I think I've explained that several times. I dont think he was aware that your site was competing so if someone simply requested for him to put it back on he would have after he accepted it. After the second time I was convinced that he didn't know and tried to contact him. And dont worry Ed will make sure that whole issue is addressed as well.

Or maybe he just considered it not technicslly competing???

He's not completely clueless. We should try to be consistant in our credit-giving.

I dont know that's what I trying to contact him to find out.

thanks for pointing that out

i wasnt here for any of this, but i can assure you (even though i'm not a mod) that it is not on the back burner seeing as jusun was here about 5 mins ago.

im not going to take sides and this is all im going to say.

anyone who wants to discuss this issue now, come to the aim chat : "cbcompete"

no1 is in the chat room

All of the dicussion has ended in there.

o

.... lol
im a loser... dang

its..over.

and it was rewarding too.

thanks so much jusun.

wow

i didnt even realize that the chat was posted 40 minutes ago...

my bad

No, its not over. One forum admin got his/her way, while others have to sit back and still live with the outrageous rules. It is not over, they reached a under the rug compromise, that singles out other forums, but allows others. Half assed way of fixing something.

i didnt get my way! the decisions jusun made are pretty fair for everyone.

how do you feel that it singles out certain forums? the rules have been stated something along the lines of:

any sites will be allowed for topsite.

sig/avatar cannot contain any reference (or links) to websites other than personal blog sites (ie xanga, myspace, blogger, etc...)

so pretty much both of these rules are not singling out anyone but accepts all (for topsite) and rejects all (for avatars and sigs).

An understanding has been reached, everyone agreed, why did you opt to not give your view in the chatroom when you were in there? That's bad timing, and you are going to beat a dead horse if you continue.

But we all said we were okay with the outcome. I think if we weren't okay with the "outrageous rules" someone would've said something in there. And from what I gathered, linking to ANY forums in a signature is not allowed, so it doesn't allow some while singling others out.. Sorry, I guess I'm just not understanding you or we're not on the same page here.

hi all,
updated the community guidelines to reflect the new rules:

http://www.createblog.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=970