LOL I'd recommend you do a lil more studying before firing back at me with your "dipshit" comment. Now you look like a bigger dipshit. Alpha-Dipshit.

Why was it moved back? Tung asked for it to be moved to Debate.

It's not even a debate... these are just personal point of views.

Want to explain how Vietnamese people are classified as Mongolians then?

yeah i'd like to know as well.

and i'd like to go on record as stating that PROCREATION is not the same thing as EVOLUTION.


edit://



I have to do this.

He's the topic author, not you. Unless you decide that you can request whatever it is you want with other people's threads, since you've been known to do that before.

And I don't see how this is any less of a debate than some of the other topics we have in Debate, other than you not liking the topic.

Vietnam is a multi ethnic country in which consists of 68 million Vietnamese of Mongoloid race.

-.-

Don't f**k with my historical knowledge boy... read the last line in my signature.


Right.

^ this is why people get confused with race and ethnicity.

there's a difference between the mongoloid race and what is now the mongolian ethnic group. it was thomas henry huxley who gave distinct names in the "four races", which some people don't even consider anymore.

edited: forgot huxley's first & middle name for a second ;x

Oh true... I stick to origins. Stupid people should go kill themselves for ruining life and historical knowledge.

ps. Prediction!!! A hound dog will quote me and tell me to go kill myself.

pss. lets get back on topic =\

Historical knowledge? All you did was google this shit and did a quick 10 minute research on Vietnam.

[quote Vietnam is a multi-ethnic country with its main population of 68 millions of Vietnamese of Mongoloid race. There are also 15 millions of aborigines grouping some 53 ethnic minorities. The composition of ethnic minorities is as follows : the Muong, Tho, Chut (of Viet-Muong language), the Tay, Nung, Thai, Cao Lan, San Chi, Lao, Puna (of Tay-Thai language), the Hmong, Dao, Pathen, Tông (of Hmong-Dao language), the Lolo, La Hu, Cong, Phu La, Si La (of Tibeto-Burman language),the Bahnar, Kmer, Sedang, Mnong, Maa, Sre, Katu, Khmu, Hre (of Mon-Khmer language), the Jarai, Ede, Cham, churu, Rhade (of Austronesian language), the Co Lao, La Chi, Pu Peo, La ha (of various languages of the Austroasiatic family), etc.[\quote]

http://www.honque.com/HQ020/bKhao_tqHai.htm

And I agree with Trish on that one. I like to see you answer her on that one.

Sorry I agree...It's not such a big deal. The sex part that is. But if you want to wait until marriage because you want more meaning then go ahead. But sex in general is not that big as people tend it to be.

That's not exactly the site (music site... wtf???) I went to, but ok. Can you prove that it's wrong?...

why are we talking about race in a topic about premarital sex? this is completely off topic.

i could understand tamacracker's point of view. he basically thinks like my grandparents.

so any "debate" going on between him and the rest of us is purely difference in opinion between "american individualism" and his traditionalist closed mindedness.

tamacracker, though i do believe that sex was once perceived as only for procreation, you're making it seem like we've evolved into sex-crazed animals (although for some of us i guess that'd be true, har har har). i personally disagree with your standpoint, but i do respect you a teeny bit more that you appear to stand behind your old-school beliefs. there aren't that many people i know who still think that way.



'cause he digressed into the issue of morality and its corellation with race. then he called christina mongolian. so yah ;o.

First off, you just admitted that your knowledge of the subject goes as far as a Google search. That being said, I have no idea where you get such conviction in the statement from.

And what kinda question is that?




You know Tamacracker, after all the other times you've gotten pwnd for being a self-righteous prick, I'd have thought you had learned that being an all-knowing close-minded contrary to everything someone says on CB just doesn't work.

And for all the crap you whip up about CB's general lack of decency, and manners, you sure as hell have a funny way of debating.

/offtopic

Movies, radio, tv shows, music of nearly any genre. Nuff said.

Not many people respect others for their views.. specially when they seem like they're the same as their parents or even grandparents. But oh well... it's their lives and their problems.. not mine.




You do realize... cross referencing anything on google is the proper way to research right?... You do multiple of searches and try to prove the authenticity of it. Vietnam Census people... C'MON!!! And that's nothin... I'm just speakin about current day population.



LOL I don't give a shit about what you think or anyone else thinks to be quite frank. You're just another human being... nothin special to me nor anyone else in this forum. So you can take my word for it or not.. I don't give a daaaamn. lol




Yeah normally it's like playin chess you see... I read their moves and either play along with them or just drop it because at the end of it all.. it's some how gonna become a flame war. Like it normally becomes at the end -,-

delete this post -,- im goin home!

rofl "knowledge" does not mean "ability to google."

Cross referencing comes into the picture when you have background knowledge of the subject, and reliable sources. Start coughing up scholarly essays, cross reference those, and then we'll talk.



I'm not even sure about what you're referring to. I said that your style on the board just isn't going to fly.

Read. Comprehend. THEN respond.



Which once again, is because of the rude and crass way you choose to debate.

