dilligrout
Nov 10 2008, 10:19 AM
What do you think of the new Profile 2.0?
aym
Nov 10 2008, 12:59 PM
QUOTE(kreios @ Nov 10 2008, 12:36 PM)

Moved to Designer's Cafe
I like the idea of it, being completely customizable, within myspace itself. I haven't seen what people are able to do with the Myspace 2.0 profiles yet. I hope that 1.0 css/html are still valid with the 2.0 css. :/ maybe that's hoping for too much.
Well, TOM said something of CSS!! But I'm also trying to figure
it out...I mean he accepts my actual myspace-design that I used in
"1.0" but he won't take over background and add the one big picture
I used in it....PLUS he still shows the 2.0-stuff underneath mashed
together xD
aym
schizo
Nov 10 2008, 06:13 PM
Well, the little Tom notice said you don't have to use 2.0. If codes don't work right in 2.0, you could always switch back.

Other than the new navigation, I really don't pay attention to all these pointless changes. I still haven't even switched to the new home skin.
JackRapington
Nov 10 2008, 06:21 PM
QUOTE(schizo @ Nov 10 2008, 05:13 PM)

I still haven't even switched to the new home skin.
I thought I was the only one.
schizo
Nov 10 2008, 07:34 PM
^ME TOO!
You learn something new everyday.
RCKstarh
Nov 10 2008, 07:44 PM
i dont care too much about the new profile. i switched nd then switched bak cuz i dont like the way it looked really....
allvanishing
Nov 10 2008, 09:01 PM
I still can code in 2.0. You can use number signs (#) now. Not one of the best things though.
I kinda like how it looks. It doesn't look pre-2000.
Vaguememory
Nov 10 2008, 11:25 PM
I think that once people start figuring out how the coding works we can get some pretty good looking layouts out. It looks much better than the old gaudy myspace layout default. This looks much more sleak and I'm just anxious to see what everybody does with it.
Brighter
Nov 11 2008, 12:28 AM
I haven't seen it yet, and I don't really care.
As long as we still have the 1.0 option.
And as long as you can hide everything with CSS :)
dilligrout
Nov 11 2008, 12:43 AM
QUOTE(Vaguememory @ Nov 10 2008, 10:25 PM)

I think that once people start figuring out how the coding works we can get some pretty good looking layouts out. It looks much better than the old gaudy myspace layout default. This looks much more sleak and I'm just anxious to see what everybody does with it.
Kinda what I'm thinking. But I'm soo used to the old version. I like it better.
JackRapington
Nov 11 2008, 12:10 PM
QUOTE(rjohnson1991 @ Nov 10 2008, 11:43 PM)

Kinda what I'm thinking. But I'm soo used to the old version. I like it better.
Me too, but then again I have yet to try 2.0 out. ;] But unless It is not too much different as far as coding wise I will most likely, at least until no one wants them anymore, keep coding in 1.0.
dutchmastiff
Nov 11 2008, 01:17 PM
I found this here at Huey 2.0 page he is definitly one of the most useful peeps in the myspace forums("
http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fusea...endid=289857996")
CODE
here's a list of the profile 2.0 section classes
--------------------------------------
div#leaderboard {}
div#googleBar {}
div#topnav {}
div#header {}
div.content {}
div.basicInfoModule {}
div.musicPlayerModule {}
div.interestsModule {}
div.blurbsModule {}
div.friendSpaceModule {}
div.detailsModule {}
div.schoolsModule {}
div.companiesModule {}
div.networkingModule {}
div.videoSliderModule {}
div.commentsModule {}
div.mdpApplicationModule {}
div#footer {}
---------------------------------------
each of them have divs called this inside of them
div.moduleMid
div.moduleMid1
div.moduleMid2
those create the rounded border
---------------------------------------
the header div for each module is called this
h3.moduleHead
---------------------------------------
so, to put a background image on the header of the interests section (for example) you would use this css
div.interestsModule h3.moduleHead {background-image:url(URL);}
ley
Nov 11 2008, 03:29 PM
I like it im kinda all for having a simple profile
and i love the fact that u can choose
what parts of your profile are private
or make parts of it only visible by certain catagories
i give tom and his crew a high five for this one lol
lovescream
Nov 11 2008, 07:49 PM
I actually really like it.. I just didn't have enough time to figure out how to hide "About Me" words, etc. before actually saving.
But I liked it. For now, I'll keep it my way though.
PS, you can't view top friends / comments through Mozilla's View>No Style on 2.0's anymore. :(
manny-the-dino
Nov 11 2008, 09:11 PM
Topics Merged
Mikeplyts
Nov 12 2008, 02:50 PM
I don't know. The whole 2.0 thing is kind of cool but I'll stick with the 1.0 version. I'm too used to it. :)
Luna5
Nov 13 2008, 01:26 PM
I hate it. It won't let you put codes on the page!
hypnotique
Nov 13 2008, 02:05 PM
That is why I refuse to touch any new shit that ***hole Tom puts up.
Harp
Nov 13 2008, 03:10 PM
Can't you put CSS on it?
karmakiller
Nov 13 2008, 07:44 PM
I thought there was another topic on this.
Anyways, moving this to Designers' Cafe.
manny-the-dino
Nov 13 2008, 07:56 PM
^There is.
Topics Merged... again.
Mikeplyts
Nov 13 2008, 08:57 PM
The new profile 2.0 is pretty neat and handy for people who aren't familar with HTML/CSS but I like 1.0 better.
fixtatik
Nov 13 2008, 10:29 PM
^ it's also very handy for those who are familiar with it. it's all around easier; there are no tables to deal with anymore, and you can customize it to no ends. the little curved corners around the "modules"; you can change those borders with your own images. you can put friends and comments in separate scrolling divs (on 1.0 you could move them separately, but not so they scrolled). you can hide your entire profile with one line of code, without customizing your own profile by removing each section individually—perfect for people who make layouts for the public.
people were pleased when they found out they could replace the "blurbs" with your own image. now you can replace "blurbs," "about me," "who i'd like to meet," etc. with your own images without hiding the .orangetext15 class (since that's not even there anymore).
basically, it's more search engine friendly (perfect for companies and bands), and you can edit just about every aspect of it with CSS. honestly, i love 2.0.
Insurmountable
Nov 14 2008, 01:38 AM
*shrug
I don't really like it that much, but its not hard to learn at all. I'm messing with it now on one of my old test myspace's. I like my current layout on my regular myspace so that's why I didn't change over.
Anywho, I think once they finish working all the bugs out and finally finish the way they want people to customize them people will like it.
I think they said later next week they'll be done with it all.
brooklyneast05
Nov 14 2008, 07:43 AM
i think a huge plus is the fact it re-sizes pictures to fit into the tables. now i won't go to a page and see some idiot putting a 700x500 picture in their interest section anymore with horizontal scroll bars everywhere.
synatribe
Nov 14 2008, 08:50 AM
QUOTE(fixtatik @ Nov 13 2008, 10:29 PM)

