one of the best but i do have to say i do like Twilight its not better then Harry Potter but is still a very good writer
Amaranthus
Stephanie Meyer is wildly popular only because she writes at a 4th grade reading level, making it virtually possible for any and every ange group to read it, even those who don't enjoy reading. Oh, and because vampires make girls horny.
Comptine
QUOTE(RelleJae @ Feb 4 2009, 08:42 PM) *
Stephen King is right about how J.K Rowling is a good writer she is one of the best but i do have to say i do like Twilight its not better then Harry Potter but is still a very good writer


There's a difference between a very good writer and a decent story teller.

People describe Kurt Vonnegut as a very good writer. In no way can those words apply to Stephenie Meyer.

/twilight hate (I can't believe I bought the first 3 books)
Amaranthus
I never really enjoyed the Harry Potter books.

So without jumping down my throat, can someone explain how she's such a good writer? I'm truly curious.
Comptine
JK Rowling? Or Stephenie Meyer?
Amaranthus
Sorry, J.K. Rowling.
Comptine
She's not like a literature mastermind but she knows how to tell a story really well. Harry Potter is if you get into or not, just like any other author/series.
Gigi
Agreed. She's definitely not the best writer in the world, but her successes with the series reflects upon her kickass ability to tell a story. Whereas Twilight lady sucks ass with the writing, but manages to sell books.

I hate it when people say "Well at least they're reading books rather than watching television." Honestly I'd rather my daughter spend time watching television than reading a sappy chick's book about vampires and melted junk and apples and sexy abstinence and other shit that makes no sense.

You know what pisses me off the most? When the middle-aged women rave about how they love Twilight. STFU BITCH AND PICK UP A COSMO AND THEN WATCH OPRAH/THE VIEW. GOD.
Joanne
What I find funny about the Twilight series is that it really does pull in people. A friend of mine who I was absolutely certain would HATE the series (I mean, come on... vampires?) actually got sucked in and enjoyed the book. But then again she said the plot was really childish and that the writing style was dreadful. Apparently the hardest word in the first book was "terra cotta".

She was also very disappointed when she found out Robert Pattinson was Edward Cullen.
technicolour
QUOTE(Gigi @ Feb 4 2009, 09:26 PM) *
You know what pisses me off the most? When the middle-aged women rave about how they love Twilight. STFU BITCH AND PICK UP A COSMO AND THEN WATCH OPRAH/THE VIEW. GOD.


And this is why I LOVE reading your posts, Gigi. Seriously.
Tramatize
Haha, i haven't read or even taken a look at any twilight books, but just by the looks of it i know i wont like it, its one of those things you can't stand, yet have no reason too.
But my literature teacher is reading the first book, and reading this Stephen King article made me laugh, because my teacher usually has a good taste in things like that, even tho shes annoying and has to have EVERYTHING proper, she'll get steamed if she sees/hears someone say "Hisself".
Gigi
If that's the case, wouldn't he be similarly jealous of JK Rowling?

TBH Stephen King doesn't need to be jealous of another author's appeal with his already immense success.
Gigi
Wait, that makes no sense. So you're saying that he's jealous because she's got appeal (which he has as well) and because she's a bad writer (and he's a good writer)? I don't know if that's jealousy; that sort of implies indignation.
technicolour
I think what he's saying is that, more or less, King's pissed/jealous because Meyer is so popular and yet a horrible writer.
Comptine
I don't think jealous is the word.

I think it's indignation at having his art form get shat on.
HeartOfPandora
^ Pretty much.

He's an amazing amazing and his books have such presence, and then some second rate bitch comes along and completely destroys any vision the world might have had for great novelists. I swear to you, five years from now, we're going to see at least ten books spawned from this stupid series, and they're going to be crap, and they're going to have the same style of writing. Repeat process.

Also, anyone else notice that she used the EXACT same story plot in all of her books?! Intense focus on Bella, she whines / gets her way, something goes horribly, horribly wrong and it looks like the end of the world - but wait! A miraculous save. Oohh no I lied, something else horrid happens and it's all crap again, but then Edward saves the day and they all live happily ever after - or at least until Bella screws it up again. _dry.gif

Major props to King for calling her out. Blaaaah, making me rant...
hypnotique
QUOTE(divergent @ Feb 4 2009, 10:05 PM) *
cmon, king's just jealous she's got appeal.


