HakunaMatata
Feb 6 2007, 09:18 PM
The Moderator Performance thread isn't exactly the place for dicussion of the CBC, yes? Please continue all discussion as such here.
tininja
Feb 6 2007, 09:20 PM
I don't see a point in having this topic now. The owner of the chat already took off everyone on op, and isn't banning anyone or anything. I don't see a problem unless some other bot comes in..
Intercourse.
Feb 6 2007, 10:36 PM
^THEN SAY THEM
annonymous.
Feb 7 2007, 12:18 AM
There is no need for another topic about CBC. There is already one in the lounge. I'm sure this can be closed.
Link:
Click!
HakunaMatata
Feb 7 2007, 12:40 AM
This topic is based more along the lines of the moderation of the CBC and it's relationship with CB. The other is more based on the goings-on in the CBC.
But if another mod feels this is unnecessary, then close if you will.
Monochrome.
Feb 7 2007, 07:10 AM
so i was wondering about this IRC chat you all had before
why didnt that work out?
I Shot JFK
Feb 7 2007, 07:19 AM
^ Well really it was because the AIM chat was already established, and not many people moved from one to the other, and also because there was some difficulty in that people didnt have an IRC client, or what have you, so it never really took off... which was a shame... I miss playing trivia
doughnut
Feb 7 2007, 07:20 AM
I hate the chat bots
annonymous.
Feb 7 2007, 07:23 PM
QUOTE(kayceeisms @ Feb 6 2007, 9:40 PM)

This topic is based more along the lines of the moderation of the CBC and it's relationship with CB. The other is more based on the goings-on in the CBC.
But if another mod feels this is unnecessary, then close if you will.
Actually, I'm pretty sure that the topic in the lounge can be used to talk about the moderation. I'm sure that the topic in the lounge talks about moderation, as well as other things related to CBC. I think that there should just be one topic, and I don't get why this is in feedback. How does it really relate to cB? How does it give suggestions? If you guys are going to keep this topic, at least move it into some place where it's appropriately suppose to be.
WHIMSICAL 0NE
Feb 7 2007, 07:37 PM
Not really about the moderation of the chat, but I'm going to say it anyways: I think that AOL should let it's users into AIM chat rooms. After all, they are run by the same dang company. I don't go into the chat because I don't have AIM and it takes too long to download on my computer. That's why I don't know a lot of people here.
Monochrome.
Feb 7 2007, 09:21 PM
QUOTE
Actually, I'm pretty sure that the topic in the lounge can be used to talk about the moderation. I'm sure that the topic in the lounge talks about moderation, as well as other things related to CBC. I think that there should just be one topic, and I don't get why this is in feedback. How does it really relate to cB? How does it give suggestions? If you guys are going to keep this topic, at least move it into some place where it's appropriately suppose to be.
I might be wrong but i belive this realates to cB as its becoming a growing issue with certain members.The "oping" of people has caused unessesary drama as people where being banned or "kicked" out of chats for no reason or jsut for the hell of it I think this needs to be brought to light because it is a really popular feature on CreateBlog.
So there needs to be some ideas shared with the community on how we can get rid of the drama and certain other issues that occur in chat. as for the topic in the lounge i noticed it more of a less became a rant about how cB chat sucks now...or cB chat was good in the old days..[no one cares]So i think this fits nicely in here. but i might be wrong..lol
oXMuhNirvanaXo
Feb 7 2007, 09:43 PM
We all have delt with this before. All we can really do about all these stupid bots is just for get about them and go to a new chat that we make. No big problem there.
:-)
annonymous.
Feb 8 2007, 11:08 PM
QUOTE(Monochrome. @ Feb 7 2007, 6:21 PM)

I might be wrong but i belive this realates to cB as its becoming a growing issue with certain members.The "oping" of people has caused unessesary drama as people where being banned or "kicked" out of chats for no reason or jsut for the hell of it I think this needs to be brought to light because it is a really popular feature on CreateBlog.
So there needs to be some ideas shared with the community on how we can get rid of the drama and certain other issues that occur in chat. as for the topic in the lounge i noticed it more of a less became a rant about how cB chat sucks now...or cB chat was good in the old days..[no one cares]So i think this fits nicely in here. but i might be wrong..lol

I still think that it would be better to just have ONE topic on CBC. I still think this should be closed, and the one in the lounge should be kept. I don't see why you need to have 2 topics on 1 thing. Waste of space.

How is this feedback anyways? It doesn't even really talk about CB as a forum. It just talks about the chat.
I think the one in the lounge is mainly about CBC, and I think it should be kept. I don't get how it fits in the feedback forum.....

