QUOTE(digital.fragrance @ Dec 20 2005, 9:09 PM)
Okay, I apoligize for using a strong word - I didn't intend it to mean hatred. My fault.
Separation of church and state was intended to protect our future by making a national church impossible (like that of the Anglican Church of England). The founding fathers were protecting America from becoming a government like England in the 1790's. That's why so many people came here in the first place - for religious freedom. Public schools, at least where I'm from, can't talk about God. They can get in serious trouble if they do, and then they teach evolution like it's the only way (this is where Intelligent Design comes in, but not in this topic). Can you at least see where we are coming from? After 2 + centuries of complete freedom, the nation is shoving us out (figuratively, of course).
Yes yes, no need for a history lesson. I've said the same things in the debate forum too many times already. And though I understand you may not have mean "hate" in that context, you can't say the same for other Christians. I know for certain that there are Christians who truly hate it, or else why would they go through the trouble of protesting?
No, I don't see where Christians get the idea that it's okay to be angry at folks who say Happy Holidays when they have the same freedom to say Merry Christmas whenever they want to. I would like to know which US shools forbid students to pray to God or to talk about God without evangelizing. I would agree with you that your freedom is threaten if that is the case, however, I've never heard of any school that forbid just talking about God. Maybe you could tell me since I haven't read about it. After two centuries of religious freedom, Americans can finally SHARE the Winter Holidays and not just celebrate for the sole reason of Christ's supposed birthday.
QUOTE
Is it bad to celebrate something on the same day? It's impossible to set a date on when Christ was born (with the calender's and translations being so different) - yet Christ was born, and we might as well celebrate sometime.
I've already mentioned this, though it's not possible to agree on a specific date, it is a fact accepted by all credible religious institution that Christ was not born on December 25th and that the reason December 25th was chosen was for the conversion of Pagans. Again, this cannot be refuted. Yes, it should be celebrated sometimes, but when the Church thought it'd be convenient to celebrate it on Decemeber 25th, they should have taken into consideration that not everyone will want to hold celebration in the name of Christ since not everyone is Christian. It's kind of like first come first serve. However, the first comer in this case was "shoved out" of the way by force ("figuratively, of course").
QUOTE
Did I say somone was discriminating by saying Happy Holidays? I have nothing against "Happy Holidays" itself. No - Walmart forbid their employees to say Merry Christmas, while they allowed them to say Happy Hannukah, Happy Kwanza, and Happy Holidays. Excluding "Merry Christmas" and nothing else is discrimination.
You didn't, but the SOURCE you provided did. Don't tell me you didn't read the source you gave. Here, I'll quote it again.
QUOTE([url=http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=47634)
]After a series of reports by WND, however, Wal-Mart officials satisfied demands by the Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights, which had called for a national boycott after accusing the retail giant of discriminating against Christmas while promoting other seasonal holidays by name, such as Kwanzaa and Hanukkah.
QUOTE
About the woman and her choice - she should be protected from a situation like that... taking away her freedom is taking advantage of a person in that situation.
If you think the woman should be protected from that, the people at Walmart should be protected from angry "Merry Christmas" loving Christians, too. I mean, if she deserves more choices, then shouldn't Walmart, too?
QUOTE
The man wasn't forcing the operator from Target - he just found out what he wanted, that Target wasn't allowing their employees to say "Merry Christmas."
No, you said the lady said "it's not my job". It's another way of saying, I don't want to have to wish you a Merry Christmas. Have you, for a moment after hearing that guy on the radio, thought that maybe the lady isn't Christian and is adverse to saying Merry Christmas? No. Everyone assumes that she isn't allowed to say Merry Christmas. Even if that is the case, had she been a real Christian, she wouldn't have mind wishing the man a Merry Christmas. If she is terminated for that, she could sue and I'm sure the nice, Christmas-loving radio man would have paid for her lawyer expenses. This reminds of a story when I was a hostess at Pappadeaux Seafood Kitchen. A customer spilled his drink on the table and screamed at me to clean it up and I told him, you guessed it, "it's not my job, sir, but I'll get someone in a second". Hmm, I could never stand those uptight snobs.
QUOTE
I have nothing against saying "Happy Holidays." It's just fact that they are doing it instead of Christmas (like they used to) is bothering me. They can say Happy Hannukah, or Happy Kwanza..... just not Merry Christmas.
So they used to say Merry Christmas ALL THE TIME, maybe it's time for a new way to celebrate. A way that's inclusive, not exclusive.
QUOTE
Not allowing employees to say "Merry Christmas" is taking away some freedom, no matter how much the term "Happy Holidays" encompasses. It's still something they can't say because it's not "politically correct."
That's true, but I've yet to read anything that says Walmart or any company that forbids its employees to say Merry Christmas. I've heard that Walmart encourages its employees to say Happy Holidays, but I've yet to hear anything about it completely forbiding employees from Merry Christmas. Where are you guys getting these news?