mszAPRiiL
Jun 21 2006, 07:57 PM
http://www.createblog.com/layouts/download.php?id=11964she stole MY graphic i created!!!!!! want proof?
http://img151.imageshack.us/img151/6083/jojo1tk.png <- my graphic
that pisses me off! the work I put into my graphics & ppl have to go and jock my graphics!!!! what the hell is up with that?
demolished
Jun 21 2006, 08:02 PM
read the author's comments
QUOTE
Designer's comments
Jojo, pretteh.. Like the skin?
I used another user's image, once again. Once I find the author, I will give credit.
anyways, it should be removed.
mszAPRiiL
Jun 21 2006, 08:07 PM
QUOTE(Spiritual Winged Aura @ Jun 21 2006, 9:02 PM)

read the author's comments
anyways, it should be removed.
yeah, she needs to remove it because thats copyright violation
sadolakced acid
Jun 21 2006, 08:08 PM
you didn't take that picture yourself, did you?
so you are, in effect, stealing the photographer's artwork.
i don't think it's called jocking if she's trying to credit you. i mean, sure, asking for permission first would have been good, but still.
mona lisa
Jun 21 2006, 08:09 PM
I removed it. It's easier to PM something like to an Admin or Head Staff because they have to power to do so. Thanks for reporting it though. It's wrong to use another's graphic whether or not you credit; you must be granted permission to use it.
Justin- Then most of the layouts on the internet, not just cB, would be considered jocked. I know where you're coming from, but it's impractical.
Edit\
Okay, now I'm just being hypocritical.
tcunningham1589
Jun 21 2006, 08:11 PM
Would it be all right to just have her credit the picture? It would be wrong to delete the layout because of the image that she used. And she did say that she would give the proper credit to the creator of the image, when she found out who it was. I go through this all the time, I find some of my old layouts on other sites, when I ask them where they got the image, they just said that they googled for it. And they always oblidge when I ask if they could give me credit for the image.
edit// i guess mona just took a quicker approach.
mszAPRiiL
Jun 21 2006, 08:15 PM
thing is, she should of known who the creator was since she got it from this site. so she should of came to me and asked and then credited me. how else would she of found it? plus she edited it as well
sadolakced acid
Jun 21 2006, 08:21 PM
maybe she googled jojo and it came up.
the link isn't from the site, so if she just did a picture search she wouldn't have known.
usually, you do like to see them change it a bit more to justify artistic use, but really, there's no standard.
tcunningham1589
Jun 21 2006, 08:27 PM
QUOTE(mszAPRiiL @ Jun 21 2006, 9:15 PM)

thing is, she should of known who the creator was since she got it from this site. so she should of came to me and asked and then credited me. how else would she of found it? plus she edited it as well
no necissarily. If she googled it, someone else could have jocked it from here, from you. And then she could have gotten it off that persons site, and they could have said like (All images are okay to use wherever you want) so she probably didn't know. She just knew that the image had to have been from someone. plus she could have also gotten it off the site, the same way that she has it. Becuase she didnt mention anywhere that she edited it. at all.
mszAPRiiL
Jun 21 2006, 08:29 PM
QUOTE(defrag @ Jun 21 2006, 9:27 PM)

no necissarily. If she googled it, someone else could have jocked it from here, from you. And then she could have gotten it off that persons site, and they could have said like (All images are okay to use wherever you want) so she probably didn't know. She just knew that the image had to have been from someone. plus she could have also gotten it off the site, the same way that she has it. Becuase she didnt mention anywhere that she edited it. at all.
didnt us ee the image i done? she deleted my stuff i put... or someone did
tcunningham1589
Jun 21 2006, 08:30 PM
QUOTE(mszAPRiiL @ Jun 21 2006, 9:29 PM)

didnt us ee the image i done? she deleted my stuff i put... or someone did
i did. that is why I said the persons site where she could have gotten the image from.
Gypsy Eyes
Jun 21 2006, 08:34 PM
QUOTE(mszAPRiiL @ Jun 21 2006, 9:07 PM)

yeah, she needs to remove it because thats copyright violation
do you have a copyright on that? Not just writing on it but an actual copyright?
sadolakced acid
Jun 21 2006, 08:41 PM
i believe as of 2001 everything is automatically copyrighted, whether or not the owner puts a little © on it or not.
Gypsy Eyes
Jun 21 2006, 08:44 PM
If they just make it, it isn't copyrighted. Posting it on DA makes it copyrighted and so does getting something that I believe is called a creative common liscence (sorry I'm not sure if that is what it's called). I'm not saying it's right, just that unless she has that it isn't copyrighted.
It's a pet peeve I have, when people put the © when it isn't
here :
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/
maryissa
Jun 21 2006, 10:21 PM
WOW, this is the 2nd time i heard that xiicedfrosting jocked someone's work.
Libertie
Jun 21 2006, 11:48 PM
Will message her. The layout has been removed and the issue resolved, so I will close this now.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.