PrIncEoFSeXaPpeAL
Apr 9 2008, 07:12 AM
doughnut
Apr 9 2008, 07:53 AM
i dont see a problem with old threads, so why do you?
brooklyneast05
Apr 9 2008, 07:56 AM
nggoughosusiuhsh, i actually agree with you for once.
i don't mind older threads being bumped, but only if they are interesting. half the ones being bumped aren't. that's why they died a long time ago after 9 replies.
Just_Dream
Apr 9 2008, 12:38 PM
Well I think it's fine bumping old threads, especially if it means that it will prevent people from making duplicate topics. Of course, even if that happens, mods should
merge them anyways.
But yea let the uninteresting ones dieeeee.
illmortal
Apr 9 2008, 12:54 PM
WTF with ppl having two usernames and having conversations with themselves.
superstitious
Apr 9 2008, 01:52 PM
I usually don't mind bumped threads unless they are very dated. For example, if someone bumps a thread in which the topic starter is asking for time sensitive advice (ie: "What should I wear to prom?", when cleary the prom was over a year ago).
QUOTE(brooklyneast05 @ Apr 9 2008, 07:56 AM)

i don't mind older threads being bumped, but only if they are interesting. half the ones being bumped aren't. that's why they died a long time ago after 9 replies.
QUOTE(Just_Dream @ Apr 9 2008, 12:38 PM)

Well I think it's fine bumping old threads, especially if it means that it will prevent people from making duplicate topics. Of course, even if that happens, mods should
merge them anyways.
But yea let the uninteresting ones dieeeee.

Well, who is to say what is and isn't
interesting? ;) And I completely agree regarding merging threads. That's what I try to do, at least.
QUOTE(Tamacracker @ Apr 9 2008, 12:54 PM)

WTF with ppl having two usernames and having conversations with themselves.
What are you talking about? lol
PrIncEoFSeXaPpeAL
Apr 9 2008, 02:12 PM
QUOTE(Tamacracker @ Apr 9 2008, 01:54 PM)

WTF with ppl having two usernames and having conversations with themselves.

.... yupp yupp..
QUOTE(superstitious @ Apr 9 2008, 02:52 PM)

I usually don't mind bumped threads unless they are very dated. For example, if someone bumps a thread in which the topic starter is asking for time sensitive advice (ie: "What should I wear to prom?", when cleary the prom was over a year ago). Well, who is to say what is and isn't interesting? ;) And I completely agree regarding merging threads. That's what I try to do, at least.
What are you talking about? lol
ye dat shiet...

...
me c alott offf dat gayy shiett bumpinn likee dat noww..

...
2-3month finee.. butt fukin 1 yrr... h3ll naw..
illmortal
Apr 9 2008, 02:18 PM
QUOTE(superstitious @ Apr 9 2008, 02:52 PM)

What are you talking about? lol
I've already requested that you guys as moderators or/and administrators to do an IP check on this person... you guys have failed to do so and have yet to realize this guy uses two different usernames and both are active. Only thing I was told was, "he changed his username". Do an IP check and ban this troll.
I have another person who can agree with me, and if you read this thread, please do me a favor and bring this up to superstitious' attention.
superstitious
Apr 9 2008, 02:20 PM
QUOTE(Tamacracker @ Apr 9 2008, 02:18 PM)

I've already requested that you guys as moderators or/and administrators to do an IP check on this person... you guys have failed to do so and have yet to realize this guy uses two different usernames and both are active. Only thing I was told was, "he changed his username". Do an IP check and ban this troll.
I have another person who can agree with me, and if you read this thread, please do me a favor and bring this up to superstitious' attention.
=/ No need to be catty, young man. lol I don't randomly run IP checks on people, only if something has been brought up to my attention.
PrIncEoFSeXaPpeAL
Apr 9 2008, 02:21 PM
pandora
Apr 9 2008, 02:51 PM
I seem to remember doing IP Checks on him on several different occasion. Just because you have a hunch doesn't mean you should expose it or act on it, and it certainly doesnt mean that it's true. I suggest being a little less paranoid, and a little less interested in how other people choose to conduct themselves, and a little more interested in the way you conduct yourself.
illmortal
Apr 9 2008, 02:53 PM
QUOTE(pandora @ Apr 9 2008, 03:51 PM)