'K, and I'm sure many debaters would appreciate it if you stayed there.

Okay seriously, I'm NOT going to get in a debate about "past" aka "historical" references. No offense, queen.

And I'm not a wannabe Asian. You don't know anything about me, so how about you stop assuming. I'm done anyway, as I am not the one that went on a tangent about "childbirth" and "race". Actually the rate thing started with him calling Tung Americanized and so on.

Or you could use DNA to prove who's origin is from where/who. For example did you know Genghis Khan's Y chromosomes are in millions of men around the world?... Yep.

But let me ask you, what resources do you have that shows that Vietnamese in no way, shape or form have any relations with Mongolians. If you don't mind me asking.

PM me if you can... I'll leave thread so it gets back on topic.


Ok
But I don't even think we were debating. It's nonsense to debate it. It's just personal view...








Yeah I kinda figured that one out a while ago pandora -,-

how is she a wannabe asian when shes actually... asian?

None at all. Why? Because I haven't researched it, which is why I've refrained from taking either side. I like to get my shit straight before saying anything.



Once again, I'm at a loss as to what you're referring to. If you're talking about the thread topic, then you're right, it is personal view. A debate of people's personal views on the subject.

If you're talking about my analysis of your behavioral success on the board, then no, it wasn't a debate. It was a concrete conclusion drawn from all your past failed arguments on CB, and the manner in which they were delivered.

Understood. Just to let you know, the reason I definitely tried not to debate this was because it wasn't in the debate forum in the first place.

back on topic please, everyone.

Tama not to go against you and your morals because I agree you have made good points. But isn't one of the BIGGEST sins in Islam JUDGING others?

damn.

But different people find different things wrong. If one person decides that someone else is doing something wrong. That's basically judging. No matter what it is.

Not saying you're a bad person though. I mean even I at this moment am judging by saying you're judging.

Take it to PM. And quote what I judged.

No no no, I'm not starting an argument lol. I'm just putting up what I think that's all.

Mind Closed.

-.- I'm not trying to start an argument, I'm askin you where did I judge...

I believe if you see someone stealing, you can simply call them a thief. That's judging right? Right... but because it's obvious they're stealing it's not wrong to judge them as a thief.

Anyways, I'll leave the thread in peace.

What if they're stealing for the good?

On a lighter note: Sex is good. I wish you all best of luck in all of your sexual adventures.

^^
Good, now seriously lets stay on topic, this is getting ridiculous.



Sooo, back to topic -- I think its funny how America is so 'sex-crazed' apparently but at the same time so sexually repressed compared to some places in Europe and whatnot hm?

but like I said earlier, to each his own as long as you don't shove it down ones throat. Seriously.

Can you please quote the part where I started to shove my opinion down anyone's throat in this thread? NO WHERE did I mention this is how we as humans HAVE to live. I simply implied what the point of sex was in the first place. Nothin more nothing less... I didn't judge anyone for different way of life nor did I tell them that I'm better than them because of their choices with sex.


So quote me. Obviously sulfur failed at quoting me on my so called "judging", poor kid doesn't even know what judging is.

i dont think she was necessarily even talking to you specifically. slow your roll and stop instigating shit.

I'm quoting you now.

Instead of singling someone out because you don't take the time to read the thread, why don't you take a step back and realize how narcissistic you are on the forum. Just because you're in a thread, and there's a dispute, doesn't mean it's directed toward you. Get the f**k outta here with that bullshit.

And with all the assumptions after my first post in this thread by Just Dream, superstitious, and tungmyBANANA, you're gonna tell me that someone's not gonna agree with them (most likey dislike me) and add with no names an agreement with the others by mentioning, "shoving opinions down others throats?... I can tell what they're implying... you can take a look at the rest of the thread and you'll see no one's shoving anything down anyone's throat. Until the moronic assumptions began.

Right...

She was responding to the opening post. This board and the posts made on it do not revolve around you. Steph rarely gets involved with forum drama.

Actually she's taking my opinion of America's "sex craze" and agreeing with superstitious' "sex repression" compared to Europe... nothin to do with the first post of the thread actually.

Anyways I'm outs.

Just because she's agreeing with what other people have said does not mean that she is in any way responding to anything you've said.

Oh for christs stake Tama whatever. Trish makes a good point, I don't hate the drama here but I don't feel the need to get involved. Honest to god, why do you think it all revolves around you? You really aren't that important, especially not to me. I was trying to get back on topic and just stating a fact I noticed about America and Europe. Notice I said America is BOTH sex-crazed and repressed somehow? Although people, NOT JUST YOU, view America as more sex-crazed than some places in Europe AND other parts of the world.


And actually dude...the 'shove it down ones throat' was a general statement and I meant more so in a way - as long as no one tries to shove their opinion down ANYONE's, NOT JUST YOU.


Jeezuz. Just calm the eff down, and lets all get over this cause this is getting really ridiculous.

K

i agree.
just use a condom.

your sig is too big.

LMAO O RLY?

NO WAIIIIII. Wouldn't that be premarital sex? Make sure you have babies, okay?