^ it's also very handy for those who are familiar with it. it's all around easier; there are no tables to deal with anymore, and you can customize it to no ends. the little curved corners around the "modules"; you can change those borders with your own images. you can put friends and comments in separate scrolling divs (on 1.0 you could move them separately, but not so they scrolled). you can hide your entire profile with one line of code, without customizing your own profile by removing each section individually—perfect for people who make layouts for the public.
people were pleased when they found out they could replace the "blurbs" with your own image. now you can replace "blurbs," "about me," "who i'd like to meet," etc. with your own images without hiding the .orangetext15 class (since that's not even there anymore).
basically, it's more search engine friendly (perfect for companies and bands), and you can edit just about every aspect of it with CSS. honestly, i love 2.0.
me too:] I love 2.0 because of the fact that they are all in div modules now, instead of stupid nested tables. :]. Its web 2.0 friendlier :]
Insurmountable
Nov 14 2008, 11:34 AM
QUOTE(brooklyneast05 @ Nov 14 2008, 07:43 AM)

i think a huge plus is the fact it re-sizes pictures to fit into the tables. now i won't go to a page and see some idiot putting a 700x500 picture in their interest section anymore with horizontal scroll bars everywhere.
haha! I completely agree!
amplifyy
Nov 15 2008, 01:08 AM
Nope, don't like it.
It looks nice and its pretty good.
But whats will the websites that spent all their hard work on V1 layouts do?
amplifyy
Nov 15 2008, 02:29 PM
I'm saying if Myspace permanently switched to Profile V2.
tokyo-rose
Nov 16 2008, 10:40 AM
QUOTE(schizo @ Nov 10 2008, 06:13 PM)

Other than the new navigation, I really don't pay attention to all these pointless changes. I still haven't even switched to the new home skin.
Same here on both counts.
Luna5
Nov 23 2008, 09:18 PM
I don't think you can make your profile private either...?
Designsby1103
Dec 1 2008, 09:29 AM
i think its cool to see but i hate to use it i do not like it for my profile at alL!
CrimsonSkyGraphics
Dec 1 2008, 06:33 PM
It could have some cool options in it, but it really annoys me that the 1.0 css won't work with it. x_X I just made a bunch new 1.0 layouts for me site, too.
I hope it doesn't force us to eventually ONLY use 2.0. That would be a lot of work to change all the old layouts over to the new coding. x_x
ChaoticHeartCrash
Dec 1 2008, 07:36 PM
You can make your profile private.
The navigation is just as easy to edit (if not easier)
Personally, I like 2.0. It's easier to edit.
itsmattadams
Dec 1 2008, 11:11 PM
That it no longer uses tables.
Having modules viewable to a specific category.
Not having to worry about using IE/Safari/Opera browser hacks.
NaShae
Dec 2 2008, 06:25 PM
QUOTE(rjohnson1991 @ Nov 10 2008, 09:43 PM)

Kinda what I'm thinking. But I'm soo used to the old version. I like it better.
Yeah. Me, too.
Maybe, if I gave it a chance, and got used to it, some layout ideas would come, but for now I'm sticking with the 1.0
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.