i made a graphic with the word "ho" on it (there was more to it, lol)
but it got turned down for profanity
uuh ive seen graphics with worse stuff on them,
but just wondering who agrees with me? o.o

Moved to Feedback.

LOL. no. it wasnt anything like that -_-

What'd it look like? (the graphic)

Oh was it that Brock one? Did I reject it?

Elsewhere, you mean? Or on CreateBlog? CB doesn't accept submissions with profanity or anything not PG-13 on them, so you can't really compare what we accept to what other sites accept.

yes manny :( i didnt think it was that bad. it was cute if anything..
and yes, on CB, or else i wouldnt mention it. im not stupid, thanks.

I wasn't saying that you were stupid. :\ Anyway, can you please link to the image?

Hey now, it's all good.

Can you post the graphic please?

Yeah, it was cute but that wasn't really the only reason I rejected it. The image quality was also low "/

sorry im just frustrated ><
yes disregarding the image quality though. that can be fixed..

the icon

I LIKE IT!!

lmao, that's funny.

I don't really like how it says hoes, but it is funny. *shrug, I don't think its worth rejecting though as well.

lol thanks xD ..i usually have problems with image quality, but w/e

I've seen worse accepted around here than that as well. Not to throw anyone down but its true. That's actually really funny, but as Thomas made an example of, if it was like that, then no it should automatically be rejected.



Yea the colors are a bit saturated, but that's the only fault.

I don't get how people are saying it looks low quality 0_o It looks fine to me.

ehh usually when i upload things on CB they turn out fuzzier.. i uploaded this one on photobucket, i think thats why

It looks pretty blurry to me and the question mark on "at?" is cut off. I don't see much offense in the phrase though, that's totally Brock. I would just try to fix the coloring some, sharpen it a bit, move the text over a tad and resubmit.

Yeah so I guess I'm a little too strict on the rules?

It's all good Natalia. Sometimes it's a challenge when interpreting "crude", since it's such a subjective term.

Oh dear, I hope this isn't going to turn into a debate as to what is profane and what isn't.

Bah. Ignore this.

It's fine. Like everyone else said, tweak it a bit and resubmit it. Thanks for being so understanding, hah.

ho is spelled: "H03".. just to let you all know.. so its not really anything bad if it has HO cause that could mean: "HO HO HO!" so you might as well reject a SANTA CLAUS Graphic that has him singing HO HO HO!

I dont think its the spelling but rather the meaning that should have more emphasis, but I disagree with that icon being rejected :]

i kinda agree now soo much on what it says, its too funny but on how it looks. Its low quality and too saturated.