Mr. Slowjamz
Aug 9 2005, 12:49 AM
more and more i start to see indie music start to rise from the depths of the underground ..and start to turn mainstream ...ic more people liking coldplay , common , and any specific such of indie type music ....more people are getting bored of the same old music ..... I personally think this will revolutionize the way Music is in the upcoming generations .......i even myself cant keep up with this movement in music .
Soo what do you guys think , will there be such a change in the way music is today .... i think so .
mystline
Aug 9 2005, 01:38 AM
Wait, what? Common's indie?! .. 
Heh, well, yeah. I think indie is becoming more popular than it was. I once heard a Postal Service song on the radio. That's really rare. YEAHYEAH. Almost everyone at my school used to hate the postal service and now they love'em. And the Plain White T's. I believe they're indie.
Saeglopur
Aug 9 2005, 02:11 AM
There's always a change in music. o.O
I like weird music... so it can't possibly be on the radio. It's weird.
sw33t_rouge
Aug 9 2005, 06:14 AM
indie music..sometimes sound a bit.. xP
angel-roh
Aug 9 2005, 08:33 AM
I think everyone is gona turn to Indie music. Half of my friends did. They used to be hardcore on rock music, but now they are like into indie music. My sister is one of them

So yeah I think it's Indie music turn haha.
Lets see it used to be hiphop...now it's rock and later it will be indie. I wish techno will be the next round after Indie haha.
Mr. Slowjamz
Aug 9 2005, 08:47 AM
yea indie means independent labels...it doesnt have to be rock only ...it could be rap etc ....and i know common he just gives me a good interpretation from other rappers out there .
veve
Aug 9 2005, 09:58 AM
Coldplay IS NOT INDIE. What would make you think that?!
yupimchuck
Aug 9 2005, 10:11 AM
i never really thought of common as indie.
but i hate when the underground/indi bands get all big
its happening alot. their music IMO, just starts to suck.
aznxdarkricex
Aug 9 2005, 05:36 PM
as long as you're on an independent label instead of a major one you're an "indie artist" it doesn't really imply anything about the status of the artist
me1issaaaa
Aug 9 2005, 06:08 PM
I love most "Indie" bands, I think they're great, but it's just a label. I do think it will become more popular and everything. And Coldplay isn't really Indie, aren't they more... mainstream?
iiTsDAYNA
Aug 9 2005, 08:57 PM
I've heard alot of it lately. I DONT like that type of music. I think its trashy. EGHH..I hope it doesnt rise any farther than it already has.
Mr. Slowjamz
Aug 9 2005, 10:22 PM
yea.... all of you are right ......im just trying to get a message on how these type of artists , who have been playing for years ....start to open up on like hit music stations
tweeak
Aug 9 2005, 10:41 PM
when was coldplay ever indie? no no nonono. of course underground bands are becoming more popular. that's how most good bands emerge.
tweeak
Aug 9 2005, 10:42 PM
when was coldplay ever indie? no no nonono. of course underground bands are becoming more popular. that's how most good bands emerge.
seriouslynikki
Aug 9 2005, 11:00 PM
It feels like the indie generation these days...well, they are a bit more "heard" than before.
sweetest-emotion
Aug 10 2005, 01:45 AM
coldplay i guess u can say was indie when their "parachutes" album came out. i could see them being indie before they became mainstream. they have that sound. i never knew i would like indie till i discovered the postal service. LUV LUV LUV em'. prolly my fav band. i heard them at a dance recital of all things, and i'm enthralled. now they're becoming popular and i'm afraid they'll become too popular to be uniquely the postal service. kinda how coldplay ended up.
toodlepops.
Aug 10 2005, 02:52 AM
QUOTE
Indie Music Rising ?
And that is a problem?
mipadi
Aug 10 2005, 09:15 AM
QUOTE(tweeak @ Aug 9 2005, 11:41 PM)
when was coldplay ever indie? no no nonono. of course underground bands are becoming more popular. that's how most good bands emerge.
Actually, Coldplay's first label was Fierce Panda, which
is an independent record label. Now they are handled by Parlophone (in the UK) and Capitol (in the US), which are both part of the EMI Group, which is a record label; so they're not indie anymore, but they were at one time.
Remember, indie and alternative are not the same thing. It's unlikely, but possible for a mainstream band to be handled by an indie record label.
ktsou11
Aug 10 2005, 11:56 AM
yea, i think you're right. all my friends are into it. personally, i think it's ok but it's not something that i would fall into.
tweeak
Aug 10 2005, 04:09 PM
QUOTE(mipadi @ Aug 10 2005, 9:15 AM)
Remember, indie and alternative are not the same thing. It's unlikely, but possible for a mainstream band to be handled by an indie record label.
But in the more common sense of the word, that's not what indie implies. Besides which, the only decent radio station here plays "everything alternative" but the most obscure things they play are the flaming lips and the shins
not_your_average
Aug 10 2005, 06:32 PM
QUOTE(tweeak @ Aug 10 2005, 4:09 PM)
But in the more common sense of the word, that's not what indie implies. Besides which, the only decent radio station here plays "everything alternative" but the most obscure things they play are the flaming lips and the shins
Indie: music independent of the mainstream because they are not part of a big record label.
But I don't see why it's so bad for an indie band to go mainstream. Take Death Cab for Cutie for example. Really talented guys in that band, but they used to not be manistream. Now that they've gained exposure over the years, they're becoming more and more popular. Therefore, kids who used to listen to really crappy music could open their ears to an awesome band.
tweeak
Aug 10 2005, 07:02 PM
It''s what happens after they go mainstread that's bad. Sure, it's good when a band gets recognized, but it;s really annoying when people start obsessing and being stupid. Because frankly, people are stupid.
veve
Aug 10 2005, 07:38 PM
QUOTE(not_your_average @ Aug 10 2005, 6:32 PM)
Indie: music independent of the mainstream because they are not part of a big record label.
But I don't see why it's so bad for an indie band to go mainstream. Take Death Cab for Cutie for example. Really talented guys in that band, but they used to not be manistream. Now that they've gained exposure over the years, they're becoming more and more popular. Therefore, kids who used to listen to really crappy music could open their ears to an awesome band.
we'll see how their new album's gonna be ..... then we can talk
mipadi
Aug 10 2005, 08:08 PM
QUOTE(not_your_average @ Aug 10 2005, 7:32 PM)
But I don't see why it's so bad for an indie band to go mainstream. Take Death Cab for Cutie for example. Really talented guys in that band, but they used to not be manistream. Now that they've gained exposure over the years, they're becoming more and more popular. Therefore, kids who used to listen to really crappy music could open their ears to an awesome band.
It's because once a band goes to a major label, the label has more control over their music than the band does, which heavily influences creative direction. A major label is interested in only one thing, money, whereas an indie label--and, therefore, a band on an indie label--is often genuinely interested in art or getting across an idea.
Take a look at any of Ian Mackaye's bands. They all stayed indie, and one fact about them is that they rarely played a show that cost more than $10. Why? Because they felt people should have the opportunity to listen to them, because they had a message, and they were interested in music, not making money. Find a non-indie band that has shows for $10 today--it's pretty damned difficult, if not impossible. Why? Because the labels handling those bands don't care about art or music or messages--they care about money.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.