I seem to remember doing IP Checks on him on several different occasion. Just because you have a hunch doesn't mean you should expose it or act on it, and it certainly doesnt mean that it's true. I suggest being a little less paranoid, and a little less interested in how other people choose to conduct themselves, and a little more interested in the way you conduct yourself.
That's funny... people's trackers are showing he's on two different usernames with the same IP address... and this was coming from someone reputable.
Why don't you do your job as a mod and investigate instead of havin this troll annoy us with stupidity. And again disregarding my request.
Be-Faithful
Apr 9 2008, 03:03 PM

omg
PrIncEoFSeXaPpeAL
Apr 9 2008, 03:04 PM
QUOTE(PrIncEoFSeXaPpeAL @ Apr 9 2008, 03:21 PM)

uhh ye... 2 samee ipp addrezzz... riiiteee tamaa....
lett stopp spamin plzz...
P.S ppll allowww 2 chaangee usurrnam tamaa...
brooklyneast05
Apr 9 2008, 03:08 PM
QUOTE(Tamacracker @ Apr 9 2008, 02:53 PM)

Why don't you do your job as a mod and investigate instead of havin this troll annoy us with stupidity. And again disregarding my request.
QUOTE(pandora @ Apr 9 2008, 02:51 PM)

I seem to remember doing IP Checks on him on several different occasion.
illmortal
Apr 9 2008, 03:11 PM
Do it again. If he didn't have such annoying usernames I'd post which ones belong to him. But of course his usernames look like the shit stuck on the bottom of his shoes.
PrIncEoFSeXaPpeAL
Apr 9 2008, 03:14 PM
dam.. HAHAHA... bunchaa hate yoo

lit talkk boutt my topicc plz.. noo mo spamm plz..
brooklyneast05
Apr 9 2008, 03:16 PM
get over it, you spam everyone else's topics.
PrIncEoFSeXaPpeAL
Apr 9 2008, 03:17 PM

git bak topicc plz..
pandora
Apr 9 2008, 03:20 PM
Last time I checked, IP Addresses don't get "identified" based on createblog accounts when using the tracker.
paperplane
Apr 9 2008, 03:21 PM
QUOTE(Tamacracker @ Apr 9 2008, 04:11 PM)

Do it again. If he didn't have such annoying usernames I'd post which ones belong to him. But of course his usernames look like the shit stuck on the bottom of his shoes.
Copy and paste.
brooklyneast05
Apr 9 2008, 03:21 PM
pandora
Apr 9 2008, 03:22 PM
Also two people can't claim/identify one IP using the tracker.
Be-Faithful
Apr 9 2008, 03:37 PM
comon miss Nudepiqs just try to get the real B-NOX's IP
libertie
Apr 9 2008, 04:34 PM
You guys are forgetting that Trish is not an admin anymore.
I'll gladly disable this person's account if he's a duplicate, but I'd prefer it if I had solid evidence to go off of.
That having been said, I'm not ignoring this. I'll keep looking into it, and I'd appreciate it if someone, I don't care which of you does it, would let me know what it is you know that I don't. ;)
Tung
Apr 9 2008, 05:10 PM
Hmm, this is quite interesting.
Lemme just say, the "evidence" of the tracker is now gone, and can't be shown to "prove" that they are the same people because after the crash this morning, all tracker logs have reseted and isn't there anymore.
Although it would impossible to match IPs if say one account used the real ISP, and the other accounts goes on a proxy.
illmortal
Apr 9 2008, 05:30 PM
QUOTE(libertie @ Apr 9 2008, 05:34 PM)

You guys are forgetting that Trish is not an admin anymore.
I'll gladly disable this person's account if he's a duplicate, but I'd prefer it if I had solid evidence to go off of.
That having been said, I'm not ignoring this. I'll keep looking into it, and I'd appreciate it if someone, I don't care which of you does it, would let me know what it is you know that I don't. ;)
Toung... rhymes with Toung

erm.. nvm, he's posted :P
Tung
Apr 9 2008, 05:33 PM
^

what are you talking about.
The-March-Hare
Apr 9 2008, 05:34 PM
Whatever he's talking about, if it isn't related to the topic of this thread, take it somewhere else, please. There are plenty of places for chit-chat, and this thread is not one of them.
illmortal
Apr 9 2008, 05:36 PM
QUOTE(The-March-Hare @ Apr 9 2008, 06:34 PM)

Whatever he's talking about, if it isn't related to the topic of this thread, take it somewhere else, please. There are plenty of places for chit-chat, and this thread is not one of them.
Get off the high horse, someone demote this bish!
Jk
Tung... nothin I was just bein silly lol
Tung
Apr 9 2008, 05:40 PM
I hate to agree but chill the f**k down James lol. As much as I appreciate the modding, you've been only people staff for just less than a week. You still get the probie treatment.

