QUOTE(deteam @ Feb 24 2010, 11:51 AM)
besides the low quality of the original fool
You didn't specify to anyone anything about the quality, so I say it's a pretty good critique. Aside from that, why on earth would you even use a low quality image to work with in the first place? You need to use better looking photos than that, because I can see some scattered pixels on certain parts of the image.
QUOTE(brooklyneast05 @ Feb 24 2010, 04:12 PM)
if it's just a case of you trying to take a bad image and make it look better...i think it looks worse edited. it's overly saturated, overly contrasted, and has even more blown out exposure. i think it just makes it more obvious that it's bad quality.