If anyone would like to give me information on HOW it fits in the feedback forum, please post here.
clarity
Feb 10 2007, 07:25 PM
I'm a bit confused, can someone explain this "op" buisness and all?
and the bot stuff?
i'm sooo confused.
Libertie
Feb 12 2007, 02:46 AM
So why exactly does our chatroom have an owner now? I'm still a bit confused and annoyed over all this.
Monochrome.
Feb 12 2007, 02:57 AM
^i honestly didnt knopw that aim chats had owners i thought it was jsut a random link we had on here.
this is all a pain in the butt.
doughnut
Feb 12 2007, 07:25 AM
QUOTE(Libertie @ Feb 12 2007, 3:46 PM)

So why exactly does our chatroom have an owner now? I'm still a bit confused and annoyed over all this.
I agree.
Stefanny
Feb 12 2007, 02:53 PM
QUOTE(Libertie @ Feb 11 2007, 11:46 PM)

So why exactly does our chatroom have an owner now? I'm still a bit confused and annoyed over all this.
Pretty much, Josh(Elated iPod) came in and "planted" his take-over bot(ipudz0r) when nobody else was in the chat. Obviously, Josh couldn't overlook and control the chatroom all the time, so he gave 3 CBC guys (Rik, Jerome, and KC) the "powers" to moderate the room. They were allowed to kick, ban, and op(hand over powers) people who came into the CBC room. Obviously, they abused their powers, because, who wouldn't? Eventually, Josh had about 11 ops, and took off all of them except for Arjuna, Dani, and KC. Why? Probably because most(if not all) CB members respect these three.
Anyways, point is, the chat should be fine with the whole moderation thing from now on, except for the bot randomly kicking/banning people out for no reason...(don't ask)
I hope that sums things up with the whole "cbc owner" thing.
So, what
does happen in the CBC, most of the time? Perverted talk or member bashing that I personally don't even want to mention or go on about.
Libertie
Feb 12 2007, 06:56 PM
QUOTE
Obviously, Josh couldn't overlook and control the chatroom all the time
Okay, this is what confuses me. Why do we NEED someone to overlook and control the chatroom all the time? The chat has always held itself up and we've had no problems with this.
Stefanny
Feb 12 2007, 08:18 PM
QUOTE(Libertie @ Feb 12 2007, 3:56 PM)

Okay, this is what confuses me. Why do we NEED someone to overlook and control the chatroom all the time? The chat has always held itself up and we've had no problems with this.
We don't. My theory is that all he wanted to do was control the chat.

Hey, I'm not saying Josh is a bad guy and that he abuses his "chat ruling powers," though.
I say, ignore the whole bot thing because it really doesn't make a difference in the chat, that's what we've been doing for the past few days in CBC.
Monochrome.
Feb 12 2007, 08:27 PM
QUOTE
So, what does happen in the CBC, most of the time? Perverted talk or member bashing that I personally don't even want to mention or go on about.
CBC is a drama starting cesspool in which i have a addiction to looking at.its like a soap opera in the making.
i honestly dont think that the chat needs anytype of moderation but if you have to have a moderator that it should be up to only one person and that should only be josh [elated ipod] himself.
and even if he cant be in the chat all the time i dont see what was the issue beforehand when he wasnt in the chat. most people didnt even know that he was the owner of the chat untill recently so why all the sudden changes?
I Shot JFK
Feb 12 2007, 08:53 PM
QUOTE
i honestly dont think that the chat needs anytype of moderation but if you have to have a moderator that it should be up to only one person and that should only be josh [elated ipod] himself.
Wait, so who is Josh, and why should he be in charge of CBC over anybody else?
And why do we need a CBC mod in the first place? This whole thing is just weird, to be honest.
Monochrome.
Feb 12 2007, 09:04 PM
QUOTE(I Shot JFK @ Feb 13 2007, 1:53 AM)

Wait, so who is Josh, and why should he be in charge of CBC over anybody else?
And why do we need a CBC mod in the first place? This whole thing is just weird, to be honest.
Josh is elated ipod on AIM.
and thats the whole point of this disscussion as to why there is a sudden need for the chat to be moderated.
ArjunaCapulong
Feb 12 2007, 09:09 PM
If I'm not mistaken, Josh is doing this because he's bored, and he can.
He gave a direct answer somewhere in a past thread where it was brought up, I just can't quite remember where.
The whole thing has definitely brought some novel things to the chatroom, but it hasn't been anything too bad. If you asked me, it sometimes makes the room a bit more interesting.
I Shot JFK
Feb 12 2007, 09:12 PM
well, yes, i get that, but who IS he in realtion to cb? a member?
There is no sudden need for the chat to be modded, as far as I can make out, it has just randomly happened.
ArjunaCapulong
Feb 12 2007, 09:12 PM
Ha, I know what you mean.
It's just completely random. I don't think he's even an active member.
I Shot JFK
Feb 12 2007, 09:15 PM
So essentially, some random person has come along and inserted himself as mod of CBC. Ok then.
How odd.
Well, ultimately, CBC isn't technically part of cB... it's just the AIM chatroom where members tend to hang out... So there really isn't any need for this to be discussed here, because there isn't anything anyone can do about it.
Ultimately, if, as Jesus suggested, it isn't a particualrly bad thing, then just keep on with it. If i gets irksome, make a new CBC. not much more anyone can say
ArjunaCapulong
Feb 12 2007, 09:17 PM
And that's exactly what happens anyway. Whenever there's a spam attack, we just move.
Not particularly convenient, but it's nothing difficult either.
mipadi
Feb 14 2007, 07:06 PM
I've missed something. Since when do AIM chats have moderators/owners? I thought they were pretty much just a free-for-all (pretty much why I always stayed out of them, to be honest).
disco infiltrator
Feb 14 2007, 07:23 PM
AIM Chats don't have moderators, but when an AOL user enters the chatroom and no one else is in it, they have "control" - it's a feature of AOL, but not AIM.
Jeng
Feb 14 2007, 08:13 PM
Yes but theree's plenty of programs out there that uses AOL and AIM, And this program which is in the chat allows people to kick and ban,,so its for AIM
Monochrome.
Feb 16 2007, 11:31 PM
^yeah. i mean yeah its anoying when people type like that. but is that really a reason to bann people from chat?
[all my good sns are banned now.]
mona lisa
Feb 16 2007, 11:46 PM
What the heck... I know cB and CBC were deemed separate entitites but this honestly cannot happen anymore. Being banned without any reason? Or for a silly reason? It's ridiculous.
Monochrome.
Feb 17 2007, 12:00 AM
lets go shank josh [elated ipod]
Im kidding.
honestly we need to either close the chat for a while or... just make a new one thats not on aim. like chatzy or something.
HakunaMatata
Feb 17 2007, 12:04 AM
...what's...chatzy?
Well, one of the best parts of AIM is it's accessability, there are tons and tons of people that have it.
And closing the chat for a while could lessen it's activity, and I'm pretty sure that that part of it is pretty valued.
However, are there any other solutions to just closing it for a while or closing it forever and opening a new one? Couldn't someone just "control" the other CBC, too?
Monochrome.
Feb 17 2007, 12:08 AM
oh.
chatzy is a place you can open up free private chat rooms
doughnut
Feb 17 2007, 12:10 AM
QUOTE(brownsugar @ Feb 17 2007, 12:09 PM)