THAT IS NOT FUNNY.

CAN SOMEONE PLEASE EXPLAIN THIS MELTED JUNK CONCEPT I HAVE BEEN SEEING?
technicolour
I think what people are failing to realize is that Meyers books are from the perspective of a 17/18 year old GIRL. Come on, of course the writing isn't going to be superior and eloquent. That just wouldn't fit with the story.

Also, King's books are geared more towards adults, generally speaking. And yes his writing is MUCH better. But that's because he's writing a whole different type of story.

Meyer's writing is as plain as an apple. But King's writing is like an apple pie, perfect ingredients all created together for one delicious result.

Maybe delicious was the wrong word...
Gigi
^ Hmm. While your point is valid, I can't help thinking that just because something is from a young girl's perspective, it doesn't give her the right to dumb down the material. In fact it's rather insulting to an 18 year old girl like myself.

I'd probably say her writing is more for adolescent girls to read. But the ease of readability of the book, plus the uh, attractive plot has caused an massive amount of people to get into it too. I don't think she ever intended for readers over the age of 15, and male readers, to get into her books.
technicolour
It is incredibly dumbed down. I won't argue with that. I don't necessarily find it insulting, more like incredibly easy reading. I love reading James Patterson and even Jane Austen and with those you kind of have to pay attention and be wary where you left off in the story. With these, they're just really simple reading. Like Lemony Snicket's Series of Unfortunate Events.

I think in the beginning it was intended for just 13-16 year old girls to read. But it blew up and EVERYONE started reading it.

I haven't read a single Harry Potter book, so I can't compare it to Rowling's.
batman
Meyer's problem goes far beyond just "dumbed down" writing. Her Mary Sue characters and incredibly flat and disappointing plot-line are what, in my opinion, makes her a horrible author. I hate what she's done with vampires, I hate her main characters, etc.

To tell the truth, I have no clue why I read all four books. I guess I wanted to see what would happen after each one, hoping that things would get better, but it was just one disappointment after another.
HeartOfPandora
QUOTE(technicolour @ Feb 5 2009, 01:53 PM) *
Meyer's writing is as plain as an apple. But King's writing is like an apple pie, perfect ingredients all created together for one delicious result.

Maybe delicious was the wrong word...

loool.gif
hypnotique
QUOTE(technicolour @ Feb 5 2009, 01:53 PM) *
I think what people are failing to realize is that Meyers books are from the perspective of a 17/18 year old GIRL. Come on, of course the writing isn't going to be superior and eloquent. That just wouldn't fit with the story.

Also, King's books are geared more towards adults, generally speaking. And yes his writing is MUCH better. But that's because he's writing a whole different type of story.

Meyer's writing is as plain as an apple. But King's writing is like an apple pie, perfect ingredients all created together for one delicious result.

Maybe delicious was the wrong word...

hmmm i want apple pie now.
livwho
DEFINITELY Rowling ftw. I'm ready to burn my Twilight books.
brooklyneast05
they suck
PurpleDaze112
QUOTE(Gigi @ Feb 4 2009, 11:26 PM) *
Agreed. She's definitely not the best writer in the world, but her successes with the series reflects upon her kickass ability to tell a story. Whereas Twilight lady sucks ass with the writing, but manages to sell books.

I hate it when people say "Well at least they're reading books rather than watching television." Honestly I'd rather my daughter spend time watching television than reading a sappy chick's book about vampires and melted junk and apples and sexy abstinence and other shit that makes no sense.

You know what pisses me off the most? When the middle-aged women rave about how they love Twilight. STFU BITCH AND PICK UP A COSMO AND THEN WATCH OPRAH/THE VIEW. GOD.


Amen. Seriously, people make it out like if a 16 year old (btw, and you should be reading REAL books by that age) picks up some shitty book they'll just start reading plato and bronte overnight. they'll just keep reading sixth grade books and eventually de-volve into a vh1 reality show contestant. It's sad.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.