KINGdinguhling
Feb 1 2009, 10:17 PM
DoubleJ
Feb 1 2009, 10:18 PM
Take pride in knowing that you just won a tainted superbowl!!!
sixfive
Feb 1 2009, 10:20 PM
Sore losers.
^_____________________^
time to go run a website and take an eight month hiatus
KINGdinguhling
Feb 1 2009, 10:20 PM
actually i dont care, im a raiders fan ahah
hi-C
Feb 1 2009, 10:21 PM
Seriously, keep it to the one Super Bowl thread, guys.
Closed.
DoubleJ
Feb 1 2009, 10:56 PM
Reopened no offense, but the topics are originally meant to discuss two different things.
This superbowl for me will be tainted just like serena williams vs capriati us open 03
technicolour
Feb 1 2009, 10:58 PM
Why was this Super Bowl tainted?
DoubleJ
Feb 1 2009, 10:59 PM
They didn't review the play to see if Warner's arm was going forward or not....Clearly it was.
SuckDickNSaveLives
Feb 1 2009, 11:02 PM
QUOTE(technicolour @ Feb 1 2009, 11:58 PM)

Why was this Super Bowl tainted?
At one point the penalty count was
2 penalties for 15 yards Steelers
8 for 91 yards for the Cards
That was before the 2 questionable of 3 personal foul calls that put them in field goal range to make the score 20 - 7. Shit was ridiculous to watch.
technicolour
Feb 1 2009, 11:41 PM
QUOTE(DoubleJ @ Feb 1 2009, 09:59 PM)

They didn't review the play to see if Warner's arm was going forward or not....Clearly it was.
It so was! That was a crap call.
sixfive
Feb 1 2009, 11:43 PM
his arm was stopped before he fumbled it, he didn't attempt to throw again, valid call
KINGdinguhling
Feb 1 2009, 11:45 PM
call coulda went either way, depended on the refs
LittleMissSunshine
Feb 1 2009, 11:54 PM
lol (x it was a good game though.
hypnotique
Feb 2 2009, 01:59 AM
QUOTE(kryogenix @ Feb 1 2009, 09:20 PM)

Sore losers.
^_____________________^
time to go run a website and take an eight month hiatus
Hahhaa
has jusun always has that avatar?
fameONE
Feb 2 2009, 02:43 AM
I made $500 from the Superbowl.
mipadi
Feb 2 2009, 10:37 AM
QUOTE(DoubleJ @ Feb 1 2009, 10:59 PM)

They didn't review the play to see if Warner's arm was going forward or not....Clearly it was.
They did review it, and decided that he did, in fact, fumble.
DoubleJ
Feb 2 2009, 12:05 PM
QUOTE(mipadi @ Feb 2 2009, 10:37 AM)

They did review it, and decided that he did, in fact, fumble.
Uhm....they reviewed it AFTER the game and celebration.
mipadi
Feb 2 2009, 02:53 PM
QUOTE(DoubleJ @ Feb 2 2009, 12:05 PM)

Uhm....they reviewed it AFTER the game and celebration.
No, the reviewed it right after the play -- that's why it took a while for the Steelers to actually run their final kneel-down. Stuff like that almost always gets automatically reviewed, even though the network might run the commercials instead of showing the ref actually going over to the hood.
Maccabee
Feb 2 2009, 03:41 PM
QUOTE(WarMachine @ Feb 2 2009, 01:43 AM)

I made $500 from the Superbowl.
Thats right
But what if you had lost

Thats why i dont bet.
Sycophant
Feb 2 2009, 05:15 PM
creole
Feb 2 2009, 05:18 PM
more than average of the fans knew the steelers would win, ;/
hi-C
Feb 2 2009, 05:20 PM
QUOTE(Sycophant @ Feb 2 2009, 05:15 PM)

OH MY GOD THANK YOU.
smoke
Feb 2 2009, 06:53 PM
ARIZONERS SHOULD HAD WUNZ!!!!!1!!11!!
Sorry, my inner, angry, drunken sports fan took over for a second. Sorry to anyone HE has offended.
Ha, I was pulling for Arizona but I didn't really care. I'm a Bucs fan... Yeah yeah har har, I know, shut up.
KINGdinguhling
Feb 2 2009, 09:04 PM
ROFLLL CHARGERS > BUCS
DoubleJ
Feb 2 2009, 09:07 PM
QUOTE(mipadi @ Feb 2 2009, 02:53 PM)

No, the reviewed it right after the play -- that's why it took a while for the Steelers to actually run their final kneel-down. Stuff like that almost always gets automatically reviewed, even though the network might run the commercials instead of showing the ref actually going over to the hood.
Explain to me how their were no commercials in between the supposed fumble and the running off of the clock. It clearly said on espn that they reviewed it after the game.
smoke
Feb 2 2009, 09:10 PM
QUOTE(KINGdinguhling @ Feb 2 2009, 10:04 PM)

ROFLLL CHARGERS > BUCS
LAWLZ BUCS > EVERY1S!
I can't help it. I'm from Tampa. It's in my blood.
KINGdinguhling
Feb 2 2009, 09:17 PM
too shay
creole
Feb 2 2009, 09:32 PM
QUOTE(smoke @ Feb 2 2009, 06:10 PM)

LAWLZ BUCS < EVERY1S!
I can't help it. I'm from Tampa. It's in my blood.
I'm from Da Burg. I hate them. The whole Bucs fanatics say they'll do better, but they always seem to fail.
I was at the Super Bowl Breakfast in Tampa, I just hope what they say comes true.
smoke
Feb 2 2009, 09:51 PM
QUOTE(ninjaBeenly @ Feb 2 2009, 10:32 PM)

I'm from Da Burg. I hate them. The whole Bucs fanatics say they'll do better, but they always seem to fail.
I was at the Super Bowl Breakfast in Tampa, I just hope what they say comes true.
Yeah well I was pissed for awhile that they had a dream team and then traded everyone to pay off for that stupid ass, overly priced pirate ship. (Actually, it's really cool in person, but I'm trying to make a point.) It's no wonder they aren't that great anymore. It's all about money these days, not the team. That's why the Rays were so popular last year. They're just a good, wholesome baseball team. We need more of that in sports.
mipadi
Feb 2 2009, 10:08 PM
QUOTE(DoubleJ @ Feb 2 2009, 09:07 PM)

Explain to me how their were no commercials in between the supposed fumble and the running off of the clock. It clearly said on espn that they reviewed it after the game.
Reviews only take a minute or so.
Even so, there was no "incontrovertible evidence" that he was making a forward pass. The call is certainly debatable, but it's certainly quite possible (most likely) that he was tucking the ball, &c.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.