Oh alright. Haha. I was like confused.
pandora
Apr 9 2008, 05:43 PM
So on one hand you criticize the mods because they don't do enough, or don't act quickly enough, or are too lenient, but then i guess that only applies if it doesnt directly effect you, right Tama?
aaayotiffany
Apr 9 2008, 05:43 PM
i like old threads.

well, some of them. some are pretty interesting and worth posting in. however, the ones that are boring and uninteresting needs to stay in the past.
karmakiller
Apr 9 2008, 06:00 PM
Well, it's always good to search before you make a topic. But if the last post in that topic was made one or two years ago, just go ahead and make the topic. People that don't check dates on the posts are going to end up quoting and replying to people that aren't here anymore. Plus, after the whole thing this summer, there's lots of accounts who info stuff on the left doesn't show up, because their account got deleted.
illmortal
Apr 9 2008, 06:01 PM
QUOTE(pandora @ Apr 9 2008, 06:43 PM)

So on one hand you criticize the mods because they don't do enough, or don't act quickly enough, or are too lenient, but then i guess that only applies if it doesnt directly effect you, right Tama?
This thread shouldn't even exist... just like the person who created this thread, Pandora.
And libertie, thank you for standing up and taking the time to look into it. I appreciate it
pandora
Apr 9 2008, 06:04 PM
As if it wasn't already looked into before? Believe me there were a number of times this issue was brought up backstage.
superstitious
Apr 9 2008, 06:36 PM
QUOTE(Tamacracker @ Apr 9 2008, 06:01 PM)

This thread shouldn't even exist... just like the person who created this thread, Pandora.
And libertie, thank you for standing up and taking the time to look into it. I appreciate it

We ALL have looked into it, including Pandora.
Here's the thing, if you are wanting to help, if you are really wanting to rid this forum of the multiple account using perp, why not help us help you? lol If you have something solid, share it. If not, well, :[
SOOOO, about bumping topics.
QUOTE(superstitious @ Apr 9 2008, 01:52 PM)

I usually don't mind bumped threads unless they are very dated. For example, if someone bumps a thread in which the topic starter is asking for time sensitive advice (ie: "What should I wear to prom?", when cleary the prom was over a year ago).
QUOTE(brooklyneast05 @ Apr 9 2008, 07:56 AM)

i don't mind older threads being bumped, but only if they are interesting. half the ones being bumped aren't. that's why they died a long time ago after 9 replies.
QUOTE(Just_Dream @ Apr 9 2008, 12:38 PM)

Well I think it's fine bumping old threads, especially if it means that it will prevent people from making duplicate topics. Of course, even if that happens, mods should
merge them anyways.
But yea let the uninteresting ones dieeeee.

Well, who is to say what is and isn't
interesting? ;) And I completely agree regarding merging threads. That's what I try to do, at least.
brooklyneast05
Apr 9 2008, 06:37 PM
QUOTE(superstitious @ Apr 9 2008, 01:52 PM)

Well, who is to say what is and isn't interesting? ;)
christina and i, that's who.
pandora
Apr 9 2008, 07:06 PM
well if it's a topic that's like "lulz i went to the mall yesterday and there was this guy." and the topic is dated in 2004...
leave it in the past, guys.
Just_Dream
Apr 9 2008, 07:19 PM
QUOTE(brooklyneast05 @ Apr 9 2008, 04:37 PM)

christina and i, that's who.
Yea you tell her!
The uninteresting ones like this:
Kinoko no Yamalol yes that topic should've died, but Tung just had to bump it.

