GREASEbaby
Apr 15 2006, 09:45 PM
I was browsing through the layouts..and I found a couple "eek"ish layouts. For example:
http://www.createblog.com/layouts/preview.php?id=10308^All it is is a left and right column.
http://www.createblog.com/layouts/preview.php?id=10018^I don't know about you, but that text seems a little hard to read - isn't that one of the standards?
http://www.createblog.com/layouts/preview.php?id=9966^I don't know about you, but I don't know anybody who would like to have that big long profile.
http://www.createblog.com/layouts/preview.php?id=9870^The white text makes it almost impossible to read.
http://www.createblog.com/layouts/preview.php?id=9782^HUGE horizontal scrollbar.
Don't get me wrong, I love creatblog, but some of these layouts are AH...
I really really really hope none of the designers took this offensively, but took it as constructive critisism.
Jane Doe.
Apr 15 2006, 09:57 PM
Eh. I rejected the first one, as I thought it was too simple...
The 3rd:
I think is fine, really, since it has a nice theme, is organized well and such. I see no problem with it, really.
The 5th:
It's supposed to be like that. The main image is very well designed, but is just wide.
Gigi
Apr 15 2006, 10:01 PM
The last one is supposed to be like that. =\
sprezzatura
Apr 17 2006, 09:11 PM
I think any of the design staffs can fix the text part for some of the scripts.
As ^x2 said, the first one has been rejected.
Also the wide layout is fine, but it is just quite inconvenient.
The third one is okay too.
My Cinderella.
Apr 17 2006, 09:17 PM
I think the 2nd and the 3rd one are fine.
Ambuletz
Apr 17 2006, 10:40 PM
QUOTE(I own yourr face. @ Apr 15 2006, 9:45 PM)

You've never seen layouts like that? Instead of having a thin page going up and down, it's just going horizontally. It's a very unique style.
Libertie
Apr 17 2006, 10:43 PM
I'm sorry, but I just edited the text on the second one. I had already done that and I PMed the author to let her know that she could either leave the colors I used or pick her own that can actually be read, and I'm assuming she just edited it back. But that's why I didn't reject it, I thought it was pretty but you just couldn't read the text. So I fixed it and assumedly she didn't like it. If she insists on leaving the text like that, I'll be rejecting it. =\ But I just quickly fixed it back, tell me if that looks better?
Agreed, the first one is gone.. But about the 3rd and 5th ones, I don't see anything wrong. However, the 4th one.. Yeah, the text is definitely hard to read. I will PM the author to edit it.
n00b
Apr 17 2006, 11:56 PM
The first one= Agree. Eh WAY to simple. It needs color and more divs
The second one= Agree. I can't read that.
The third one= Agree. stretches the page alot.
The fourth one= doesn't even work in IE
The fifth one= I disagree. This one is unique and cozy.
This was a nice post.
misoshiru
Apr 18 2006, 05:00 AM
I was wondering why this was brought up in feedback, and not just PM'ed to one of the Design mods or such.
GREASEbaby
Apr 18 2006, 11:48 AM
Okay, I guess the layouts
are okay. And I'm glad the first one has been taken off

I guess this topic can be closed now.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.