Pulchritude
Apr 9 2005, 12:23 PM
ok my friend and I were argueing bout which sport was harder since she is on the track team and im on the wrestling team.. She kept saying track was wayy harder than wrestling and me yelling back at her saying no its not!..haha well i know it has to do with everyones opinion but i would like to see what you guys think and please be specific..
by the way i searched the 3 first pages too se eif theres a topic on this.. and i didnt see any so if there is it must be old..
cocoalightning27
Apr 9 2005, 12:36 PM
hmmmm I do track but not wrestling....track is tough because of you get tired after the few practice...i don't think it's as hard has wrestling since we don't grab things and use ouor arm muscles....so I say Track is Easier
heyyfrankie
Apr 9 2005, 02:35 PM
track = wrestling
---
in track, you will probably need more speed than technique because you are running.
in wrestling, you will probably need more technique than speed, though you must be quick, too. so i think that they are equal.
voguelove
Jan 27 2006, 10:23 PM
pshh track owns wrestling. (in my opinon)
you may have to lift weights for wrestling and do a little bit of running but track does both as well. we've got 2-3 hour practices daily running around the track and doing different workouts for meets. your legs end up getting tired after a few minutes and its hard to keep up with some.
EddieV
Jan 27 2006, 10:24 PM
NOne is harder. I'm a fast runner, and a submission wrestler.
nwhs_killaballa33
Jan 31 2006, 03:30 PM
there both hard in there own way but i guess if i had to choose i wud pick track seeing as im in it but wrestling is more physical which makes it hard but with track u have to have alot of stamina and will power to run so thats also hard
AceShadows
Jan 31 2006, 09:35 PM
Wrestling. My opinion.
silver-rain
Jan 31 2006, 10:31 PM
Track is hard, because depending on what event you run, it's about building up your endurance for long distances or your speed and power for sprints.
I do track, so I would think it is harder.
Levy2k6
Jan 31 2006, 10:34 PM
i imagine track is harder, i wouldn't really know but they are very close..
i'd argue that swimming is harder than both of these tho.. but this isnt what this topic is about to so i'll leave it at that.
KissMe2408
Feb 7 2006, 11:55 PM
I have a bunch of guy friends that do both,
and most of them say wrestling is harder.
I've watched a lot of their wrestling practices and it was brutal.
They didn't just wrestle. They were outside doing sprints, and they had to run along with the track team one practice.
For soccer we used to run about half of what the track team would run, and i was dying at the end lol.
So personally, I have no idea...I think they are both hard, just in different ways.
My guy friends say wresting, so i dunno, take your pick.
FLIPxADDICTION
Feb 7 2006, 11:58 PM
wrestling seems harder
well that's probably because i only do track not wrestling
=/
klumzy
Feb 8 2006, 01:14 AM
they're both hard.. but if i had to choose between the 2, id pick wrestling
Crich323
Feb 8 2006, 04:43 PM
Both are very hard to do. I'm in track but I do the field events. (I'm not in shape though and find it very easy)
Very Tough choice...... I think I would have to go with track.
my choice would be biased though, because I'm in track and have never wrestled.
jeung
Apr 4 2006, 03:22 PM
moved to interests -> sports forum
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.