It's making me seem
Asian Mongolian.
EDIT - Tamacracker, it's the SAME PERSON. Trust me. Look at his old posts. If you ever noticed his posts around, you'd know that his old ones (OMG AND THEY ARE COHERENT TOO!) are the same as the ones from before he changed his username. Go to one of his really old topics (i.e. staring problem)
look at this post:
IT SAYS HIS NAME HEREBut look at the original topic creator. DUH. Seriously, no offense to the moderators, but man I can't believe that I HAD to be the one to prove this. Makes me feel crappy because I'm actually defending nguoiconcacbede. EWWW. But seriously, no more arguing about this. It's just a lost cause already.
pandora
Apr 9 2008, 07:53 PM
Lol you didn't "HAVE" to do anything, just like the mods didnt.
Tung
Apr 9 2008, 07:59 PM
I think you fail to understand what Tama is accusing here Christina. He's accusing that Nguoicasison and B-Nox are the same person. And that this person made these accounts and are having conversations with themselves. I think everyone knows that princeofsexappeal and nguoicasison are the same person (account).
And wow. I just clicked that link, and it's amazing how well he use to type back then. Which was just 4-5 months ago.
Just_Dream
Apr 9 2008, 08:06 PM
QUOTE(Tungster @ Apr 9 2008, 05:59 PM)

I think you fail to understand what Tama is accusing here Christina. He's accusing that Nguoicasison and B-Nox are the same person. And that this person made these accounts and are having conversations with themselves. I think everyone knows that princeofsexappeal and nguoicasison are the same person (account).
Oh okay, whoops sorry my bad then. I thought he thought princeofsexappeal was a different person.
PrIncEoFSeXaPpeAL
Apr 9 2008, 08:32 PM
yee tama.. go finee summ me IP or sumthang.. buttt waiit.. u cantt finee shiet.. soo guezz u gittaa.. zZz ZZ ZZz Zz ZTFU!!!..
NOWW BAKK topiccc ppl...
ppll whoo bummpp gayy shiett bak git warnningg!!!.. iff thee threadd 2-3 month oldd... bumpp finee.. iff threadd 4-5 oldd.. u bumpp u gitt wanringg!!!
usee u damm searchhh thangg nub...
DAM... sum1 giv mee MEMBAA STAFFFF fukinn dam it!! me putt diz bietchezz inn chek.!!
QUOTE(PrIncEoFSeXaPpeAL @ Apr 9 2008, 03:21 PM)

^
^
^ EY TAMA...
QUOTE(The-March-Hare @ Apr 9 2008, 06:34 PM)

Whatever he's talking about, if it isn't related to the topic of this thread, take it somewhere else, please. There are plenty of places for chit-chat, and this thread is not one of them.
goodd goodd kid.. dat rite kidd.. doo u job..
Markster
Apr 9 2008, 08:33 PM
Nguoi, you never reminded me to blast your head off with my friend's gun.
PrIncEoFSeXaPpeAL
Apr 9 2008, 08:34 PM
BAK topicc stopp spaminn bietchh..

com on ppl.. me trydaa haveee cerreall tallk hur.. GIT BAK TOPICC!!
ppll whoo bummpp threaddd 4-5 monthh oldd.. u gitt warnninn!!! whoo downn withh dat...? cuz dat shiett makee dizz forumm g@y..

me trydaa makee dizz placee funn hurr..
Tung
Apr 9 2008, 08:40 PM
Is our deal still on Nguoi? For one month?
Deetard
Apr 9 2008, 08:41 PM
It's got to take forever to type like that.
Elba
Apr 9 2008, 08:45 PM
whatchuu takllin bout spennceeeeeee? hoooooooooooooooooow do yyou fiigurree ittt hhass to takkkee forevahh to typeee like dddissss?? hHUUUH??? GTFOOOOOOOO of myffaceeeeeeeeeeeeee
PrIncEoFSeXaPpeAL
Apr 9 2008, 08:48 PM
oh yee.. mee teelll u wat ADMMINN/MODD.. wen ppll bummpp oldd@sss threaddd.. justt closee da shiett orr deleetee... sounddd gooodd..?
QUOTE(Tungster @ Apr 9 2008, 09:40 PM)

Is our deal still on Nguoi? For one month?
mee ginnaa go alll dat 4 nuttin mangg.. cuz u justt ginnaa sayy no... blah mangg..

... u gitttaa giv r showww mee sumthangg soo mee beleiiev ya mangg..

QUOTE(Spencer @ Apr 9 2008, 09:41 PM)

It's got to take forever to type like that.
nah.. u aintt jaamaicaa so u aintt sickk likee moi..
GTFOO myy facee..
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.