heyyfrankie
Nov 13 2005, 11:32 AM
uh..i think so. why wouldn't it..?
Heathasm
Nov 13 2005, 11:34 AM
aye
heyyfrankie
Nov 13 2005, 11:41 AM
oooooooooooo. :x
sadolakced acid
Nov 13 2005, 12:53 PM
wait wait wait...
shouldn't there be a limit less than 10 for design staff?
like. 5?
becuase, you kinda want everyone who's nominated to be a good choice for mod.
and i think that whatever thread is used for nominations should show who's been nominated.
disco infiltrator
Nov 13 2005, 12:59 PM
Well the mods are nominating, and if there isn't 10 people that are even said, only the amount of people that are nominated will be in the poll. There is no minimum, but 10 is the max.
Aye. (Obviously)
incoherent
Nov 13 2005, 03:04 PM
so whoever the mods feel should be nominated, nominate that person backstage and then that person is confronted?
if thats what you mean, then nay.
mzkandi
Nov 13 2005, 03:08 PM
Ok, so
1. Mods nominate people
2. Each staff section is then presented to community so they can give feedback
3. This feedback (combined with staff feedback) is then taken to consideration by the hiring staff
4. Then mods are hired
Did I get that right?
incoherent
Nov 13 2005, 03:22 PM
QUOTE(mzkandi @ Nov 13 2005, 2:08 PM)
Ok, so
1. Mods nominate people
2. Each staff section is then presented to community so they can give feedback
3. This feedback (combined with staff feedback) is then taken to consideration by the hiring staff
4. Then mods are hired
Did I get that right?
alright, so the mods nominate and then 10 people are picked from each group...?
disco infiltrator
Nov 13 2005, 03:32 PM
1) Mods nominate people they want for any category, no matter their category.
2) There is no minimum of nominations we must have, but the maximum for each separate category is 10.
3) Once all the nominations are said and done, polls are made for each category with the nominations.
4) The community votes on those previously made nominations on who they think is best.
5) Heads and Admins use both the community and mod input to make their final decision.
6) New mods are hired.
'Tis the process.
incoherent
Nov 13 2005, 03:43 PM
that makes it confusing. how does a mod know what category a person wants though if the person just doesnt come out and say it?
disco infiltrator
Nov 13 2005, 03:47 PM
Do you know what a nomination is?
nomination - The act or an instance of submitting a name for candidacy or appointment.
It's a nomination, not a direct hiring. The people can turn it down.
Besides, it's pretty easy to see who's better in the Design forums than the Community..
mzkandi
Nov 13 2005, 03:50 PM
Or that nominee could request to be considered for another postion as well....
In either case......I'm not feeling this 100% currently.
incoherent
Nov 13 2005, 03:51 PM
i know what a nomination is.
what i was stating was how is a mod going to know what position a person wants if theyre going to nominate them?
like say i wanted to be nominated for people staff, but i cant just p/m you and say "will you nominate me for people staff and not design staff?" before the nominations are made public. you'd have to p/m the person if you think they are worthy of being modded.
sadolakced acid
Nov 13 2005, 05:05 PM
it requries knowing the person.
sense.n.style
Nov 13 2005, 05:19 PM
i like #1 cuz it actually requires something besides their popularity... yeah.

i like no. 1
disco infiltrator
Nov 13 2005, 07:48 PM
QUOTE(incoherent @ Nov 13 2005, 3:51 PM)
i know what a nomination is.
what i was stating was how is a mod going to know what position a person wants if theyre going to nominate them?
like say i wanted to be nominated for people staff, but i cant just p/m you and say "will you nominate me for people staff and not design staff?" before the nominations are made public. you'd have to p/m the person if you think they are worthy of being modded.
Well yea, we went over that already..the people included in the polls would be asked...
incoherent
Nov 13 2005, 07:48 PM
alright...i guess i missed that.
Rachel
Nov 13 2005, 08:09 PM
^As did I =]
KissMe2408
Nov 13 2005, 08:43 PM
hmm...
i'm not really easy with the nomination thing...I really like the idea of having whoever wants to apply can apply. I mean we designed all the other by-laws based around that idea, not really based on nominations.
If we're voting I would have to say "Nay"...
I'm not really too easy about it, and I still think that the way it is now works really well.
racoons > you
Nov 14 2005, 02:36 PM
frankie, as much as you are a wonderful personim afrqaid you arent on the committee
= (
oh. SO didnt notice there was another whole page, sorry frankie, to tell you again
oh, and 4 ayes, but no actual nays.
kiera, i assume that as you weren't feeling it, you're a nay, but i didnt count you so as to be sure you had actually cast a vote one way or another
incoherent
Nov 14 2005, 02:54 PM
QUOTE(incoherent @ Nov 13 2005, 2:04 PM)
so whoever the mods feel should be nominated, nominate that person backstage and then that person is confronted?
if thats what you mean, then nay.
james, mine is a nay...
mzkandi
Nov 14 2005, 03:52 PM
James - Spencer and Katie both said nay and I am still deciding.
racoons > you
Nov 14 2005, 04:34 PM
oh, i missed katie's vote, thanks...
i assumed that since spencer had voted without understanding what it meant, and then had it explained, that hi soriginal vote would be rethought, so i'll leave that until he confirms one way or th other
so, 4 definate ayes, 1 definate nay
incoherent
Nov 14 2005, 04:36 PM
nay...
i dont like having the mods nominate people...i think it should be more a community thing. alright, im not going to go into what i think. i vote NAY
racoons > you
Nov 14 2005, 05:10 PM
ok then, with that confirmed,
4 ayes, 2 nays
mzkandi
Nov 16 2005, 07:19 PM
I'm in favor of a somewhat more traditonal way. As far all qualifed members applying (via submission of application). Then have a community thread so the community can have a say in who they should be a mod and well as one backstage for mods to voice their opinion. The feedback from both sides would be taken in consideration for by the admins and head staff on who they think should be hired. It opens it up for more variety of people to apply so no one is overlooked, at least, thats what I think.
So nay on mod nominations.
Teesa
Nov 16 2005, 08:21 PM
QUOTE(mzkandi @ Nov 16 2005, 7:19 PM)
I'm in favor of a somewhat more traditonal way. As far all qualifed members applying (via submission of application). Then have a community thread so the community can have a say in who they should be a mod and well as one backstage for mods to voice their opinion. The feedback from both sides would be taken in consideration for by the admins and head staff on who they think should be hired. It opens it up for more variety of people to apply so no one is overlooked, at least, thats what I think.
So nay on mod nominations.
Agreed. I really like the traditional method. And like what Kiera already mentioned, I think it's the best way for everyone to participate.
Ington
Nov 16 2005, 08:27 PM
Aye, but in your post, James, you forgot to say that the members vote on the nominations afterwards.
mzkandi
Nov 16 2005, 08:47 PM
^ Sorry, you have to a committee member in order to vote on anything.
racoons > you
Nov 17 2005, 04:36 PM
ariel, its been said... and i cant edit my posts.
anyway
4 ayes, 3 nays
yet to vote:
nicki
stephen
michael
tweeak
Nov 17 2005, 05:48 PM
aye
mipadi
Nov 17 2005, 05:52 PM
Aye
racoons > you
Nov 17 2005, 06:44 PM
in that case, the motion has passed, with 6 ayes to 3 nays
someone add this, por favor...
im going to close this, as i feel it has been resolved, obviously, anyone who disagrees, re-open
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.