mipadi
Sep 17 2008, 07:54 PM
This site uses Arial all over the place. But Arial is a cheap bastard font. Helvetica is much, much prettier. CreateBlog's stylesheet should prefer Helvetica over Arial.
Joanne
Sep 17 2008, 07:56 PM
I like Helvetica more too. =]
karmakiller
Sep 17 2008, 08:11 PM
Arial is still better than verdana. For some reason I don't have helvetica on my computer...
Gigi
Sep 17 2008, 08:29 PM
Helvetica is expensive.
mipadi
Sep 17 2008, 09:19 PM
Comes for free with Macs. Nyeh.
paperplane
Sep 17 2008, 09:25 PM
Why would anyone pay for a font?
rnicron
Sep 17 2008, 09:26 PM
QUOTE(mipadi @ Sep 17 2008, 09:19 PM)

Comes for free with Macs. Nyeh.
yes, it does.
helvetica is what we used to label all of our papers in my graphic design class.
Joanne
Sep 17 2008, 09:30 PM
^ Yeah, my prof and TA are requiring us to use Helvetica for our assignments in my Graphic Design course. Sucks Windows users like me.
paperplane
Sep 17 2008, 09:44 PM
Pirate it? I might right now, because I'm intrigued by this amazing font...
Joanne
Sep 17 2008, 09:50 PM
After scrambling to find someone with a computer that has Helvetica (and failing), I downloaded it. I didn't find too many 'good' torrents though...
paperplane
Sep 17 2008, 09:55 PM
private trackers ftw!
Gigi
Sep 17 2008, 11:24 PM
QUOTE(mipadi @ Sep 17 2008, 07:19 PM)

Comes for free with Macs. Nyeh.

You'd pay for a font if you don't want the watered-down pirated version of Helvetica, where it's probably named something lame like...Telvetica. I'm not taking graphic design so seeing Verdana around the forums isn't really pissing me off that much. =p
What really pisses me off, though, is when people change the font of their posts to something tiny and unreadable, or serif.
Joanne
Sep 17 2008, 11:28 PM
Or changing the alignment to center! WHY?!
paperplane
Sep 17 2008, 11:37 PM
That's why it's worth while to be invited to private trackers. The quality's much higher. I have no idea why you would ever find a watered down version of something like that? I don't actually know why I'm talking about this; the idea of paying for a font just seems absurd.
Gigi
Sep 17 2008, 11:54 PM
There are a ton of font-fakers out there - ew!
The only way I would justify paying for a font is if I was using it for commercial purposes.
gelionie
Sep 18 2008, 12:27 AM
I really hated Arial a few years ago...
and now I'm so used to seeing the font being used everywhere I don't feel it any more.
mipadi
Sep 18 2008, 12:44 AM
QUOTE(Gigi @ Sep 18 2008, 12:24 AM)

You'd pay for a font if you don't want the watered-down pirated version of Helvetica
You mean...Arial?
Gigi
Sep 18 2008, 12:57 AM
Joanne
Sep 18 2008, 01:06 AM
I got 6/10... I thought I could tell. =(
paperplane
Sep 18 2008, 01:08 AM
Failing to see how that font is any prettier.
I got a 6/10 too, but I'd never actually seen (or been aware of seeing Helvetica) before.
Joanne
Sep 18 2008, 01:11 AM
I only got 9/10 after reading the article on how to tell the difference. Damn that APPLE!
Even though I couldn't really tell the difference, I still like Helvetica more. And I never could have (or... I guess wanted to) handed in a paper with Arial font before, but I totally could have with Helvetica. =\
Gigi
Sep 18 2008, 01:12 AM
When I see Helvetica, I think JPod.
I don't really see how Helvetica is nicer either. It's probably just a Mac-user/graphic designer snobby preference, lol.
Joanne
Sep 18 2008, 01:14 AM
Maybe it's if it was a huge body of text you'd be able to tell the difference in prettiness? Hmm... I'm going to go try that now.
Edit: Never mind, I can't do it. Turns out the one I downloaded looks way uglier on Word than on InDesign.
Gigi
Sep 18 2008, 01:33 AM
^ Is that possible?
Joanne
Sep 18 2008, 01:48 AM
I don't know, it's weird... the font looked really nice when I used it for InDesign, but it looks about ten times uglier and pixelated on Word. WTF?!
Gigi
Sep 18 2008, 02:26 AM
Oh yeah InDesign and other Adobe things tend to anti-alias font. Word = gross.
gelionie
Sep 18 2008, 03:40 AM
I got 3/10 though I read a similar article before.

I would choose a dozen other sans-serif fonts BEFORE I would even consider Helvetica.
mipadi
Sep 18 2008, 03:31 PM
QUOTE(gelionie @ Sep 18 2008, 04:40 AM)

I would choose a dozen other sans-serif fonts BEFORE I would even consider Helvetica.
But if you have to use Arial or Helvetica (as this site already does), Helvetica is clearly the better choice!
Tomates
Sep 18 2008, 03:53 PM
i think arial fits here better and to me its more neat.
karmakiller
Sep 18 2008, 07:58 PM
I don't think I'd notice much difference.

But if it was someone writing in small neon font, I probably wouldn't read the post. As long as no one does that, or types in a way like prince did... I don't care what font they use.
rnicron
Sep 19 2008, 03:33 PM
QUOTE(Tomates @ Sep 18 2008, 03:53 PM)

i think arial fits here better and to me its more neat.
you're kidding, right?
Activism
Sep 19 2008, 05:20 PM
Just use times new roman or helvetica
Joanne
Sep 19 2008, 06:49 PM
Times New Roman? I don't like serif fonts for forums... they're just too proper.
gelionie
Sep 20 2008, 01:18 AM
QUOTE(mipadi @ Sep 19 2008, 06:31 AM)

But if you have to use Arial or Helvetica (as this site already does), Helvetica is clearly the better choice!
True. Helvetica needs to be more 'widespread' though.
Us, PC users don't have much choice.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.