QUOTE(evanbunnell @ Oct 23 2005, 10:03 AM)
This is flaming. I assumed that forum was not tolerant of such posts.
And again. This isn't about being an official member to get rid of flood control. It's about not having it period. For anyone.
Again, I will say that the other thread was originally on the issue of flood control for
all members; the solution reached was to remove it for official members.
And that was not flaming; she was not attacking
you, she was stating that your thread is crap. Which it is, because it's already been made before.
QUOTE(evanbunnell @ Oct 23 2005, 10:00 AM)
If they aren't dedicated, what's the problem with ridding flood control? It's rather silly to have a flood control on a group of people who do not post, not effecting them in the least. But for those of us in said group that do post frequently, it's an annoyance more than a hinderance. Also, because I read at a decent speed and can type at more than 40 wpm does not mean I am spamming or posting irrelevant posts.
I simply do not see why flood control is needed, in theory or in action.
Hon. If they're not dedicated, they don't
deserve it. It's even sillier to have
no flood control for a member group in which there thousands of people who have the potential to spam up the entire forum. Just because you, as an individual regular member, find it annoying, admin isn't going to remove flood control.
If you hate it that much, just become an official member. Geez.
And stop double posting.