Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: i get a new camera so help meeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
Forums > Community Center > Technology
$$$ soul
Specifics:

- Around $250, DEFINITELY under $300
- Around 7.2 mp
- REALLY slim

I was thinking about the Canon SD1000 cause it's just a good camera in general but I really really like the slimness of the Casio EX-S770:





But I heard the Casio takes bad pictures and is blurry most of the time. So, what's a good camera? If I plan to get a Canon, I'm aiming towards the Canon S and SD series. Anything good that takes nice pics, won't break easily, and is slim will be good. Recommend!
tr1pp1n
why under 250? you have 50 dollars you're saving for what?

Don't get caught up on the megapixels. Canon has a great array of functions for the money and I'd overlook the casios megapixel crap because casios are made like trash anyways

hey i say that you get a canon sd1000 best bang for buck and use the left over money at the petting zoo
$$$ soul
TRIPPIN i like the petting zoo thxxxxxxxxx
tr1pp1n
casios are cheap and for people who like blurry pictres


thanks dont argue with me check sig
$$$ soul
My sig isn't interested.
HakunaMatata
Do you mind if I ask why 7.2 MP? Unless you plan on using it to print huge, huge pictures, I don't see why. :/

The Kodak V803 looks rather nifty. _smile.gif
tr1pp1n
best friend has a v1000 or whatever th3 black kodak and hates it so much he'd give it to me if i asked
$$$ soul
KODAK SUCKS

QUOTE(HakunaMatata @ Jul 12 2007, 07:25 PM) *
Do you mind if I ask why 7.2 MP? Unless you plan on using it to print huge, huge pictures, I don't see why. :/

The Kodak V803 looks rather nifty. _smile.gif

No reason really, I just like to get the most out of crisp clear pics. I have a 4 mp camera and the pictures look kind of bland.
pandamonium
those are both good. but slimmer is exilim and i loved mine until i upgraded. but the edges to that canon i can imagine being chipped away.

i like exilim better.
$$$ soul
QUOTE(pandamonium @ Jul 12 2007, 10:21 PM) *
those are both good. but slimmer is exilim and i loved mine until i upgraded. but the edges to that canon i can imagine being chipped away.

i like exilim better.

Was it blurry when you took pics? How did it adjust to the dark?
pandamonium
it was my first digital when i had my exilim. it was only 2mps and it wasnt that great. my friend has a 5 mp and she loved it. but her lens broke when her friend pressed it in.

the pictures werent blurry when she took them. but if you wanna see how much the lag time is in taking the pictures go look online like bestbuy.com . it depends on the focus light. if you are taking pictures in the night the camera usually sends a light to focus in on the subject(s).

usually there is a night time setting with cameras.
$$$ soul
2 MP? Wow that's like...a phone camera.
ladiesman217
My cellphone has a 2 mexapixel camera and it transforms
and takes great pics
$$$ soul
Go away or I'll transform you into a ho.
fire


It also has a large palate range of colours.
ladiesman217

THEN YOU CAN MEET THE AUTOBOTS
$$$ soul
QUOTE(fire @ Jul 12 2007, 11:54 PM) *


It also has a large palate range of colours.

WOWOWOW HOOK ME UP
Simba
Don't get caught up on the megapixels.
MyMichelle
GET THE CANON!

I used to have a Casio 5.0 mp, and it was worse than my 3.2 mp Canon (me, completely ignoring what Arjuna just said, haha) but seriously. Canon's cameras are great. Worth the money. Have way more fun color functions than most. :]
Simba
QUOTE(MyMichelle @ Jul 14 2007, 01:26 AM) *
GET THE CANON!

I used to have a Casio 5.0 mp, and it was worse than my 3.2 mp Canon (me, completely ignoring what Arjuna just said, haha) but seriously. Canon's cameras are great. Worth the money. Have way more fun color functions than most. :]
Ha ha, nah, that was my point. The Casio had more megapixels, but the Canon still performed better.
tr1pp1n
QUOTE(tr1pp1n @ Jul 12 2007, 06:58 PM) *
....Don't get caught up on the megapixels. Canon has a great array of functions for the money....

I TOLD YOU SO! EVEN BEFORE ARJUNA
$$$ soul
QUOTE(tr1pp1n @ Jul 14 2007, 07:36 AM) *
I TOLD YOU SO! EVEN BEFORE ARJUNA

Nice edit in yur posts.

Ok, but I don't want the SD1000 cause the edges will get scratched off easily. I was aiming more towards the SD850 or SD800 but they are like $350...
MyMichelle
Just get ANY 5.0mp+ camera. You'll be able to find them for like 200-300. They might be more chunky looking, but they are still worth it. Plus the chunky ones are probably more rugged. ^_^"


WHATEVER YOU DO, DO NOT GET THE CASIO!!!


:]
tr1pp1n
QUOTE($$$ soul @ Jul 14 2007, 12:26 PM) *
Nice edit in yur posts.

Ok, but I don't want the SD1000 cause the edges will get scratched off easily. I was aiming more towards the SD850 or SD800 but they are like $350...

I didn't edit. go die
MyMichelle
QUOTE($$ soul @ Jul 14 2007, 02:26 PM) *
Nice edit in yur posts.

Ok, but I don't want the SD1000 cause the edges will get scratched off easily. I was aiming more towards the SD850 or SD800 but they are like $350...


...scratched off easily?! haha. They have many different ones. ^_^" I used to have a very rectangular one, and the edges never "scratched off." No worries.
$$$ soul
Well, I actually got to hold the SD1000 and SD800 IS in person today. They are nice sizes but I hate how the IS cameras are soooooo expensiveeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee.
$$$ soul
I saw a Pentax next to the Casio Exilim at a store yesterday. I think I'll still stick with Canon.
tr1pp1n
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx...N82E16830241011


HOW ABOUT A " VIVIVIVITAR"
$$$ soul
QUOTE($ soul @ Jul 15 2007, 01:00 PM) *
I think I'll still stick with Canon.

QUOTE($ soul @ Jul 15 2007, 01:00 PM) *
I think I'll still stick with Canon.

QUOTE($ soul @ Jul 15 2007, 01:00 PM) *
I think I'll still stick with Canon.

QUOTE($ soul @ Jul 15 2007, 01:00 PM) *
I think I'll still stick with Canon.

QUOTE($ soul @ Jul 15 2007, 01:00 PM) *
I think I'll still stick with Canon.

QUOTE($ soul @ Jul 15 2007, 01:00 PM) *
I think I'll still stick with Canon.

QUOTE($ soul @ Jul 15 2007, 01:00 PM) *
I think I'll still stick with Canon.

QUOTE($ soul @ Jul 15 2007, 01:00 PM) *
I think I'll still stick with Canon.


READ BISHHHhh
tr1pp1n
maybe you should get the
A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550 A550
tr1pp1n
little shit
$$$ soul
A550 is ugly and bulky and I already have the A520.
MyMichelle
QUOTE($$ soul @ Jul 15 2007, 04:23 PM) *
READ BISHHHhh


Yay. Canon rules. Seriously. I have loved every single Canon that I have had. :]
tr1pp1n
That doesn't change the fact that alexia is a bitchass ho
$$$ soul
You spelled my name wrong, EdDIE.
$$$ soul
QUOTE(tr1pp1n @ Jul 17 2007, 09:32 PM) *
That doesn't change the fact that alexia is a bitchass ho

UM...nice edit
popoberry
get the canon .
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.