So I heard Angels & Demons (by Dan Brown) is going to be made into a movie as well, following The Da Vinci Code. Anyone else hear anything more about this? I already can't wait.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0808151/
Full Version: Angels & Demons
Interesting. They better not eff this up like they did with The Da Vinci Code.
I think they are gonna eff this one up. Look at the cast. They're thinking of casting Tom Hanks? O_O
Tom Cruise? 
Do you mean Tom Hanks?
Do you mean Tom Hanks?
^yeah for some reason my mind wrote cruise. O_O i think its cuz i just finished watching the movie Interew with the Vampire. lol. Well I edited it.
NO! Ditch Tom. Bring in Hugh Jackman! Come onnnnn! I wanna see him in another movie.
Anyways. Pray they don't screw it up.
Anyways. Pray they don't screw it up.
QUOTE(Summer Rain @ Jan 29 2007, 5:22 PM) 
I think they are gonna eff this one up. Look at the cast. They're thinking of casting Tom Hanks? O_O
Well, he did play Langdon in TDVC and A&D is about Langdon so it makes sense to bring him back.
^so? No it wouldn't TDVC was a terrible film and and Tom Hanks was a terrible pick (though a great actor). Great actors can be great but not at all movies. And I don't think Tom Hanks would be good for this movie..mostly because I don't like him. lol
QUOTE(Summer Rain @ Jan 29 2007, 5:42 PM)
^so? No it wouldn't TDVC was a terrible film and and Tom Hanks was a terrible pick (though a great actor). Great actors can be great but not at all movies. And I don't think Tom Hanks would be good for this movie..mostly because I don't like him. lol
Continuity.
^ Yeah, but look at Interview With the Vampire and Queen of the Damned. They used two different LeStats. Although the latter bombed at the box office, I think that Stuart Townsend fit the role better than Tom Cruise.
QUOTE(Summer Rain @ Jan 29 2007, 2:22 PM)
I think they are gonna eff this one up. Look at the cast. They're thinking of casting Tom Hanks? O_O
Tom Hanks already played Langdon in Da Vinci Code, so obviously they're using him again.
QUOTE(Kathleen @ Jan 29 2007, 8:10 PM)
^ Yeah, but look at Interview With the Vampire and Queen of the Damned. They used two different LeStats. Although the latter bombed at the box office, I think that Stuart Townsend fit the role better than Tom Cruise.
Well, IWtV was in 1994 and QotD was in 2002 so that's quite a few years apart whereas TDVC was only last year.
I thought angels and demons was WAY better than the book The Da Vinci Code
so..they better not screw this up
so..they better not screw this up
i am not surprised to hear this but hopefully they can learn from the mistakes from the da vinci code lol
That's weird... my dad JUST said to me the other day that A&D should hav ebeen made into a moive rather thhan TDVC...
He was right... the plot of A&D is SO much more Hollyowood
He was right... the plot of A&D is SO much more Hollyowood
OH MY GODDD that was the best book ever, I loved it. I'm trying not to expect much from the movie, though. Books are always so much better. The Da Vinci Code movie sucked, IMO. I'm hoping Angels & Demons won't.
QUOTE(I Shot JFK @ Jan 31 2007, 1:51 PM)
That's weird... my dad JUST said to me the other day that A&D should hav ebeen made into a moive rather thhan TDVC...
He was right... the plot of A&D is SO much more Hollyowood
That's what i said also! And then a couple days later i watched the DVD for TDVC and i saw the little note that said "in production, angels & demons."
He was right... the plot of A&D is SO much more Hollyowood
QUOTE(lovefooled @ Jan 29 2007, 3:45 PM)
Interesting. They better not eff this up like they did with The Da Vinci Code.
Most major motion picture books-to-movies get effed up...
It's a shame, I liked Angels and Demons MUCH more than The Da Vinci Code.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.