It doesn't matter because the Military is backing up America's citizens, not the Government. There's so many things not being reported (duh... the revolution will not be televised) that many Americans aren't even aware as to what's coming.
I see hundreds of thousands of troops in Iraq and Afghanistan that seem to be acting on behalf of the government, and not on the will of the American citizens.
I highly doubt a coup d'état is imminent.
I'm disappointed and disgusted. Talk about legislating from the bench. This is like Plessy v. Ferguson.
I don't think this is a case of legislating from the bench. Even though I strongly disagree with Proposition 8, from a legal standpoint, the court made a correct decision: the people of California voted to amend their constitution, and did so in a completely legal way. The decision to amend the constitution is discriminatory in nature, but unfortunately they did so in a legal way. Had the court overturned a legal amendment, then it would have been "legislating from the bench". The court's job is to determine the legality of certain actions, not dictate laws.
That said, I think the people of California made a poor decision last fall.
Personally, I'm somewhat in agreement with Kryo on this: I don't think the government should have a say in marriage. I think the legal term -- for everyone -- should be civil union, and I think everyone should be entitled to joining in a civil union with anyone they wish. I do think that individual churches have the right to refuse to marry two homosexuals, since personal and religious rights are paramount here. But I think the government should grant a civil union to any couple, regardless of sexuality.
Or, better yet, I don't think the government should recognize unions at all. Tax benefits, etc., to married couples inherently discriminate against people who remain single.