OK if you say too many "I's" in the chat you get kicked.
Like hiiiiiiiiii
or Be riiiiiiiiight back
Like half of us got kicked today
You wanted me to try as well
moninja
Feb 17 2007, 12:17 AM
let's all just go to createblogchat2?
Monochrome.
Feb 17 2007, 12:18 AM
^it was fun though.
im still puzzled as to how a person can be booted for too many iii's
issey miyake
Feb 17 2007, 12:45 AM
certain words are prohibited i guess. the might consider it to be scrolling so yea
btw you guys are unbanned !
doughnut
Feb 17 2007, 01:02 AM
candycorn pop (下午 01:59:48): iiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
OnlineHost (下午 01:59:48): Your participation in the chat room "createblogchat" has been suspended by the member who created it. Please close this page.
What the f**k.
Uronacid
Feb 17 2007, 02:13 AM
He put my name on the anti-ban list XD
Jeng
Feb 18 2007, 05:47 PM
UHM NO ONES BANNED. I told you peoples to IM me. or something, I fixed Suz's, so ujst tell me, and closing the cbc is bad :[.
And the 'iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii' were autoworded because that's what bots would say when they come in to lag people.
Jeng
Feb 18 2007, 06:56 PM
Yea she monitors night cbc, and I monitor daytime cbc. So go contact Sandy or me if you need to be unbanned.
tininja
Feb 18 2007, 07:00 PM
But Mel, you're hardly in there.

Shouldn't there be another person to do it in the daytime? ._.
moninja
Feb 18 2007, 07:29 PM
QUOTE(tic tac. @ Feb 18 2007, 4:00 PM)

But Mel, you're hardly in there.

Shouldn't there be another person to do it in the daytime? ._.
word. that's what i was thinking. maybe op'ing a few more people?
Jeng
Feb 19 2007, 12:10 PM
YAH but I op'd Sandy so she's there at night and I'm there in the day.
clarity
Feb 19 2007, 02:15 PM
Okay, I'd like to get this loud and clear.
We don't need this.
Seriously, Especialy if the person who is going to "own" this chatroom is childish and unrespectable.
I went in there and got banned.
I was banned for questioning his, elated ipod, moderation. I told him that I don't think the reason why I was banned was fair. He said he banned me beacuse he can, Then he asked how it wasn't fair and then I explained how it wasn't fair. Then he said "your annoying me... my chatroom" something like that.
then he warned me.
If this chatroom is going to be "owned", at least have it owned by someone who isn't childish.
He's fifthteen, and I'm thirteen. Even I can act proper, and not childish about the situation.
I think we should make a new official chat room, and change the link above to it. And have someone who is not going to be childish about people questioning why or what. At this point we do need someone because he, elated ipod, could just take over again.
DivineFox
Feb 19 2007, 02:27 PM
I also don't like it, trying to have a decent chat when we were told by Melissa to leave so he can take over. The room is flooded by bots...what a coincidence and moments later they crashed my aim when I refused to leave...really mature there guys. I think that those of us who wanna not worry about this anymore should get a new chat program or something since stopping this 15 yr old kid seems pointless. Josh can have that chat room if that makes him happy, we'll just go somewhere else.
tininja
Feb 19 2007, 02:32 PM
No Mel. You missed Moni's and my point. We meant that there should be more daytime ops.
And yes, we probably should move elsewhere. If Josh (elated ipod) wants to be immature, then let him.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.